IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i7p2702-d338787.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Typical Challenges of Governance for Sustainable Regional Development in Globalized Latin America: A Multidimensional Literature Review

Author

Listed:
  • Alejandro Balanzo

    (Centro de Investigaciones y Proyectos Especiales CIPE, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Bogotá 111711, Colombia)

  • Leonardo Garavito

    (Centro de Investigación en Dinámicas Sociales CIDS, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Bogotá 111711, Colombia)

  • Héctor Rojas

    (Centro de Investigaciones y Proyectos Especiales CIPE, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Bogotá 111711, Colombia)

  • Lenka Sobotova

    (Centro de Investigaciones y Proyectos Especiales CIPE, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Bogotá 111711, Colombia)

  • Oscar Pérez

    (Centro de Investigaciones y Proyectos Especiales CIPE, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Bogotá 111711, Colombia)

  • Diego Guaquetá

    (Centro de Investigaciones y Proyectos Especiales CIPE, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Bogotá 111711, Colombia)

  • Alejandro Mojica

    (Colectivo Perspectiva Desarrollo, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Bogotá 111711, Colombia)

  • Juan Pavajeau

    (Colectivo Perspectiva Desarrollo, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Bogotá 111711, Colombia)

  • Sebastián Sanabria

    (Colectivo Perspectiva Desarrollo, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Bogotá 111711, Colombia)

