IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i12p6538-d571012.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Approach to Sustainability Risk Assessment in Industrial Assets

Author

Listed:
  • Fco. Javier García-Gómez

    (Construction and Manufacturing Engineering Department, National Distance Education University (UNED), C/Juan del Rosal 12, 28040 Madrid, Spain)

  • Víctor Fco. Rosales-Prieto

    (Construction and Manufacturing Engineering Department, National Distance Education University (UNED), C/Juan del Rosal 12, 28040 Madrid, Spain)

  • Alberto Sánchez-Lite

    (Department of Materials Science and Metallurgical Engineering, Graphic Expression in Engineering, Cartographic Engineering, Geodesy and Photogrammetry, Mechanical Engineering and Manufacturing Engineering, School of Industrial Engineering, Universidad de Valladolid, P° del Cauce 59, 47011 Valladolid, Spain)

  • José Luis Fuentes-Bargues

    (PRINS Research Center, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain)

  • Cristina González-Gaya

    (Construction and Manufacturing Engineering Department, National Distance Education University (UNED), C/Juan del Rosal 12, 28040 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

Asset management, as a global process through which value is added to a company, is a managerial model that involves major changes in strategies, technologies, and resources; risk management; and a change in the attitude of the people involved. The growing commitment of companies to sustainability results in them applying this approach to all their activities. For this reason, it is relevant to develop sustainability risk assessment procedures in industrial assets. This paper presents a methodological framework for the inclusion of sustainability aspects in the risk management of industrial assets. This approach presents a procedure to provide general criteria, methodology, and essential mandatory requirements to be adopted for the identification, analysis, and evaluation of sustainability aspects, impacts, and risks related to assets owned and managed by an industrial company. The proposed procedure is based on ISO 55,000 and ISO 31,000 standards and was developed following three steps: a preliminary study, identification of sustainability aspects and sustainability risks/opportunities, and impact assessment and residual risks management. Our results could serve as a model that facilitates the improvement of sustainability analysis risks in industrial assets and could be used as a basis for future developments in the application of the standards to optimize management of these assets.

