IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i18p7762-d416280.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Diffusion of Building Information Modeling in Building Projects and Firms in Singapore

Author

Listed:
  • Longhui Liao

    (Sino-Australia Joint Research Center in BIM and Smart Construction, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China)

  • Evelyn Ai Lin Teo

    (Department of Building, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117566, Singapore)

  • Ruidong Chang

    (School of Architecture and Built Environment, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide 5005, Australia)

  • Xianbo Zhao

    (School of Engineering and Technology, Central Queensland University, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia)

Abstract

Building information modeling (BIM) implementation has been mandated in building projects in Singapore, but a wider adoption is still desired. This study aims to investigate the factors influencing BIM diffusion and examine how the factors influence firms with different project roles, firm sizes, and BIM implementation experience. The results of a pilot study, a questionnaire survey with 89 professionals, and five post-survey interviews showed that hindrances related to inadequate multi-party collaboration (whether formal or informal), conservative mindset, limited skills, costly infrastructure and training, and multi-discipline model integration were the most influential, whereas drivers associated with project leadership team’s strategic consensus, multi-disciplinary design coordination, training, and government regulations were top-ranked. Subgroup analyses between pairs of firms with different characteristics revealed that while construction firms and less experienced stakeholders tended to underestimate BIM implementation difficulties, small-medium contractors might underestimate relevant benefits. The findings and managerial recommendations help different types of firms prioritize resources to overcome hindrances, seize opportunities (such as gaining a competitive edge from BIM practical experience), and obtain support from workers executing BIM daily. With major stakeholders’ recognition and implementation, BIM can be successfully diffused in building projects and firms. The Singapore government and other countries can refer to this study when further issuing BIM diffusion policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Longhui Liao & Evelyn Ai Lin Teo & Ruidong Chang & Xianbo Zhao, 2020. "Diffusion of Building Information Modeling in Building Projects and Firms in Singapore," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-23, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:18:p:7762-:d:416280
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7762/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7762/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nick Blismas & Christine Pasquire & Alistair Gibb, 2006. "Benefit evaluation for off-site production in construction," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 121-130.
    2. Heng Li & Weisheng Lu & Ting Huang, 2009. "Rethinking project management and exploring virtual design and construction as a potential solution," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(4), pages 363-371.
    3. Hongping Yuan & Yu Yang & Xiaolong Xue, 2019. "Promoting Owners’ BIM Adoption Behaviors to Achieve Sustainable Project Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-18, July.
    4. Longhui Liao & Evelyn Ai Lin Teo & Ruidong Chang & Linhui Li, 2020. "Investigating Critical Non-Value Adding Activities and Their Resulting Wastes in BIM-Based Project Delivery," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, January.
    5. Ghaffarianhoseini, Ali & Tookey, John & Ghaffarianhoseini, Amirhosein & Naismith, Nicola & Azhar, Salman & Efimova, Olia & Raahemifar, Kaamran, 2017. "Building Information Modelling (BIM) uptake: Clear benefits, understanding its implementation, risks and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 1046-1053.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bárbara Pedó & Carlos T. Formoso & Daniela D. Viana & Patricia Tzortzopoulos & Fernanda M. P. Brandalise & Andrew Whitelock-Wainwright, 2022. "Visual Management Requirements to Support Design Planning and Control within Digital Contexts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-27, September.