Abstract

The paper aims to identify and analyze what types of governance challenges for sustainable regional development in the context of globalization are more frequently found in scholarship regarding Latin America. In order to do so, we carried out a systematic review of scholarly works discussing regional sustainability issues across the region. Analytically, it provides a heuristic multidimensional framework for organizing and typifying the most frequent sustainable regional development governance challenges under study, offering a nuanced and interrelated account of economic, environmental, political, and socio-spatial scientific discussions. According to our findings, scholarship on Latin America shows a bricolage-like scenery where political atomization linked to economic factionalism and fragmentation stand out as frequently analyzed situations. Another frequent topic relates to discussions about political endeavors linked to environmental concerns, connecting incidence strategies with collective environmental conservation approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Alejandro Balanzo & Leonardo Garavito & Héctor Rojas & Lenka Sobotova & Oscar Pérez & Diego Guaquetá & Alejandro Mojica & Juan Pavajeau & Sebastián Sanabria, 2020. "Typical Challenges of Governance for Sustainable Regional Development in Globalized Latin America: A Multidimensional Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-21, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:7:p:2702-:d:338787
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/7/2702/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/7/2702/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Natanya Meyer & Christelle Auriacombe, 2019. "Good Urban Governance and City Resilience: An Afrocentric Approach to Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-18, October.
    2. Luca Eufemia & Izabela Schlindwein & Michelle Bonatti & Sabeth Tara Bayer & Stefan Sieber, 2019. "Community-Based Governance and Sustainability in the Paraguayan Pantanal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-18, September.
    3. Lauri Siitonen, 2016. "Theorising Politics Behind Policy Coherence for Development (PCD)," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 28(1), pages 1-12, January.
    4. Philip Lowe & Jeremy Phillipson, 2006. "Reflexive Interdisciplinary Research: The Making of a Research Programme on the Rural Economy and Land Use," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(2), pages 165-184, July.
    5. Janaka Siyambalapitiya & Xu Zhang & Xiaobing Liu, 2018. "Is Governmentality the Missing Link for Greening the Economic Growth?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-17, November.
    6. Dave Valler & Andrew Wood, 2010. "Conceptualizing Local and Regional Economic Development in the USA," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(2), pages 139-151.
    7. Andrew Wood & Dave Valler, 2010. "Editorial: Conceptualizing Local and Regional Economic Development in the United States," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(2), pages 137-138.
    8. Judit Oláh & Sándor Kovács & Zuzana Virglerova & Zoltán Lakner & Maria Kovacova & József Popp, 2019. "Analysis and Comparison of Economic and Financial Risk Sources in SMEs of the Visegrad Group and Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-19, March.
    9. Craig Johnson, 2001. "Local Democracy, Democratic Decentralisation and Rural Development: Theories, Challenges and Options for Policy," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 19(4), pages 521-532, December.
    10. Brandt, Patric & Ernst, Anna & Gralla, Fabienne & Luederitz, Christopher & Lang, Daniel J. & Newig, Jens & Reinert, Florian & Abson, David J. & von Wehrden, Henrik, 2013. "A review of transdisciplinary research in sustainability science," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 1-15.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Laura Zapata-Cantu & Fernando González, 2021. "Challenges for Innovation and Sustainable Development in Latin America: The Significance of Institutions and Human Capital," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-21, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Natanya Meyer & Christelle Auriacombe, 2019. "Good Urban Governance and City Resilience: An Afrocentric Approach to Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-18, October.
    2. Zeigermann, Ulrike & Böcher, Michael, 2020. "Challenges for bridging the gap between knowledge and governance in sustainability policy – The case of OECD ‘Focal Points’ for Policy Coherence for Development," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    3. Emmanuel Yeboah-Assiamah & Kobus Muller & Kwame Ameyaw Domfeh, 2018. "‘Complex crisis’ and the rise of collaborative natural resource governance: institutional trajectory of a wildlife governance experience in Ghana," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 20(5), pages 2205-2224, October.
    4. Abu Elias Sarker & Faraha Nawaz, 2019. "Clientelism, Partyarchy and Democratic Backsliding: A Case Study of Local Government Elections in Bangladesh," South Asian Survey, , vol. 26(1), pages 70-91, March.
    5. Antonio Jacintos Nieves & Gian Carlo Delgado Ramos, 2023. "Advancing the Application of a Multidimensional Sustainable Urban Waste Management Model in a Circular Economy in Mexico City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-23, August.
    6. Antonio J. Castro & Cristina Quintas-Soriano & Jodi Brandt & Carla L. Atkinson & Colden V. Baxter & Morey Burnham & Benis N. Egoh & Marina García-Llorente & Jason P. Julian & Berta Martín-López & Feli, 2018. "Applying Place-Based Social-Ecological Research to Address Water Scarcity: Insights for Future Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-13, May.
    7. Dirk†Jan Koch, 2018. "Measuring long†term trends in policy coherence for development," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 36(1), pages 87-110, January.
    8. Rafols, Ismael & Leydesdorff, Loet & O’Hare, Alice & Nightingale, Paul & Stirling, Andy, 2012. "How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between Innovation Studies and Business & Management," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(7), pages 1262-1282.
    9. Rau, Henrike & Goggins, Gary & Fahy, Frances, 2018. "From invisibility to impact: Recognising the scientific and societal relevance of interdisciplinary sustainability research," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 266-276.
    10. David Fourie & Cornel Malan, 2020. "Public Procurement in the South African Economy: Addressing the Systemic Issues," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-23, October.
    11. Juerges, Nataly & Jahn, Stephanie, 2020. "German forest management stakeholders at the science-society interface: Their views on problem definition, knowledge production and research utilization," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    12. Arora-Jonsson, Seema, 2016. "Does resilience have a culture? Ecocultures and the politics of knowledge production," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 98-107.
    13. Xie, Xiaofeng & Shi, Xinyu & Gu, Jing & Xu, Xun, 2023. "Examining the Contagion Effect of Credit Risk in a Supply Chain under Trade Credit and Bank Loan Offering," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    14. Magrini, Marie-Benoit & Anton, Marc & Cholez, Célia & Corre-Hellou, Guenaelle & Duc, Gérard & Jeuffroy, Marie-Hélène & Meynard, Jean-Marc & Pelzer, Elise & Voisin, Anne-Sophie & Walrand, Stéphane, 2016. "Why are grain-legumes rarely present in cropping systems despite their environmental and nutritional benefits? Analyzing lock-in in the French agrifood system," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 152-162.
    15. Knierim, Andrea & Schmid, Julia Christiane & Knuth, Ulrike, 2014. "Aktionsforschung Zur Anpassung An Den Klimawandel--Methodische Potentiale Und Herausforderungen Am Beispiel Eines Transdisziplinaren Verbundprojektes In Brandenburg Berlin," 54th Annual Conference, Goettingen, Germany, September 17-19, 2014 187298, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    16. Andersson, Krister, 2013. "Local Governance of Forests and the Role of External Organizations: Some Ties Matter More Than Others," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 226-237.
    17. Josep Lloret & Rafael Abós-Herràndiz & Sílvia Alemany & Rosario Allué & Joan Bartra & Maria Basagaña & Elisa Berdalet & Mònica Campàs & Arnau Carreño & Montserrat Demestre & Jorge Diogène & Eva Fontde, 2020. "The Roses Ocean and Human Health Chair: A New Way to Engage the Public in Oceans and Human Health Challenges," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-19, July.
    18. John, Beatrice & Luederitz, Christopher & Lang, Daniel J. & von Wehrden, Henrik, 2019. "Toward Sustainable Urban Metabolisms. From System Understanding to System Transformation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 402-414.
    19. Chad M. Baum & Christian Gross, 2017. "Sustainability policy as if people mattered: developing a framework for environmentally significant behavioral change," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 53-95, April.
    20. Liina Tõnisson & Yvonne Kunz & Simonas Kecorius & Leizel Madueño & Everlyn Gayle Tamayo & Dang Marviluz Casanova & Qi Zhao & Tamara Schikowski & Anna-Katharina Hornidge & Alfred Wiedensohler & Andreas, 2020. "From Transfer to Knowledge Co-Production: A Transdisciplinary Research Approach to Reduce Black Carbon Emissions in Metro Manila, Philippines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-19, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:7:p:2702-:d:338787. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.