IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i21p9175-d440004.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Overview of Environmental Policies for Mitigation and Adaptation to Climate Change and Application of Multilevel Regression Analysis to Investigate the CO 2 Emissions over the Years of 1970 to 2018 in All Brazilian States

Author

Listed:
  • Anny Key de Souza Mendonça

    (Graduate Program in Production Engineering, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis 88040-900, Santa Catarina, Brazil)

  • Silvio Aparecido da Silva

    (Graduate Program in Production Engineering, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis 88040-900, Santa Catarina, Brazil)

  • Luísa Zeredo Pereira

    (Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis 88040-900, Santa Catarina, Brazil)

  • Antonio Cezar Bornia

    (Graduate Program in Production Engineering, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis 88040-900, Santa Catarina, Brazil
    Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis 88040-900, Santa Catarina, Brazil)

  • Dalton Francisco de Andrade

    (Graduate Program in Production Engineering, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis 88040-900, Santa Catarina, Brazil)

Abstract

Background: Brazil, one of the largest greenhouse gas emitting countries in the world, emitted approximately 2 billion gigatonnes of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) in 2018. This data is practically the same recorded in the previous year, suggesting that the country’s trajectory of CO 2 emissions is stabilized. Methods: This study presents an overview of environmental protection and climate change mitigation policies adopted in Brazil, as well as makes use the multilevel regression modeling technique to investigate the relationship between economic activities variables in relation to CO 2 emissions over the years of 1970 to 2018 in all Brazilian states. Results: The results show that the CO 2 emissions in the states have the same behavior as the timeline of the change in land use. Conclusions: The public policies and actions by society and the private sector were fundamental to the reduction verified from the year of 2004 that followed until 2010, both in CO 2 emissions and in the change in land use and forests. As of this year, there has been a trend towards stability in CO 2 emissions. Another important characteristic is that even with a drop in the number of deforestation, the production variables continued to grow, which shows that there may be an increase in production activities, while there is a reduction in deforestation and in CO 2 emissions.

