IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i22p9412-d443723.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Service Quality and Service Gap of Autonomous Driving Group Rapid Transit System

Author

Listed:
  • Wei-Hsi Hung

    (Department of Management Information Systems, National Chengchi University, Taipei 11605, Taiwan)

  • Yao-Tang Hsu

    (Department of Management Information Systems, National Chengchi University, Taipei 11605, Taiwan)

Abstract

Recently, the trend of public transportation has evolved from traditional vehicles to intelligent transportation systems. Among many innovative systems, the development of group rapid transit (GRT) has become increasingly important. This study aims to explore the key acceptance factors for users to adopt GRT through three dimensions: technology, sharing, and experiential marketing (TSE). First, this study identifies variables under each construct of the TSE model through a literature review and interviews with experts, so as to understand what factors of the model impact users’ usage intention and continuous usage intention. Subsequently, through a questionnaire survey, the theoretical model is verified. The participants of the survey were users of GRT, and a total of 306 valid questionnaires were collected. Through structural equation modeling (SEM) analysis, the results indicate that technology does not significantly impact usage intention, as users may not fully understand GRT’s future developments; technology only affects continuous usage intention. Sharing also only influences continuous usage intention. These results show that the adoption of GRT may be gradual and long-term rather than short-term. Finally, experiential marketing has a significant impact on both usage intention and continuous usage intention. This implies that users’ experiences are vital in promoting innovative services, hence service providers should seek to not only improve the service but also enhance users’ trust in and support for the service.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei-Hsi Hung & Yao-Tang Hsu, 2020. "Service Quality and Service Gap of Autonomous Driving Group Rapid Transit System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-18, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:22:p:9412-:d:443723
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/22/9412/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/22/9412/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J.J. Brakus & B.H. Schmitt & L. Zarantonello, 2009. "Brand Experience: What Is It? How Do We Measure It? And Does It Affect Loyalty?," Post-Print hal-00799102, HAL.
    2. M. Eugenia López-Lambas & Andrea Alonso, 2019. "The Driverless Bus: An Analysis of Public Perceptions and Acceptability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-15, September.
    3. John Lees-Miller, 2016. "Minimising average passenger waiting time in personal rapid transit systems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 236(2), pages 405-424, January.
    4. Juho Hamari & Mimmi Sjöklint & Antti Ukkonen, 2016. "The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 67(9), pages 2047-2059, September.
    5. Bradford, Marianne & Earp, Julia B. & Grabski, Severin, 2014. "Centralized end-to-end identity and access management and ERP systems: A multi-case analysis using the Technology Organization Environment framework," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 149-165.
    6. Michael R. Galbreth & Bikram Ghosh & Mikhael Shor, 2012. "Social Sharing of Information Goods: Implications for Pricing and Profits," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 603-620, July.
    7. John D. Lees-Miller, 2016. "Minimising average passenger waiting time in personal rapid transit systems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 236(2), pages 405-424, January.
    8. Viswanath Venkatesh & Fred D. Davis, 2000. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 186-204, February.
    9. Natalia Wagner & Roma Strulak-Wójcikiewicz & Anna Landowska, 2019. "Trust in Sharing Economy Business Models from the Perspective of Customers in Szczecin, Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-26, December.
    10. Margaret Meiling Luo & Ja-Shen Chen & Russell K.H. Ching & Chu-Chi Liu, 2010. "An examination of the effects of virtual experiential marketing on online customer intentions and loyalty," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(13), pages 2163-2191, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abbes, Intissar & Hallem, Yousra & Taga, Nadia, 2020. "Second-hand shopping and brand loyalty: The role of online collaborative redistribution platforms," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    2. Yu Wang & Shanyong Wang & Jing Wang & Jiuchang Wei & Chenglin Wang, 2020. "An empirical study of consumers’ intention to use ride-sharing services: using an extended technology acceptance model," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 397-415, February.
