IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i15p8208-d599413.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

D-distance Risk Factor for Transmission Line Maintenance Management and Cost Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Waraporn Luejai

    (Electrical Power and Energy Engineering (EPE), The Sirindhorn International Thai-German Graduate School of Engineering (TGGS), King Mongkut’s University of Technology North Bangkok (KMUTNB), Bangkok 10800, Thailand)

  • Thanapong Suwanasri

    (Electrical Power and Energy Engineering (EPE), The Sirindhorn International Thai-German Graduate School of Engineering (TGGS), King Mongkut’s University of Technology North Bangkok (KMUTNB), Bangkok 10800, Thailand)

  • Cattareeya Suwanasri

    (Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, King Mongkut’s University of Technology North Bangkok (KMUTNB), Bangkok 10800, Thailand)

Abstract

In this paper, a D-distance risk factor was proposed to prioritize high-voltage transmission lines from high to low risk in transmission line maintenance and renovation management. Various conditions and importance assessment criteria together with the weighting and scoring method were proposed to calculate both the renovation and importance indices of transmission lines. The scores of different test methods and visual inspection were differentiated from zero to five as end-of-life to very good condition to evaluate the condition of the line and its components. Additionally, the scores of different importance criteria were modified to assess the line importance from low to high importance. Moreover, the analytic hierarchy process was applied to determine the important weight of all test methods and importance criteria, which were evaluated by utility experts. The renovation and importance indices were combined in a risk matrix to finally determine the risk of the line by using the D-distance technique. Later, the risk of every transmission line was plotted in a risk matrix to prioritize and manage maintenance tasks. Finally, a maintenance cost was analyzed by applying the D-distance risk factor and compared with the replacement cost of a new transmission line for maintenance planning and cost minimization. Twenty out of 115, 230 and 500 kV transmission lines fleet in Thailand were practically analyzed with actual data. The results were realistic to feasibly implement in a transmission system for sustainable management.