Suggested Citation

  • Anny Key de Souza Mendonça & Silvio Aparecido da Silva & Luísa Zeredo Pereira & Antonio Cezar Bornia & Dalton Francisco de Andrade, 2020. "An Overview of Environmental Policies for Mitigation and Adaptation to Climate Change and Application of Multilevel Regression Analysis to Investigate the CO 2 Emissions over the Years of 1970 to 2018," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-18, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:21:p:9175-:d:440004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/21/9175/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/21/9175/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hongze Li & Bingkang Li & Hao Lu, 2017. "Carbon Dioxide Emissions, Economic Growth, and Selected Types of Fossil Energy Consumption in China: Empirical Evidence from 1965 to 2015," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-14, April.
    2. Alam, M. Shahid, 2006. "Economic Growth with Energy," MPRA Paper 1260, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Usama Al-Mulali & Ilhan Ozturk & Hooi Lean, 2015. "The influence of economic growth, urbanization, trade openness, financial development, and renewable energy on pollution in Europe," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 79(1), pages 621-644, October.
    4. Jacek Brożyna & Grzegorz Mentel & Eva Ivanová & Gennadii Sorokin, 2019. "Classification of Renewable Sources of Electricity in the Context of Sustainable Development of the New EU Member States," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-22, June.
    5. Nataly Echevarria Huaman, Ruth & Xiu Jun, Tian, 2014. "Energy related CO2 emissions and the progress on CCS projects: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 368-385.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Christian Di Stasi & Simona Renda & Gianluca Greco & Belén González & Vincenzo Palma & Joan J. Manyà, 2021. "Wheat-Straw-Derived Activated Biochar as a Renewable Support of Ni-CeO 2 Catalysts for CO 2 Methanation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-13, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alam, Md. Mahmudul & Murad, Md. Wahid, 2020. "The impacts of economic growth, trade openness and technological progress on renewable energy use in organization for economic co-operation and development countries," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 382-390.
    2. Natnaporn Aeknarajindawat & Boonsri Suteerachai & Pornkul Suksod, 2020. "The Impact of Natural Resources, Renewable Energy, Economic Growth on Carbon Dioxide Emission in Malaysia," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(3), pages 211-218.
    3. Guansheng Qi & Hao Hu & Wei Lu & Lulu Sun & Xiangming Hu & Yuntao Liang & Wei Wang, 2022. "Influence of Mine Environmental Factors on the Liquid CO 2 Pipeline Transport System with Great Altitude Difference," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-19, November.
    4. Olusegun Peter Olaoye & Aderemi Timothy Ayomitunde & Nwagwu Chinedu John & Yvonne Jude-Okeke & Azuh Dominic Ezinwa, 2020. "Energy Consumption and Foreign Direct Investment Inflows in Nigeria: An Empirical Perspective," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(2), pages 491-496.
    5. Afees A. Salisu & Umar B. Ndako & Idris Adediran, 2018. "Forecasting GDP of OPEC: The role of oil price," Working Papers 044, Centre for Econometric and Allied Research, University of Ibadan.
    6. Wan-Lin Yong & Jerome Kueh & Yong Sze Wei & Jang-Haw Tiang, 2020. "Energy Consumption and Economic Growth Nexus in China: Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL)," Journal of Public Administration and Governance, Macrothink Institute, vol. 10(2), pages 194212-1942, December.
    7. Lin, Boqiang & Okoye, Jude O., 2023. "Towards renewable energy generation and low greenhouse gas emission in high-income countries: Performance of financial development and governance," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    8. Li, Kunming & Fang, Liting & He, Lerong, 2019. "How population and energy price affect China's environmental pollution?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 386-396.
    9. Xiaolun Wang & Xinlin Yao, 2020. "Fueling Pro-Environmental Behaviors with Gamification Design: Identifying Key Elements in Ant Forest with the Kano Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-17, March.
    10. Carmen Díaz-Roldán & María del Carmen Ramos-Herrera, 2021. "Innovations and ICT: Do They Favour Economic Growth and Environmental Quality?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-17, March.
    11. Olimpia Neagu, 2019. "The Link between Economic Complexity and Carbon Emissions in the European Union Countries: A Model Based on the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-27, August.
    12. B. Venkatraja, 2021. "Does China exhibit any evidence of an Environmental Kuznets Curve? An ARDL bounds testing approach," Economic Thought journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 1, pages 88-110,111-.
    13. Acheampong, Alex O., 2019. "Modelling for insight: Does financial development improve environmental quality?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 156-179.
    14. Adhitya Wardhono & Panji Tirta Nirwana Putra & M. Abd. Nasir, 2016. "Causal study of macroeconomic indicators on carbon dioxide emission in ASEAN 5," ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(2), pages 15-31.
    15. Aleksandra Matuszewska-Janica & Dorota Żebrowska-Suchodolska & Urszula Ala-Karvia & Marta Hozer-Koćmiel, 2021. "Changes in Electricity Production from Renewable Energy Sources in the European Union Countries in 2005–2019," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-27, October.
    16. Chien, Fengsheng & Anwar, Ahsan & Hsu, Ching-Chi & Sharif, Arshian & Razzaq, Asif & Sinha, Avik, 2021. "The role of information and communication technology in encountering environmental degradation: Proposing an SDG framework for the BRICS countries," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    17. Moataz Elshimy & Khadiga M. El-Aasar, 2020. "Carbon footprint, renewable energy, non-renewable energy, and livestock: testing the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for the Arab world," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(7), pages 6985-7012, October.
    18. Isaac K. Ofori & Francesco Figari & Nathanael Ojong, 2023. "Towards sustainability: The relationship between foreign direct investment, economic freedom and inclusive green growth," Working Papers of the African Governance and Development Institute. 23/023, African Governance and Development Institute..
    19. Shen Zhao & Guanpeng Dong & Yong Xu, 2020. "A Dynamic Spatio-Temporal Analysis of Urban Expansion and Pollutant Emissions in Fujian Province," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-15, January.
    20. Le Hoang Phong, 2019. "Globalization, Financial Development, and Environmental Degradation in the Presence of Environmental Kuznets Curve: Evidence from ASEAN-5 Countries," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 9(2), pages 40-50.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:21:p:9175-:d:440004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.