Suggested Citation

  • Fco. Javier García-Gómez & Víctor Fco. Rosales-Prieto & Alberto Sánchez-Lite & José Luis Fuentes-Bargues & Cristina González-Gaya, 2021. "An Approach to Sustainability Risk Assessment in Industrial Assets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-23, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:12:p:6538-:d:571012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/12/6538/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/12/6538/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Komninos Angelakoglou & Georgios Gaidajis, 2020. "A Conceptual Framework to Evaluate the Environmental Sustainability Performance of Mining Industrial Facilities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, March.
    2. Fco. Javier García-Gómez & Cristina González-Gaya & Víctor Fco. Rosales-Prieto, 2020. "An Approach to Health and Safety Assessment in Industrial Parks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-17, May.
    3. Mihaela Grubisic & Mustafa Nusinovic & Gorana Roje, 2009. "Towards Efficient Public Sector Asset Management," Financial Theory and Practice, Institute of Public Finance, vol. 33(3), pages 329-362.
    4. Ferrannini, Andrea & Barbieri, Elisa & Biggeri, Mario & Di Tommaso, Marco R., 2021. "Industrial policy for sustainable human development in the post-Covid19 era," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    5. Elizaveta Gavrikova & Irina Volkova & Yegor Burda, 2020. "Strategic Aspects of Asset Management: An Overview of Current Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-31, July.
    6. Chemweno, Peter & Pintelon, Liliane & Muchiri, Peter Nganga & Van Horenbeek, Adriaan, 2018. "Risk assessment methodologies in maintenance decision making: A review of dependability modelling approaches," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 64-77.
    7. Adolfo Crespo Marquez & Juan Francisco Gomez Fernandez & Pablo Martínez-Galán Fernández & Antonio Guillen Lopez, 2020. "Maintenance Management through Intelligent Asset Management Platforms (IAMP). Emerging Factors, Key Impact Areas and Data Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-19, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Damjan Maletič & Matjaž Maletič & Basim Al-Najjar & Boštjan Gomišček, 2020. "An Analysis of Physical Asset Management Core Practices and Their Influence on Operational Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-20, October.
    2. Bingqiang Li & Shan Wang & Nannan Dong & Jinzhi Li & Xi Li & He Yu, 2023. "Empirical Analysis of Subsidy Industrial Policy’s Effect on Export Innovation in the Chinese Manufacturing," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, November.
    3. Wang, Zankai & Le, Thanh Tiep, 2022. "The COVID-19 pandemic’s effects on SMEs and travel agencies: The critical role of corporate social responsibility," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 46-58.
    4. Konstantinos Kourtzanidis & Komninos Angelakoglou & Vasilis Apostolopoulos & Paraskevi Giourka & Nikolaos Nikolopoulos, 2021. "Assessing Impact, Performance and Sustainability Potential of Smart City Projects: Towards a Case Agnostic Evaluation Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-38, July.
    5. Yuegang Song & Ruibing Wu, 2022. "The Impact of Financial Enterprises’ Excessive Financialization Risk Assessment for Risk Control based on Data Mining and Machine Learning," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 60(4), pages 1245-1267, December.
    6. Hamzeh Soltanali & Mehdi Khojastehpour & José Torres Farinha & José Edmundo de Almeida e Pais, 2021. "An Integrated Fuzzy Fault Tree Model with Bayesian Network-Based Maintenance Optimization of Complex Equipment in Automotive Manufacturing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-21, November.
    7. Karar, Ahmed Noaman & Labib, Ashraf & Jones, Dylan, 2023. "Post-warranty maintenance strategy selection using shape packages process," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    8. Despoina Aktsoglou & Georgios Gaidajis, 2020. "A Case Study on Environmental Sustainability Assessment of Spatial Entities with Anthropogenic Activities: The National Park of Eastern Macedonia and Thrace, Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-17, June.
    9. Di Tommaso, Marco R. & Prodi, Elena & Di Matteo, Dante & Mariotti, Ilaria, 2022. "Local public spending, electoral consensus, and sustainable structural change," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 435-453.
    10. Caropul Mendes & Hugo Raposo & Ricardo Ferraz & José Torres Farinha, 2023. "The Economic Management of Physical Assets: The Practical Case of an Urban Passenger Transport Company in Portugal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-19, July.
    11. Saihi, Afef & Ben-Daya, Mohamed & As'ad, Rami, 2023. "Underpinning success factors of maintenance digital transformation: A hybrid reactive Delphi approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    12. Liu, Gehui & Chen, Shaokuan & Jin, Hua & Liu, Shuang, 2021. "Optimum opportunistic maintenance schedule incorporating delay time theory with imperfect maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    13. Tatyana Ponomarenko & Marina Nevskaya & Oksana Marinina, 2020. "An Assessment of the Applicability of Sustainability Measurement Tools to Resource-Based Economies of the Commonwealth of Independent States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-20, July.
    14. Tetiana Dedilova & Iaroslava Levchenko & Oleksandr Nosyriev & Svitlana Osypova, 2021. "Justification of regional development of industrial enterprises in the plane of their financial support: experience of Ukraine," Technology audit and production reserves, Socionet;Technology audit and production reserves, vol. 2(4(58)), pages 33-37.
    15. Ratchayuda Kongboon & Shabbir H. Gheewala & Sate Sampattagul, 2021. "Empowering a Sustainable City Using Self-Assessment of Environmental Performance on EcoCitOpia Platform," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-17, July.
    16. Yutong Song & Yong Deng, 2019. "A new method to measure the divergence in evidential sensor data fusion," International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, , vol. 15(4), pages 15501477198, April.
    17. Alexander Brem & Dominic T. J. O’Sullivan & Ken Bruton, 2021. "Advancing the Industrial Sectors Participation in Demand Response within National Electricity Grids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-26, December.
    18. Di Tommaso, Marco R. & Prodi, Elena & Pollio, Chiara & Barbieri, Elisa, 2023. "Conceptualizing and measuring “industry resilience”: Composite indicators for postshock industrial policy decision-making," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    19. Luis de la Torre Palacios & José Antonio Espí Rodríguez & Paulo Romero Martinez, 2021. "Economic, technological and sustainability-based qualifications with reference to Europe: Iberia’s new metal mining projects," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 34(2), pages 277-304, July.
    20. Cherepovitsyn, Alexey & Solovyova, Victoria & Dmitrieva, Diana, 2023. "New challenges for the sustainable development of the rare-earth metals sector in Russia: Transforming industrial policies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:12:p:6538-:d:571012. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.