IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i10p5514-d554920.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inequalities in the Exercise and Continuity in Building Engineering in Spain. Factor Analysis Including Gender Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Irantzu Recalde-Esnoz

    (Departamento de Tecnología de la Edificación, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain
    Departamento de Ciencias de la Educación, Universidad de Alcalá, Aulario María de Guzmán, 28804 Alcalá de Henares, Spain)

  • Daniel Ferrández

    (Departamento de Tecnología de la Edificación, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain)

  • Carlos Morón

    (Departamento de Tecnología de la Edificación, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain)

  • Guadalupe Dorado

    (Departamento de Lingüística Aplicada a la Ciencia y a la Tecnología, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28006 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

The building sector is one of the most relevant at world level in view of the percentage of gross domestic product (GDP) concerned, as well as the number of new jobs created. Nevertheless, it is a completely male-dominated industry. Different institutions and organisms, such as the Agenda 2030 and the Sustainable Development Goals, struggle to reduce gender inequality in different environments, including the working one. Aligned with these goals, this study provides the data exploited from the first survey regarding gender inequality within the professionals of the building engineering field in the Spanish population as a whole. This survey was developed in 2018 by the Spanish General Council of Technical Architecture and it was sent to its members. The sample involved 1353 cases. For this data mining, bivariate analyses were conducted in order to subsequently carry out a factor analysis and the socio–demographic composition of the dimensions found. Results exposed statistically meaningful differences in the eyes of women and men about those factors which facilitate practice and continuity in the profession. The most relevant conclusions drawn from the factor analysis reflect the existence of three factors: (1) work competences, (2) social capital and (3) physical appearance and being a man, dimensions in which women and men’s opinion was unevenly distributed.

Suggested Citation

  • Irantzu Recalde-Esnoz & Daniel Ferrández & Carlos Morón & Guadalupe Dorado, 2021. "Inequalities in the Exercise and Continuity in Building Engineering in Spain. Factor Analysis Including Gender Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-18, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:10:p:5514-:d:554920
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/10/5514/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/10/5514/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Donna Bridges & Elizabeth Wulff & Larissa Bamberry & Branka Krivokapic-Skoko & Stacey Jenkins, 2020. "Negotiating gender in the male-dominated skilled trades: a systematic literature review," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(10), pages 894-916, October.
    2. Andrew Dainty & Barbara Bagilhole & Richard Neale, 2000. "A grounded theory of women's career under-achievement in large UK construction companies," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 239-250.
    3. David Arditi & Pernilla Gluch & Marie Holmdahl, 2013. "Managerial competencies of female and male managers in the Swedish construction industry," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(9), pages 979-990, September.
    4. Abigail Powell & Katherine J. C. Sang, 2013. "Equality, diversity and inclusion in the construction industry," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(8), pages 795-801, August.
    5. Gerard H. Dericks & Florence T. T. Phua, 2020. "The occupational attractiveness of the built environment and the roles of individualism and collectivism: a hidden source of conflict and gender imbalance?," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(9), pages 773-788, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elena Casprini & Tommaso Pucci & Lorenzo Zanni, 2023. "From growth goals to proactive organizational resilience: first evidence in women-led and non-women-led Italian wineries," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 1017-1036, April.
    2. SAKA Najimu & MOYANGA Dorcas Titilayo & ADEGBEMBO Taiwo Fadeke, 2022. "Factors Limiting the Participation of Women Construction Professionals (WCPs) in the Nigerian Construction Sector (NCS)," Noble International Journal of Scientific Research, Noble Academic Publsiher, vol. 6(1), pages 1-9, March.
    3. Donna Bridges & Larissa Bamberry & Elizabeth Wulff & Branka Krivokapic‐Skoko, 2022. "“A trade of one's own”: The role of social and cultural capital in the success of women in male‐dominated occupations," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 371-387, March.
    4. Fanny Salignac & Natalie Galea & Abigail Powell, 2018. "Institutional entrepreneurs driving change: The case of gender equality in the Australian construction industry," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 43(1), pages 152-169, February.
    5. Bodolica, Virginia & Spraggon, Martin & Zaidi, Sahar, 2015. "Boundary management strategies for governing family firms: A UAE-based case study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 684-693.
    6. Liyaning (Maggie) Tang & Shaleeza Sohail & Emma Shorthouse & Larissa Sullivan & Matthew Williams, 2022. "Put Gender on the Tender in Australian Public Projects," World, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-11, September.
    7. Ceric Anita & Ivic Ivona, 2020. "Construction labor and skill shortages in Croatia: causes and response strategies," Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 2232-2244, January.
    8. Kosa Golić & Vesna Kosorić & Tatjana Kosić & Slavica Stamatović Vučković & Kosara Kujundžić, 2023. "A Platform of Critical Barriers to Socially Sustainable Residential Buildings: Experts’ Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-33, May.
    9. Tamika Perrott, 2016. "Beyond ‘Token’ Firefighters: Exploring Women's Experiences of Gender and Identity at Work," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 21(1), pages 51-64, February.
    10. Thwala W.D, 2012. "Motivators of Construction Workers in the South African Construction Sites: A Case Study," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 4(11), pages 625-634.
    11. Aaron S. Howe & Joyce Lo & Sharan Jaswal & Ali Bani-Fatemi & Vijay Kumar Chattu & Behdin Nowrouzi-Kia, 2023. "Engaging Employers in Apprentice Training: Focus Group Insights from Small-to-Medium-Sized Employers in Ontario, Canada," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-17, January.
    12. Andrew Dainty & Barbara Bagilhole, 2005. "Guest Editorial," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(10), pages 995-1000.
    13. Ram, Jiwat, 2023. "Investigating staff capabilities to make projects resilient: A systematic literature review and future directions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    14. Jimoh Richard Ajayi & Bajere Paul Abayomi & Oyewobi Luqman Oyekunle & Adamu Amina Nna, 2016. "Women professionals’ participation in the nigerian construction industry: finding voice for the voiceless," Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, Sciendo, vol. 8(1), pages 1429-1436, December.
    15. Wendy O’Brien & Clare Hanlon & Vasso Apostolopoulos, 2023. "Women as leaders in male‐dominated sectors: A bifocal analysis of gendered organizational practices," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(6), pages 1867-1884, November.
    16. Elisa Peñalvo-López & Francisco-Javier Cárcel-Carrasco, 2019. "An Analysis about Learning to IncreaseWomen’s Participation and Employment in Europe’s Energy Transition: Evidence from the European Project MEnS," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-17, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:10:p:5514-:d:554920. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.