IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i15p8629-d607187.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Integrated Sustainable Construction Project’s Critical Success Factors (ISCSFs)

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmed S. El Touny

    (Construction Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44519, Egypt)

  • Ahmed H. Ibrahim

    (Construction Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44519, Egypt)

  • Hossam H. Mohamed

    (Construction Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44519, Egypt)

Abstract

A construction project is a dynamic and complex process that involves the identification and accurate fulfillment of the predetermined needs and requirements of the clients by the project team. There are many challenges and constraints that prevent the achievement of these predetermined and various requirements effectively and successfully, so the project team must face and overcome these challenges by identifying all the factors that help the project’s success. However, it is still unclear how to measure success for Egyptian construction projects. Despite the fact that several lists of literature-based factors have been compiled, the individual factors appear to be tabulated rather than grouped according to some criteria to aid in the analysis of their interactions and potential consequences. As such, the objective presented in this paper was to identify and prioritize integrated sustainable critical success factors (ISCSFs) that influence the performance of Egyptian construction projects to ensure successful construction projects. Critical success factors were identified and grouped into 2 major categories—(1) internal related factors and (2) external related factors—and 10 subcategories—(1) company-related factors; (2) project-related factors; (3) project management related factors; (4) resource/procurement-related factors (labors, materials, equipment and subcontractors); (5) human capital-related factors; (6) support-related factors (financial, human resources, security and legal and administration); (7) stakeholder-related factors (clients, consultants, project managers and end-users); (8) innovation, learning and growth-related factors; (9) country-related factors; and (10) industry-related factors in three distinct stages. In total, 140 factors were gathered from the literature review in the first stage. In the second stage, a brainstorming session was held in order to reduce the number of those factors and focus on the most important ones that influence project success; thus, 100 factors were identified, filtered and developed. In the third stage, a questionnaire was created based on the significant factors identified. As a result, the 40 most important factors influencing the success of performance of construction projects have been identified, which are integrated between all factors (internal and external) and take into account the three pillars of sustainability (economic, social and environmental) as a decision-making tool to evaluate and improve project performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmed S. El Touny & Ahmed H. Ibrahim & Hossam H. Mohamed, 2021. "An Integrated Sustainable Construction Project’s Critical Success Factors (ISCSFs)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-26, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:15:p:8629-:d:607187
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/15/8629/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/15/8629/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Murat Gunduz & Mohammed Almuajebh, 2020. "Critical Success Factors for Sustainable Construction Project Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Zuzana Papulová & Andrea Gažová & Maroš Šlenker & Jan Papula, 2021. "Performance Measurement System: Implementation Process in SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-19, April.
    3. Xiaer Xiahou & Yuchun Tang & Jingfeng Yuan & Tengyuan Chang & Ping Liu & Qiming Li, 2018. "Evaluating Social Performance of Construction Projects: An Empirical Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-16, July.
    4. Yoav Gal & Efrat Hadas, 2015. "Why Projects Fail: Knowledge Worker and the Reward Effect," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 6(4), pages 968-977, December.
    5. Jeffrey K. Pinto & John E. Prescott, 1990. "Planning And Tactical Factors In The Project Implementation Process," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(3), pages 305-327, May.
    6. Zhi-Jiang Liu & Paula Pypłacz & Marina Ermakova & Pavel Konev, 2020. "Sustainable Construction as a Competitive Advantage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-13, July.
    7. Dvir, D. & Lipovetsky, S. & Shenhar, A. & Tishler, A., 1998. "In search of project classification: a non-universal approach to project success factors," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(9), pages 915-935, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yi-Shin Lin & Jui-Sheng Chou & Chi-Hung Chiou, 2021. "Reengineered Governance Process for Assessing Core Public Infrastructure Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-21, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Engwall, Mats, 2003. "No project is an island: linking projects to history and context," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 789-808, May.