    3. Joan Torrent-Sellens & Cristian Salazar-Concha & Pilar Ficapal-Cusí & Francesc Saigí-Rubió, 2021. "Using Digital Platforms to Promote Blood Donation: Motivational and Preliminary Evidence from Latin America and Spain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-17, April.
    4. JooSeok Oh & Timothy Paul Connerton & Hyun-Jung Kim, 2019. "The Rediscovery of Brand Experience Dimensions with Big Data Analysis: Building for a Sustainable Brand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-21, September.
    5. Mohammadbashir Sedighi & Hamideh Parsaeiyan & Yashar Araghi, 2021. "An Empirical Study of Intention to Continue Using of Digital Ride-hailing Platforms," The Review of Socionetwork Strategies, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 489-515, November.
    6. José Alberto Martínez-González & Eduardo Parra-López & Almudena Barrientos-Báez, 2021. "Young Consumers’ Intention to Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Integrated Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, January.
    7. Hu, Beibei & Xia, Xuanxuan & Sun, Huijun & Dong, Xianlei, 2019. "Understanding the imbalance of the taxi market: From the high-quality customer’s perspective," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 535(C).
    8. Banu Demirel & Ayça Kübra Hızarcı Payne, 2018. "Social Innovation Adoption Behavior: The Case of Zumbara," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(02), pages 1-19, April.
    9. Jagienka Rześny-Cieplińska & Agnieszka Szmelter-Jarosz, 2019. "Assessment of the Crowd Logistics Solutions—The Stakeholders’ Analysis Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-26, September.
    10. Patrizia Gazzola & Elena‐Mădălina Vătămănescu & Andreia Gabriela Andrei & Chiara Marrapodi, 2019. "Users' motivations to participate in the sharing economy: Moving from profits toward sustainable development," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(4), pages 741-751, July.
    11. Andrei Boar & Ramon Bastida & Frederic Marimon, 2020. "A Systematic Literature Review. Relationships between the Sharing Economy, Sustainability and Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-14, August.
    12. Rahhal El Makkaoui, 2023. "Nature of Customer Experience in the Sharing Economy [La nature de l'expérience client dans l'économie collaborative]," Post-Print hal-04450139, HAL.
    13. Alesanco-Llorente, María & Reinares-Lara, Eva & Pelegrín-Borondo, Jorge & Olarte-Pascual, Cristina, 2023. "Mobile-assisted showrooming behavior and the (r)evolution of retail: The moderating effect of gender on the adoption of mobile augmented reality," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    14. Hallem, Associate Professor Yousra & Abbes, Associate Professor Intissar & Hikkerova, Professor Lubica & Taga, Media Planner Nadia, 2021. "A trust model for collaborative redistribution platforms:A platform design issue," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    15. Aijun Liu & Xiaohui Ji & Sang-Bing Tsai & Hui Lu & Gang Du & Feng Li & Guodong Li & Jiangtao Wang, 2018. "An Empirical Study on the Innovation Sharing Express Box: Collaborative Consumption and the Overlay Network Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, June.
    16. Meijian Yang & Enjun Xia, 2021. "A Systematic Literature Review on Pricing Strategies in the Sharing Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-28, August.
    17. Hung-Tai Tsou & Ja-Shen Chen & Cindy Yunhsin Chou & Tzu-Wen Chen, 2019. "Sharing Economy Service Experience and Its Effects on Behavioral Intention," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-25, September.
    18. Griffith, Denni Arli & van Esch, Patrick & Trittenbach, Makayla, 2018. "Investigating the mediating effect of Uber's sexual harassment case on its brand: Does it matter?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 111-118.
    19. Lo, Fang-Yi & Yu, Tiffany Hui-Kuang & Chen, Hsin-Hao, 2020. "Purchasing intention and behavior in the sharing economy: Mediating effects of APP assessments," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 93-102.
    20. Hadi Charkhgard & Mahdi Takalloo & Zulqarnain Haider, 2020. "Bi-objective autonomous vehicle repositioning problem with travel time uncertainty," 4OR, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 477-505, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:22:p:9412-:d:443723. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.