IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i20p11161-d652687.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of Spirituality in the Career and STEM-Based Research Approach of Scientists for Sustainable Development: A Study on the Perspective of Scientists from a Public Research University in Malaysia

Author

Listed:
  • Mohd Razip Bajuri

    (Faculty of Education, Department of Mathematics and Science Education, University Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia)

  • Suzieleez Syrene Abdul Rahim

    (Faculty of Education, Department of Mathematics and Science Education, University Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia)

  • Edy Hafizan Mohd Shahali

    (Faculty of Education, Department of Mathematics and Science Education, University Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia)

  • Siti Mistima Maat

    (Faculty of Education, Research Center of Teaching and Learning Innovation, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Malaysia)

Abstract

This explanatory case study aims to formulate a framework of spiritual influence on Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM)-based research for sustainable development from the perspective of university scientists. This single-site case qualitative study involves seven participants from a Malaysian public research university with a variety of specific research fields. Questions regarding the driving factors of their research strategy for sustainable technology developments were asked. Consequently, the main driving factors on using STEM approaches for sustainable developments are career competency enhancements. This theme can be proven with elements, such as STEM for enhancing the ability to expand a specific field contribution, improving interdisciplinary management, obtaining outsource support, and enhancing innovative capability. Meanwhile, spiritual influence on sustainable development is a part of the philosophy of participants and can be proven through the elements of moral and ethical beliefs with respect to religious values in their scientific career and STEM-based research practice. Therefore, the influence of spirituality is a crucial concept, which can ensure social, emotional, economic, and environmental sustainability development. This framework is built among limited participants. Thus, confirming this framework by using a wide range of samples is encouraged. Moreover, this study generally has implications for sustainable development using STEM-based practice for specific field expertise. The concept aims to provide remarkable contributions to the growth of comprehensive, holistic, and sustainable development and to extend the current literature on STEM research approaches by inculcating spiritual elements.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohd Razip Bajuri & Suzieleez Syrene Abdul Rahim & Edy Hafizan Mohd Shahali & Siti Mistima Maat, 2021. "Influence of Spirituality in the Career and STEM-Based Research Approach of Scientists for Sustainable Development: A Study on the Perspective of Scientists from a Public Research University in Malays," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-24, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:20:p:11161-:d:652687
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/20/11161/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/20/11161/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alireza Tajbakhsh & Elkafi Hassini, 2015. "Performance measurement of sustainable supply chains: a review and research questions," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 64(6), pages 744-783, July.
    2. Veugelers, Reinhilde & Wang, Jian, 2019. "Scientific novelty and technological impact," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(6), pages 1362-1372.
    3. Martín-Martín, Alberto & Orduna-Malea, Enrique & Thelwall, Mike & Delgado López-Cózar, Emilio, 2018. "Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 1160-1177.
    4. Amal Altaf & Mohammad Awan, 2011. "Moderating Affect of Workplace Spirituality on the Relationship of Job Overload and Job Satisfaction," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 104(1), pages 93-99, November.
    5. Alamo Alexandre da Silva Batista & Antonio Carlos de Francisco, 2018. "Organizational Sustainability Practices: A Study of the Firms Listed by the Corporate Sustainability Index," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chunlian Chen & Babar Nawaz Abbasi & Ali Sohail, 2022. "Scientific Research of Innovation Ability of Universities in the United States of America and China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-22, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Malesios, Chrisovalantis & De, Debashree & Moursellas, Andreas & Dey, Prasanta & Evangelinos, Konstantinos, 2019. "Review of Statistical Modeling Approaches for Sustainability Analysis of Small and Medium sized Enterprises," MPRA Paper 93028, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Malesios, Chrisovalantis & De, Debashree & Moursellas, Andreas & Dey, Prasanta Kumar & Evangelinos, Konstantinos, 2021. "Sustainability performance analysis of small and medium sized enterprises: Criteria, methods and framework," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    3. David Jancsics & Salvador Espinosa & Jonathan Carlos, 2023. "Organizational noncompliance: an interdisciplinary review of social and organizational factors," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 73(3), pages 1273-1301, September.
    4. Jingqi Gao & Xiang Wu & Xiaowei Luo & Shukai Guan, 2021. "Scientometric Analysis of Safety Sign Research: 1990–2019," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-15, January.
    5. Cristina Robledo-Ardila & Juan Pablo Román-Calderón, 2022. "Potential: in search for meaning, theory and avenues for future research a systematic review," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 72(1), pages 149-186, February.
    6. Vivek Kumar Singh & Prashasti Singh & Mousumi Karmakar & Jacqueline Leta & Philipp Mayr, 2021. "The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(6), pages 5113-5142, June.
    7. Mohamed Basta & James Lapalme & Marc Paquet, 2021. "A Systems Thinking Analysis of the Supply Chain Social Responsibility Literature," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(4), pages 537-554, August.
    8. Arjun Kumar Shrestha & Lalatendu Kesari Jena, 2021. "Interactive Effects of Workplace Spirituality and Psychological Capital on Employee Negativity," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 46(1), pages 59-77, February.
    9. Manuel Tejeda, 2015. "Exploring the Supportive Effects of Spiritual Well-Being on Job Satisfaction Given Adverse Work Conditions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 131(1), pages 173-181, September.
    10. Gonzalo Wandosell & María C. Parra-Meroño & Alfredo Alcayde & Raúl Baños, 2021. "Green Packaging from Consumer and Business Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-19, January.
    11. Pantea Kamrani & Isabelle Dorsch & Wolfgang G. Stock, 2021. "Do researchers know what the h-index is? And how do they estimate its importance?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(7), pages 5489-5508, July.
    12. Perez-Vega, Rodrigo & Hopkinson, Paul & Singhal, Aishwarya & Mariani, Marcello M., 2022. "From CRM to social CRM: A bibliometric review and research agenda for consumer research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 1-16.
    13. Zoltán Krajcsák, 2021. "Researcher Performance in Scopus Articles ( RPSA ) as a New Scientometric Model of Scientific Output: Tested in Business Area of V4 Countries," Publications, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-23, October.
    14. Tianlong Yu & Hao Yang & Xiaowei Luo & Yifeng Jiang & Xiang Wu & Jingqi Gao, 2021. "Scientometric Analysis of Disaster Risk Perception: 2000–2020," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-19, December.
    15. Makomborero Bure & Robertson K. Tengeh, 2019. "Implementation of internal controls and the sustainability of SMEs in Harare in Zimbabwe," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 7(1), pages 201-218, September.
    16. Rok Lee, 2021. "The Effect of Supply Chain Management Strategy on Operational and Financial Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-18, May.
    17. Nazanin Hosseini Arian & Alireza Pooya & Fariborz Rahimnia & Ali Sibevei, 2021. "Assessment the effect of rapid prototyping implementation on supply chain sustainability: a system dynamics approach," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 467-493, December.
    18. Zamani, Mehdi & Yalcin, Haydar & Naeini, Ali Bonyadi & Zeba, Gordana & Daim, Tugrul U, 2022. "Developing metrics for emerging technologies: identification and assessment," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    19. Ke, Qing, 2020. "Technological impact of biomedical research: The role of basicness and novelty," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(7).
    20. Sam Arts & Nicola Melluso & Reinhilde Veugelers, 2023. "Beyond Citations: Measuring Novel Scientific Ideas and their Impact in Publication Text," Papers 2309.16437, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2023.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:20:p:11161-:d:652687. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.