    2. Kumar Virender & Pandey Amrendra & Singh Rahul, 2023. "Project success and critical success factors of construction projects: project practitioners’ perspectives," Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, Sciendo, vol. 15(1), pages 1-22, January.
    3. Canales, Juan I. & Vila, Joaquim, 2004. "Strategy-making via participation," IESE Research Papers D/569, IESE Business School.
    4. Fanta Barry & Marie Sawadogo & Maïmouna Bologo (Traoré) & Igor W. K. Ouédraogo & Thomas Dogot, 2021. "Key Barriers to the Adoption of Biomass Gasification in Burkina Faso," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-14, June.
    5. Lin, Sheng-Hau & Huang, Xianjin & Fu, Guole & Chen, Jia-Tsong & Zhao, Xiaofeng & Li, Jia-Hsuan & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2021. "Evaluating the sustainability of urban renewal projects based on a model of hybrid multiple-attribute decision-making," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    6. Maqbool, Rashid, 2018. "Efficiency and effectiveness of factors affecting renewable energy projects; an empirical perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 944-956.
    7. Ramón López Rodríguez & Francisco R. Durán Villa & María José Piñeira Mantiñán, 2021. "The Lessons of Public–Private Collaboration for Energy Regeneration in a Spanish City. The Case of Txantrea Neighbourhood (Pamplona)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    8. Zehua Wang & Fachao Liang & Sheng-Hau Lin, 2023. "Can socially sustainable development be achieved through homestead withdrawal? A hybrid multiple-attributes decision analysis," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-18, December.
    9. Dennis Vegter & Jos van Hillegersberg & Matthias Olthaar, 2021. "Performance Measurement Systems for Circular Supply Chain Management: Current State of Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-18, November.
    10. Cobo-Benita, José Ramón & Rodríguez-Segura, Enrique & Ortiz-Marcos, Isabel & Ballesteros-Sánchez, Luis, 2016. "Innovation projects performance: Analyzing the impact of organizational characteristics," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(4), pages 1357-1360.
    11. Laura Montalbán-Domingo & Madeleine Aguilar-Morocho & Tatiana García-Segura & Eugenio Pellicer, 2020. "Study of Social and Environmental Needs for the Selection of Sustainable Criteria in the Procurement of Public Works," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-21, September.
    12. Nerkar, Atul A. & McGrath, Rita Gunther & MacMillan, Ian C., 1996. "Three facets of satisfaction and their influence on the performance of innovation teams," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 11(3), pages 167-188, May.
    13. Mahdieh Sabaghpour & Md. Nasiruzzaman & Md. Najibul Huq & Jamaludin Ibrahim, 2013. "Knowledge Management Strategies as a Competitive Advantage for Delivering Professional E-Government Services," Journal of Education and Vocational Research, AMH International, vol. 4(5), pages 134-138.
    14. Achintya Ghatak & Adarsh Garg, 2022. "Power transmission project: a framework to align project success with organization goal," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 13(4), pages 1817-1833, August.
    15. Kathy Eljiz & David Greenfield & Lila Vrklevski & Alison Derrett & David Ryan, 2022. "Large scale healthcare facility redevelopment: A scoping review," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(2), pages 691-714, March.
    16. Min Li & Tsung-Chih Hsiao & Chih-Cheng Chen, 2020. "Exploring the Factors of Cooperation between Artists and Technologists in Creating New Media Art Works: Based on AHP," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-22, September.
    17. Amri, Tariq Al & Otaibi, Naif Al & Marey-Perez, Manuel, 2023. "The Major Obstacles and Factors Facing Green Building in the KSA: A Background Study," OSF Preprints a352b, Center for Open Science.
    18. Marija Mosurović Ružičić & Mirjana Miletić & Marina Dobrota, 2021. "Does a National Innovation System Encourage Sustainability? Lessons from the Construction Industry in Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-19, March.
    19. Barrutia, Jose M. & Echebarria, Carmen & Aguado-Moralejo, Itziar & Apaolaza-Ibáñez, Vanessa & Hartmann, Patrick, 2022. "Leading smart city projects: Government dynamic capabilities and public value creation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    20. Gómez Sánchez, Mariam & Lalla-Ruiz, Eduardo & Fernández Gil, Alejandro & Castro, Carlos & Voß, Stefan, 2023. "Resource-constrained multi-project scheduling problem: A survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(3), pages 958-976.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:15:p:8629-:d:607187. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.