Suggested Citation

  • Waraporn Luejai & Thanapong Suwanasri & Cattareeya Suwanasri, 2021. "D-distance Risk Factor for Transmission Line Maintenance Management and Cost Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-14, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:15:p:8208-:d:599413
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/15/8208/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/15/8208/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrew Lukas Chojnacki, 2021. "Assessment of the Risk of Damage to 110 kV Overhead Lines Due to Wind," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-14, January.
    2. Edoardo Alessio Piana & Fabio Bignucolo & Alberto Donini & Roberto Spezie, 2018. "Maintenance of a High-Voltage Overhead Transmission Line: Sustainability and Noise Impact Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-22, February.
    3. Thomas L. Saaty & Luis G. Vargas, 2012. "Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process," International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, edition 2, number 978-1-4614-3597-6, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gonçalves, Ana & Marques, Margarida Correia & Loureiro, Sílvia & Nieto, Raquel & Liberato, Margarida L.R., 2023. "Disruption risk analysis of the overhead power lines in Portugal," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PA).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martina Artmann, 2013. "Response-Efficiency-Assessment: A Conceptual Framework For Rating Policy'S Efficiency To Meet Sustainable Development On The Example Of Soil Sealing Management," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(04), pages 1-33.
    2. Gözaçan Nazlıcan & Lafci Çisem, 2020. "Evaluation of Key Performance Indicators of Logistics Firms," Logistics, Supply Chain, Sustainability and Global Challenges, Sciendo, vol. 11(1), pages 24-32, February.
    3. Xianmei Wang & Hanhui Hu, 2017. "Sustainability in Chinese Higher Educational Institutions’ Social Science Research: A Performance Interface toward Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-18, October.
    4. Satheeskumar Navaratnam, 2022. "Selecting a Suitable Sustainable Construction Method for Australian High-Rise Building: A Multi-Criteria Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-17, June.
    5. Md Monjurul Islam & Tofael Ahamed & Ryozo Noguchi, 2018. "Land Suitability and Insurance Premiums: A GIS-based Multicriteria Analysis Approach for Sustainable Rice Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-28, May.
    6. Roberta Mele & Giuliano Poli, 2017. "The Effectiveness of Geographical Data in Multi-Criteria Evaluation of Landscape Services †," Data, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-11, February.
    7. Mariia Dushenko & Clemet Thærie Bjorbæk & Kenn Steger-Jensen, 2018. "Application of a Sustainability Model for Assessing the Relocation of a Container Terminal: A Case Study of Kristiansand Port," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, December.
    8. Hao-Chang Tsai & An-Sheng Lee & Huang-Ning Lee & Chien-Nan Chen & Yu-Chun Liu, 2020. "An Application of the Fuzzy Delphi Method and Fuzzy AHP on the Discussion of Training Indicators for the Regional Competition, Taiwan National Skills Competition, in the Trade of Joinery," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-19, May.
    9. Adiprasetyo, Teguh & Suhartoyo, Hery & Firdaus, Arief, 2017. "Developing Strategy for Advancing Organic Agriculture as Sustainable Agricultural Practice," INA-Rxiv wb37h, Center for Open Science.
    10. Mila Bravo & Dylan Jones & David Pla-Santamaria & Graham Wall, 2018. "Robustness of weighted goal programming models: an analytical measure and its application to offshore wind-farm site selection in United Kingdom," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 267(1), pages 65-79, August.
    11. Md. Arif Chowdhury & Hasnat Sabrina & Rashed Uz Zzaman & Syed Labib Ul Islam, 2022. "Green building aspects in Bangladesh: A study based on experts opinion regarding climate change," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(7), pages 9260-9284, July.
    12. Yeeun Shin & Suyeon Kim & Sang-Woo Lee & Kyungjin An, 2020. "Identifying the Planning Priorities for Green Infrastructure within Urban Environments Using Analytic Hierarchy Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-13, July.
    13. Maria Cerreta & Simona Panaro & Giuliano Poli, 2021. "A Spatial Decision Support System for Multifunctional Landscape Assessment: A Transformative Resilience Perspective for Vulnerable Inland Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-22, March.
    14. Hsiao, Yao-Jen & Chen, Jyun-Long & Huang, Cheng-Ting, 2021. "What are the challenges and opportunities in implementing Taiwan's aquavoltaics policy? A roadmap for achieving symbiosis between small-scale aquaculture and photovoltaics," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    15. Uroš Kramar & Dejan Dragan & Darja Topolšek, 2019. "The Holistic Approach to Urban Mobility Planning with a Modified Focus Group, SWOT, and Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchical Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-29, November.
    16. Alena Pauliková & Zdenka Gyurák Babeľová & Monika Ubárová, 2021. "Analysis of the Impact of Human–Cobot Collaborative Manufacturing Implementation on the Occupational Health and Safety and the Quality Requirements," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-15, February.
    17. Zsuzsanna Katalin Szabo & Zsombor Szádoczki & Sándor Bozóki & Gabriela C. Stănciulescu & Dalma Szabo, 2021. "An Analytic Hierarchy Process Approach for Prioritisation of Strategic Objectives of Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-26, February.
    18. Liu Fang & Peng Yanan & Zhang Weiguo & Pedrycz Witold, 2017. "On Consistency in AHP and Fuzzy AHP," Journal of Systems Science and Information, De Gruyter, vol. 5(2), pages 128-147, April.
    19. Huihua Chen & Hujun Li & Yige Wang & Baoquan Cheng, 2020. "A Comprehensive Assessment Approach for Water-Soil Environmental Risk during Railway Construction in Ecological Fragile Region Based on AHP and MEA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-17, September.
    20. Dinesh Seth & Minhaj Ahemad A. Rehman, 2022. "Critical success factors‐based strategy to facilitate green manufacturing for responsible business: An application experience in Indian context," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 2786-2806, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:15:p:8208-:d:599413. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.