IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i18p10142-d633150.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Contribution of Natural Resource Producing Sectors to the Economic Development of the Sakha Republic

Author

Listed:
  • Shinichiro Tabata

    (Slavic-Eurasian Research Center, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0809, Japan)

Abstract

This paper provides basic materials for considering the sustainability of natural resource development in the Arctic, taking the Sakha Republic as a case study of the Russian Arctic regions. The author clarifies the contribution of the mining industry to the economic development of Sakha with special attention paid to the contribution to government budgets by numerical and statistical analysis of regional and municipal data. The paper demonstrates that the mining industry has been a driving force of the economic growth of Sakha and that the oil sector has sharply increased its presence while the diamond sector has decreased its presence. Simultaneously, it reveals that the mining industry is unevenly developed in Sakha, which has caused significant inequality in per capita Gross Municipal Product (GMP). Then, the analysis of the paper shows that Sakha’s contribution to the federal budget has increased significantly in recent years due to growing oil production and that the diamond sector is still more influential than the oil sector in the contribution to the republican and local budgets.

Suggested Citation

  • Shinichiro Tabata, 2021. "The Contribution of Natural Resource Producing Sectors to the Economic Development of the Sakha Republic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-17, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:18:p:10142-:d:633150
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/18/10142/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/18/10142/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Masaaki Kuboniwa & Yasushi Nakamura & Kazuhiro Kumo & Yoshisada Shida (ed.), 2019. "Russian Economic Development over Three Centuries," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-981-13-8429-5, September.
    2. Alexeev, Michael & Weber, Shlomo (ed.), 2013. "The Oxford Handbook of the Russian Economy," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199759927.
    3. Michael Alexeev & Shlomo Weber, 2013. "Russian economy, the," The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics,, Palgrave Macmillan.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Izabela Jonek-Kowalska & Marian Turek, 2022. "The Economic Situation of Polish Cities in Post-Mining Regions. Long-Term Analysis on the Example of the Upper Silesian Coal Basin," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-21, April.
    2. Stephanie Pfirman & Gail Fondahl & Grete K. Hovelsrud & Tero Mustonen, 2023. "Shaping Tomorrow’s Arctic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-5, February.
    3. Ivan Potravny & Andrey Novoselov & Irina Novoselova & Katherine Yeshia Chávez Ferreyra & Violetta Gassiy, 2022. "Route Selection for Minerals’ Transportation to Ensure Sustainability of the Arctic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-16, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Simone Auer & Emidio Cocozza & Andrea COlabella, 2016. "The financial systems in Russia and Turkey: recent developments and challenges," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 358, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    2. Sergey V. Smirnov & Nikolay V. Kondrashov & Anna V. Petronevich, 2017. "Dating Cyclical Turning Points for Russia: Formal Methods and Informal Choices," Journal of Business Cycle Research, Springer;Centre for International Research on Economic Tendency Surveys (CIRET), vol. 13(1), pages 53-73, May.
    3. repec:rnp:rpaper:repkz1 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Wojciech Charemza & Svetlana Makarova & Imran Shah, 2015. "Making the most of high inflation," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(34-35), pages 3723-3739, July.
    5. Marnix Van Soom & Milan Van Den Heuvel & Jan Ryckebusch & Koen Schoors, 2019. "Loan Maturity Aggregation In Interbank Lending Networks Obscures Mesoscale Structure And Economic Functions," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 19/952, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    6. Zvi Lerman, 2017. "Should agricultural employment in transition economies be encouraged?," IZA World of Labor, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), pages 328-328, January.
    7. Fursov, Konstantin & Thurner, Thomas & Nefedova, Alena, 2017. "What user-innovators do that others don't: A study of daily practices," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 153-160.
    8. Chernina, Eugenia & Gimpelson, Vladimir, 2022. "Do Wages Grow with Experience? Deciphering the Russian Puzzle," IZA Discussion Papers 15068, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    9. Brown, David J. & Earle, John S. & Telegdy, Almos, 2016. "Where does privatization work? Understanding the heterogeneity in estimated firm performance effects," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 329-362.
    10. Leonid Polishchuk & Georgiy Syunyaev, 2015. "Ruling elites’ rotation and asset ownership: implications for property rights," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 162(1), pages 159-182, January.
    11. Carsten Herrmann-Pillath, 2019. "Power, ideas and culture in the ‘longue durée’ of institutional evolution: theory and application on the revolutions of property rights in Russia," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 29(5), pages 1483-1506, November.
    12. Baranov, Alexey & Malkov, Egor & Polishchuk, Leonid & Rochlitz, Michael & Syunyaev, Georgiy, 2015. "How (not) to measure Russian regional institutions," Russian Journal of Economics, Elsevier, vol. 1(2), pages 154-181.
    13. Vladimir Gimpelson, 2019. "The labor market in Russia, 2000–2017," IZA World of Labor, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), pages 466-466, September.
    14. Gustafsson, Björn Anders & Nivorozhkina, Ludmila & Wan, Haiyuan, 2021. "Working Beyond the Normal Retirement Age in Urban China and Urban Russia," IZA Discussion Papers 14294, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    15. Gustafsson Björn & Nivorozhkina Ludmila & Wan Haiyuan, 2021. "Working beyond the normal retirement age in urban China and urban Russia," IZA Journal of Development and Migration, Sciendo & Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit GmbH (IZA), vol. 12(1), pages 1-21, January.
    16. Alexeev, Michael (Алексеев, Майкл) & Mamedov, Arseny (Мамедов, Арсений) & Fomina, Evgenia (Фомина, Евгения) & Deryugin, Alexander (Дерюгин, Александр), 2017. "Influence of the Main Characteristics of Interbudgetary Relations on the Indicators of Economic Development of the Subjects of the Russian Federation [Влияние Основных Характеристик Межбюджетных От," Working Papers 031717, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.
    17. Alexeev, Michael & Chernyavskiy, Andrey, 2018. "A tale of two crises: Federal transfers and regional economies in Russia in 2009 and 2014–2015," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 175-185.
    18. Michael Alexeev & Nikolay Avxentyev & Arseny Mamedov & Sergey G. Sinelnikov-Murylev, 2019. "Fiscal Decentralization, Budget Discipline, and Local Finance Reform in Russia’s Regions," Public Finance Review, , vol. 47(4), pages 679-717, July.
    19. Carsten Sprenger, 2014. "Privatization And Survival – Evidence From A Russian Firm Survey," Economic Annals, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Belgrade, vol. 59(200), pages 43-60, January –.
    20. Natkhov, T. & Polishchuk, L., 2017. "Political Economy of Institutions and Development: The Importance of Being Inclusive. Reflection on "Why Nations Fail" by D. Acemoglu and J. Robinson. Part II. Institutional Change and Impli," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 35(3), pages 12-32.
    21. Gregory Brock & Constantin Ogloblin, 2018. "Russian 1998–2007 TFP decomposed: some inspiration emerging from inherited Soviet legacy," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 135-151, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:18:p:10142-:d:633150. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.