IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i21p9134-d439326.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior to Identify Determinants of Donation Intention: Towards the Comparative Examination of Positive and Negative Reputations of Nonprofit Organizations CEO

Author

Listed:
  • Hyun Hye Kim

    (Department of Media and Communication, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul 03063, Korea)

  • EunKyoung Han

    (Department of Media and Communication, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul 03063, Korea)

Abstract

Using the extended theory of planned behavior, this study examined individuals’ cognitive and psychological determinants of their intentions to donate to nonprofit organizations (NPOs) with either a positive or negative chief executive officer (CEO) reputation. With the use of online survey data (n = 371), the similarities and differences in the relationships between the determinants were analyzed for the two NPO CEO reputations. To verify the hypotheses, multiple regression was used to analyze the data. The results reveal that for NPOs with positive CEO reputations, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control, moral norms, past behavior, and identification had positive effects on the intention to donate. In contrast, for NPOs with negative CEO reputations, subjective norms and identification had positive effects on the intention to donate. Attitude toward the NPO was not related to donation intentions regardless of the CEO’s reputation. These findings suggest the need for strategies to increase the public’s intentions to donate to problematic NPOs with negative reputations. Additionally, a strategy to further strengthen the intention to donate in the case of a positive CEO reputation is proposed. Theoretical and managerial implications of the results are also discussed, highlighting important considerations for CEO reputations and NPO management in the short and long terms.

