IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i4p1635-d323741.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Substantiating the Logistics Chain Structure While Servicing the Flow of Requests for Road Transport Deliveries

Author

Listed:
  • Vitalii Naumov

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering, Cracow University of Technology, Warszawska 24, 31-155 Krakow, Poland)

Abstract

The selection of the delivery scheme is one of the most complicated problems and the results of its solution condition the sustainable development of the whole market of transportation services. Freight forwarders should consider numerous random parameters characterizing demand and technological processes to choose the proper structure of the logistics chain. The paper aims to propose a method for choosing the logistics chain structure, based on the analysis of the total expenses as a function from the demand parameters characterizing stochastic variables of the consignment weight, the delivery distance, and the time interval between the requests in the flow of queries for cargo delivery. Four basic logistics chain structures, widely used on road transport, are described to demonstrate the selection process. The areas of the most efficient use of the logistics chain structures can be defined for the flow of requests for cargo deliveries. The paper shows such areas on the example of goods delivery by automobile transport. Determining the areas of the most efficient use of the specific logistics chain structures contributes to the effective choice of correct delivery variants by freight forwarders.

Suggested Citation

  • Vitalii Naumov, 2020. "Substantiating the Logistics Chain Structure While Servicing the Flow of Requests for Road Transport Deliveries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-23, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:4:p:1635-:d:323741
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/4/1635/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/4/1635/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yasmine Sabri & Guido J.L. Micheli & Cali Nuur, 2017. "How do different supply chain configuration settings impact on performance trade-offs?," International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 26(1), pages 34-56.
    2. Jahani, Hamed & Abbasi, Babak & Alavifard, Farzad & Talluri, Srinivas, 2018. "Supply chain network redesign with demand and price uncertainty," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 287-312.
    3. Gema Calleja & Albert Corominas & Carme Martínez-Costa & Rocío de la Torre, 2018. "Methodological approaches to supply chain design," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(13), pages 4467-4489, July.
    4. Maurício Fontoura Blos & Robson Marinho da Silva & Hui-Ming Wee, 2018. "A framework for designing supply chain disruptions management considering productive systems and carrier viewpoints," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(15), pages 5045-5061, August.
    5. Xufeng(Rax) Yao & Ronald Askin, 2019. "Review of supply chain configuration and design decision-making for new product," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(7), pages 2226-2246, April.
    6. Cui, Jianxun & Zhao, Meng & Li, Xiaopeng & Parsafard, Mohsen & An, Shi, 2016. "Reliable design of an integrated supply chain with expedited shipments under disruption risks," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 143-163.
    7. Jabbarzadeh, Armin & Haughton, Michael & Pourmehdi, Fahime, 2019. "A robust optimization model for efficient and green supply chain planning with postponement strategy," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 266-283.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vitalii Naumov & Olha Shulika & Oleksandra Orda & Hanna Vasiutina & Marek Bauer & Myroslav Oliskevych, 2022. "Shaping the Optimal Technology for Servicing the Long-Distance Deliveries of Packaged Cargo by Road Transport," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-17, June.
    2. Vitalii Naumov & Gaziza Zhumatayeva & Igor Taran & Madina Bazarbekova & Batyrbek Kenzhegaliyev, 2022. "Selecting a Rational Scheme of Delivery by Road Transport: A Case Study of Goods Deliveries from China to Russia through Kazakhstan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-15, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maiyar, Lohithaksha M. & Thakkar, Jitesh J., 2019. "Modelling and analysis of intermodal food grain transportation under hub disruption towards sustainability," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 281-297.
    2. He, Jian & Alavifard, Farzad & Ivanov, Dmitry & Jahani, Hamed, 2019. "A real-option approach to mitigate disruption risk in the supply chain," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 133-149.
    3. Jafarian, Ahmad & Rabiee, Meysam & Tavana, Madjid, 2020. "A novel multi-objective co-evolutionary approach for supply chain gap analysis with consideration of uncertainties," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    4. Han, Bing & Zhang, Ying & Wang, Song & Park, Yongshin, 2023. "The efficient and stable planning for interrupted supply chain with dual‐sourcing strategy: a robust optimization approach considering decision maker's risk attitude," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    5. Fatemeh Keshavarz-Ghorbani & Seyed Hamid Reza Pasandideh, 2022. "A Lagrangian relaxation algorithm for optimizing a bi-objective agro-supply chain model considering CO2 emissions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 314(2), pages 497-527, July.
    6. Zahra Homayouni & Mir Saman Pishvaee & Hamed Jahani & Dmitry Ivanov, 2023. "A robust-heuristic optimization approach to a green supply chain design with consideration of assorted vehicle types and carbon policies under uncertainty," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 324(1), pages 395-435, May.
    7. Alikhani, Reza & Torabi, S.Ali & Altay, Nezih, 2021. "Retail supply chain network design with concurrent resilience capabilities," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    8. ur Rehman, Attique & Shakeel Sadiq Jajja, Muhammad & Farooq, Sami, 2022. "Manufacturing planning and control driven supply chain risk management: A dynamic capability perspective," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    9. Li Liu & Zhe Wang & Jiangtao Xu & Zaisheng Zhang, 2023. "Green baton: how government interventions advance green technological innovation," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(10), pages 11121-11152, October.
    10. Shui Ming Li & Felix T. S. Chan & Yung Po Tsang & Hoi Yan Lam, 2021. "New Product Idea Selection in the Fuzzy Front End of Innovation: A Fuzzy Best-Worst Method and Group Decision-Making Process," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-18, February.
    11. Aldrighetti, Riccardo & Battini, Daria & Ivanov, Dmitry, 2023. "Efficient resilience portfolio design in the supply chain with consideration of preparedness and recovery investments," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    12. Giménez-Palacios, Iván & Parreño, Francisco & Álvarez-Valdés, Ramón & Paquay, Célia & Oliveira, Beatriz Brito & Carravilla, Maria Antónia & Oliveira, José Fernando, 2022. "First-mile logistics parcel pickup: Vehicle routing with packing constraints under disruption," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    13. Mohamed El Abdellaoui & Gilles Pache, 2019. "Effects of disruptive events within the supply chain on perceived logistics performance," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 39(1), pages 41-54.
    14. Mahapatra, Santosh K. & Schoenherr, Tobias & Jayaram, Jayanth, 2021. "An assessment of factors contributing to firms’ carbon footprint reduction efforts," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    15. Yin, Zhe & Wang, Chen & Yin, Qian, 2018. "Coordinating overseas and local sourcing through a capacitated expediting transportation policy," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 258-271.
    16. Lin Chen & Ting Dong & Jin Peng & Dan Ralescu, 2023. "Uncertainty Analysis and Optimization Modeling with Application to Supply Chain Management: A Systematic Review," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-45, May.
    17. Martinez-Valencia, Lina & Garcia-Perez, Manuel & Wolcott, Michael P., 2021. "Supply chain configuration of sustainable aviation fuel: Review, challenges, and pathways for including environmental and social benefits," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    18. Alavi Fard, Farzad & He, Jian & Ivanov, Dmitry & Jie, Ferry, 2019. "A utility adjusted newsvendor model with stochastic demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 154-165.
    19. Bassma Azzamouri & Vincent Hovelaque, 2024. "An integrated steering approach to improve a phosphate supply chain efficiency," Post-Print hal-04418207, HAL.
    20. Singa Wang Chiu & Liang-Wei You & Tsu-Ming Yeh & Tiffany Chiu, 2020. "The Collective Influence of Component Commonality, Adjustable-Rate, Postponement, and Rework on Multi-Item Manufacturing Decision," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-18, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:4:p:1635-:d:323741. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.