IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i17p9632-d623180.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Construction Risk Evaluation of Poor Geological Channels Based on Cloud Model-Improved AHP–Matter–Element Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Qingfu Li

    (School of Water Conservancy Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China)

  • Zhipeng Wang

    (School of Water Conservancy Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China)

  • Linfang Lu

    (Construction Administration of the Second Phase Project of Zhaokou Irrigation District of the Yellow River in Henan Province, Kaifeng 475000, China)

  • Qiang Ma

    (Construction Administration of the Second Phase Project of Zhaokou Irrigation District of the Yellow River in Henan Province, Kaifeng 475000, China)

Abstract

In the process of economic development, the exploitation and utilization of resources has played an important role, but the subsequent post-mining collapse and the shortage of land resources have affected future reconstruction to a certain extent. Currently, there is a firm belief in sustainable development and its goals to be achieved in the future. Based on the concept of sustainable development, this paper examines the feasibility of rebuilding channels under adverse geological conditions, and studies whether there are risks and the degree of risk. According to the characteristics of the experts’ judgment language and the ambiguity and randomness between various factors, it is proposed that a cloud model is used to improve the AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) risk assessment method. At the same time, the traditional matter–element theory is improved through the cloud model, so that the impact of uncertainty and randomness can be comprehensively considered in the evaluation; finally, forming the risk assessment system of the cloud-based AHP and cloud-based matter–elements. The application of examples shows that, compared with the methods in the relevant literature, the evaluation results of this article are more objective, more accurate, have better applicability, and play an important guiding role in channel construction under adverse geological conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Qingfu Li & Zhipeng Wang & Linfang Lu & Qiang Ma, 2021. "Construction Risk Evaluation of Poor Geological Channels Based on Cloud Model-Improved AHP–Matter–Element Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-22, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:17:p:9632-:d:623180
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/17/9632/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/17/9632/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ardamanbir Singh Sidhu & Sehijpal Singh & Raman Kumar & Danil Yurievich Pimenov & Khaled Giasin, 2021. "Prioritizing Energy-Intensive Machining Operations and Gauging the Influence of Electric Parameters: An Industrial Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-39, August.
    2. Martha Orellano & Christine Lambey-Checchin & Khaled Medini & Gilles Neubert, 2021. "A Methodological Framework to Support the Sustainable Innovation Development Process : A Collaborative Approach," Post-Print hal-03341881, HAL.
    3. Hengjie Luan & Huili Lin & Yujing Jiang & Yahua Wang & Jiankang Liu & Pu Wang, 2018. "Risks Induced by Room Mining Goaf and Their Assessment: A Case Study in the Shenfu-Dongsheng Mining Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-17, February.
    4. Martha Orellano & Christine Lambey-Checchin & Khaled Medini & Gilles Neubert, 2021. "A Methodological Framework to Support the Sustainable Innovation Development Process : A Collaborative Approach," Post-Print hal-03328101, HAL.
    5. Jagienka Rześny-Cieplińska & Agnieszka Szmelter-Jarosz, 2019. "Assessment of the Crowd Logistics Solutions—The Stakeholders’ Analysis Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-26, September.
    6. Martha Orellano & Christine Lambey-Checchin & Khaled Medini & Gilles Neubert, 2021. "A Methodological Framework to Support the Sustainable Innovation Development Process: A Collaborative Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-18, August.
    7. T. Siddque & S. P. Pradhan, 2018. "Stability and sensitivity analysis of Himalayan road cut debris slopes: an investigation along NH-58, India," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 93(2), pages 577-600, September.
    8. Jun Dong & Dongxue Wang & Dongran Liu & Palidan Ainiwaer & Linpeng Nie, 2019. "Operation Health Assessment of Power Market Based on Improved Matter-Element Extension Cloud Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-25, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kadia Georges Aka & François Labelle, 2021. "The Collaborative Process of Sustainable Innovations under the Lens of Actor–Network Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-32, September.