Suggested Citation

  • Hyun Hye Kim & EunKyoung Han, 2020. "The Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior to Identify Determinants of Donation Intention: Towards the Comparative Examination of Positive and Negative Reputations of Nonprofit Organizations CE," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-19, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:21:p:9134-:d:439326
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/21/9134/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/21/9134/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Naomi E. Feldman, 2010. "Time Is Money: Choosing between Charitable Activities," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 2(1), pages 103-130, February.
    2. Oosterhof, Liesbeth & Heuvelman, Ard & Peters, Oscar, 2009. "Donation to disaster relief campaigns: Underlying social cognitive factors exposed," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 148-157, May.
    3. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    4. Luis Pérez y Pérez & Pilar Egea, 2019. "About Intentions to Donate for Sustainable Rural Development: An Exploratory Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-14, February.
    5. Eun Young Park & Jin Hwa Rhee, 2019. "Who Clicks on Online Donation? Understanding the Characteristics of SNS Users during Participation in Online Campaigns," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-15, July.
    6. Brown, Michael E. & Trevino, Linda K. & Harrison, David A., 2005. "Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 97(2), pages 117-134, July.
    7. Holmes, Jessica, 2009. "Prestige, charitable deductions and other determinants of alumni giving: Evidence from a highly selective liberal arts college," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 18-28, February.
    8. Goldberg, Marvin E & Hartwick, Jon, 1990. "The Effects of Advertiser Reputation and Extremity of Advertising Claim on Advertising Effectiveness," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 17(2), pages 172-179, September.
    9. Cheung, C. -K. & Chan, C. -M., 2000. "Social-cognitive factors of donating money to charity, with special attention to an international relief organization," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 241-253, May.
    10. Robert Mittelman & José Rojas-Méndez, 2018. "Why Canadians give to charity: an extended theory of planned behaviour model," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 15(2), pages 189-204, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kwanho Suk & Triza Mudita, 2021. "Charitable Organizations’ Cost Disclosure Mitigates Overhead Aversion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Heeseung Yu & Eunkyoung Han, 2021. "Developing a Measure for Online Shopping Mall Reputation (OSMR)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-16, March.
    3. Li-Ru Chen & Farn-Shing Chen & Der-Fa Chen, 2023. "Effect of Social Presence toward Livestream E-Commerce on Consumers’ Purchase Intention," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-15, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. M. Ülkü & Kathryn Bell & Stephanie Wilson, 2015. "Modeling the impact of donor behavior on humanitarian aid operations," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 230(1), pages 153-168, July.
    2. Saeed Awadh Bin-Nashwan & Adel Sarea & Meshari Al-Daihani & Abdullahi Bala Ado & Halima Begum & Mushari Hamdan Alosaimi & Hijattulah Abdul-Jabbar & Mohammed Khalifa Abdelsalam, 2022. "Fundraising Appeals for the COVID-19 Epidemic Fight: A Cross-Country Study of Donor Responses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-20, May.
    3. Baudier, Patricia & Kondrateva, Galina & Ammi, Chantal, 2023. "Can blockchain enhance motivation to donate: The moderating impact of religion on donors' behavior in the USA's charity organizations," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    4. Yuangao Chen & Ruyi Dai & Jianrong Yao & Yixiao Li, 2019. "Donate Time or Money? The Determinants of Donation Intention in Online Crowdfunding," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-21, August.
    5. Keval Amin & Erica Harris, 2022. "The Effect of Investor Sentiment on Nonprofit Donations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 175(2), pages 427-450, January.
    6. S. Hansen & Benjamin Dunford & Alan Boss & R. Boss & Ingo Angermeier, 2011. "Corporate Social Responsibility and the Benefits of Employee Trust: A Cross-Disciplinary Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 102(1), pages 29-45, August.
    7. Myung Ja Kim & C. Michael Hall, 2019. "Can Co-Creation and Crowdfunding Types Predict Funder Behavior? An Extended Model of Goal-Directed Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-23, December.
    8. Bela Florenthal & Manar Awad, 2021. "A cross-cultural comparison of millennials’ engagement with and donation to nonprofits: a hybrid U&G and TAM framework," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 18(4), pages 629-657, December.
    9. Oosterhof, Liesbeth & Heuvelman, Ard & Peters, Oscar, 2009. "Donation to disaster relief campaigns: Underlying social cognitive factors exposed," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 148-157, May.
    10. Julia Zhang & Randy Chiu & Liqun Wei, 2009. "Decision-Making Process of Internal Whistleblowing Behavior in China: Empirical Evidence and Implications," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 88(1), pages 25-41, April.
    11. Samah Ibnou-Laaroussi & Husam Rjoub & Wing-Keung Wong, 2020. "Sustainability of Green Tourism among International Tourists and Its Influence on the Achievement of Green Environment: Evidence from North Cyprus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-24, July.
    12. Robert Mittelman & José Rojas-Méndez, 2018. "Why Canadians give to charity: an extended theory of planned behaviour model," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 15(2), pages 189-204, June.
    13. S. Duane Hansen & Benjamin B. Dunford & Bradley J. Alge & Christine L. Jackson, 2016. "Corporate Social Responsibility, Ethical Leadership, and Trust Propensity: A Multi-Experience Model of Perceived Ethical Climate," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 137(4), pages 649-662, September.
    14. Nisar, Tahir M. & Prabhakar, Guru & Bourlakis, Michael, 2022. "Unravelling influential individual level factors during a crowdfunding campaign: Insights from the ALS ice bucket challenge," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    15. Angshuman Ghosh & Sanjeev Varshney & Pingali Venugopal, 2014. "Social Media WOM: Definition, Consequences and Inter-relationships," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 39(3), pages 293-308, August.
    16. Thomas Tang & Hsi Liu, 2012. "Love of Money and Unethical Behavior Intention: Does an Authentic Supervisor’s Personal Integrity and Character (ASPIRE) Make a Difference?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 107(3), pages 295-312, May.
    17. Qian Zhang & Yun Liu, 2019. "Employees’ Environmental Protection and Charitable Donation and Ethical Leadership: An Empirical Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-19, June.
    18. Myung Ja Kim & James F. Petrick, 2021. "Roles of constraint and attachment in crowdfunder behavior for sustainable development: An extended theory of planned behavior," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(4), pages 780-792, July.
    19. Luis Pérez y Pérez & Pilar Egea, 2019. "About Intentions to Donate for Sustainable Rural Development: An Exploratory Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-14, February.
    20. Yau-De Wang & Conna Yang, 2016. "How Appealing are Monetary Rewards in the Workplace? A Study of Ethical Leadership, Love of Money, Happiness, and Turnover Intention," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 129(3), pages 1277-1290, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:21:p:9134-:d:439326. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.