    2. Eduardo Antonio Chang-Muñoz & Andrés Felipe Guarín-García & Yuneidis Charris-Sevilla & José Fernando Gallego-Nicholls & Cristina Santos-Rojo & Arturo Ortigosa-Blanch, 2023. "Innovation Activities and Their Impact on Product Innovation Results: Evidence from a Sectorial Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-15, April.
    3. Tariq Siddique & M. E. A. Mondal & S. P. Pradhan & M. Salman & M. Sohel, 2020. "Geotechnical assessment of cut slopes in the landslide-prone Himalayas: rock mass characterization and simulation approach," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 104(1), pages 413-435, October.
    4. Magdalena Mucowska, 2021. "Trends of Environmentally Sustainable Solutions of Urban Last-Mile Deliveries on the E-Commerce Market—A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-26, May.
    5. Pourrahmani, Elham & Jaller, Miguel, 2021. "Crowdshipping in last mile deliveries: Operational challenges and research opportunities," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    6. Wenbing Guo & Mingjie Guo & Yi Tan & Erhu Bai & Gaobo Zhao, 2019. "Sustainable Development of Resources and the Environment: Mining-Induced Eco-Geological Environmental Damage and Mitigation Measures—A Case Study in the Henan Coal Mining Area, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-34, August.
    7. Jianhua Cheng & Xiaolong Yang & Hui Wang & Hujun Li & Xuan Lin & Yapeng Guo, 2022. "Evaluation of the Emergency Capability of Subway Shield Construction Based on Cloud Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-23, October.
    8. Aleksandra Stanković & Milan Andrejić & Vukašin Pajić & Milorad Kilibarda & Dragan Djurdjević, 2023. "A Novel Survey-QFD-WASPAS Methodological Approach for Designing Crowd Storage Platforms: A Case Study of Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-32, May.
    9. Jun Dong & Dongran Liu & Xihao Dou & Bo Li & Shiyao Lv & Yuzheng Jiang & Tongtao Ma, 2021. "Key Issues and Technical Applications in the Study of Power Markets as the System Adapts to the New Power System in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-29, December.
    10. Ahmad Alharbi & Chantal Cantarelli & Andrew Brint, 2022. "Crowd Models for Last Mile Delivery in an Emerging Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-20, January.
    11. Anuj Mittal & Amy A. Marusak & Caroline C. Krejci & Narjes Sadeghiamirshahidi & K. Jamie Rogers, 2022. "Evaluating the Suitability of Crowd-Shipping Platforms for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-18, October.
    12. Raman Kumar & Shubham Sharma & Ranvijay Kumar & Sanjeev Verma & Mohammad Rafighi, 2023. "Review of Lubrication and Cooling in Computer Numerical Control (CNC) Machine Tools: A Content and Visualization Analysis, Research Hotspots and Gaps," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-44, March.
    13. Ahmad Alkharabsheh & Sarbast Moslem & Laila Oubahman & Szabolcs Duleba, 2021. "An Integrated Approach of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making and Grey Theory for Evaluating Urban Public Transportation Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-15, March.
    14. Hassan S. Hayajneh & Xuewei Zhang, 2020. "Logistics Design for Mobile Battery Energy Storage Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-14, March.
    15. Kang Ma & Yuxiu Zhang & Mengying Ruan & Jing Guo & Tuanyao Chai, 2019. "Land Subsidence in a Coal Mining Area Reduced Soil Fertility and Led to Soil Degradation in Arid and Semi-Arid Regions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-14, October.
    16. Dattatray Khamkar & Sainath Aher & Praveen Gawali & Sumedh Mhaske, 2022. "Investigating probable causes for predicting catastrophic landslides along NH-60 excavated through semi-arid basaltic terrain of Chandanapuri Ghat, Maharashtra, India," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 2362-2386, February.
    17. Zhaoxi Zhan & Wenna Xu & Lin Xu & Xinyue Qi & Wenjie Song & Chen Wang & Ziye Huang, 2022. "BIM-Based Green Hospital Building Performance Pre-Evaluation: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-21, February.
    18. Vasco Silva & António Amaral & Tânia Fontes, 2023. "Sustainable Urban Last-Mile Logistics: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-27, January.
    19. Qingyou Yan & Hua Dong & Meijuan Zhang, 2021. "Service Evaluation of Electric Vehicle Charging Station: An Application of Improved Matter-Element Extension Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-25, July.
    20. Nan Zhou & Hao Yan & Shuyin Jiang & Qiang Sun & Shenyang Ouyang, 2019. "Stability Analysis of Surrounding Rock in Paste Backfill Recovery of Residual Room Pillars," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-13, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:17:p:9632-:d:623180. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.