    2. Yasser Yahya Al-Ashmori & Idris Othman & Al-Hussein M. H. Al-Aidrous, 2022. "“Values, Challenges, and Critical Success Factors” of Building Information Modelling (BIM) in Malaysia: Experts Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qurratulain Malik & Abdur Rehman Nasir & Rabiah Muhammad & Muhammad Jamaluddin Thaheem & Fahim Ullah & Khurram Iqbal Ahmad Khan & Muhammad Usman Hassan, 2021. "BIMp-Chart—A Global Decision Support System for Measuring BIM Implementation Level in Construction Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-25, August.
    2. Yasser Yahya Al-Ashmori & Idris Othman & Al-Hussein M. H. Al-Aidrous, 2022. "“Values, Challenges, and Critical Success Factors” of Building Information Modelling (BIM) in Malaysia: Experts Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, March.
    3. Yingnan Yang & Yidan Zhang & Hongming Xie, 2020. "Exploring Cultivation Path of Building Information Modelling in China: An Analysis from the Perspective of an Innovation Ecosystem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-16, August.
    4. Yu Cao & Cong Xu & Syahrul Nizam Kamaruzzaman & Nur Mardhiyah Aziz, 2022. "A Systematic Review of Green Building Development in China: Advantages, Challenges and Future Directions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-29, September.
    5. José Ángel Aranda & Norena Martin-Dorta & Ferran Naya & Julián Conesa-Pastor & Manuel Contero, 2020. "Sustainability and Interoperability: An Economic Study on BIM Implementation by a Small Civil Engineering Firm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-16, November.
    6. Patrick Dallasega & Erwin Rauch, 2017. "Sustainable Construction Supply Chains through Synchronized Production Planning and Control in Engineer-to-Order Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-25, October.
    7. Tetiana Vlasenko & Anatolii Hatsko & Tetiana Larina & Yevhen Hryn & Dalia Streimikiene & Tomas Balezentis, 2019. "Fuzzy Evaluation of Change Management Processes in the Context of Enterprise Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-11, November.
    8. Truong Dang Hoang Nhat Nguyen & Hyosoo Moon & Yonghan Ahn, 2022. "Critical Review of Trends in Modular Integrated Construction Research with a Focus on Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-23, September.
    9. Filippos Lygerakis & Nikos Kampelis & Dionysia Kolokotsa, 2022. "Knowledge Graphs’ Ontologies and Applications for Energy Efficiency in Buildings: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-32, October.
    10. Yu, Sisi & Liu, Yanfeng & Wang, Dengjia & Bahaj, AbuBakr S. & Wu, Yue & Liu, Jiaping, 2021. "Review of thermal and environmental performance of prefabricated buildings: Implications to emission reductions in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    11. Ravijanya Chippagiri & Ana Bras & Deepak Sharma & Rahul V. Ralegaonkar, 2022. "Technological and Sustainable Perception on the Advancements of Prefabrication in Construction Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-19, October.
    12. Min Ho Shin & Hye Kyung Lee & Hwan Yong Kim, 2018. "Benefit–Cost Analysis of Building Information Modeling (BIM) in a Railway Site," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-10, November.
    13. Yu Cao & Liyan Huang & Nur Mardhiyah Aziz & Syahrul Nizam Kamaruzzaman, 2022. "Building Information Modelling (BIM) Capabilities in the Design and Planning of Rural Settlements in China: A Systematic Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-34, October.
    14. Li Zhang & Laura Balangé & Kathrin Braun & Roberta Di Bari & Rafael Horn & Deniz Hos & Cordula Kropp & Philip Leistner & Volker Schwieger, 2020. "Quality as Driver for Sustainable Construction—Holistic Quality Model and Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-23, September.
    15. Seoyoung Jung & Seulki Lee & Jungho Yu, 2021. "Identification and Prioritization of Critical Success Factors for Off-Site Construction Using ISM and MICMAC Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-21, August.
    16. Mojtaba Noghabaei & Arsalan Heydarian & Vahid Balali & Kevin Han, 2020. "Trend Analysis on Adoption of Virtual and Augmented Reality in the Architecture, Engineering, and Construction Industry," Data, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-18, March.
    17. Quan Wen & Zhongfu Li & Yifeng Peng & Baorong Guo, 2020. "Assessing the Effectiveness of Building Information Modeling in Developing Green Buildings from a Lifecycle Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-20, November.
    18. Lu, Weisheng & Webster, Chris & Chen, Ke & Zhang, Xiaoling & Chen, Xi, 2017. "Computational Building Information Modelling for construction waste management: Moving from rhetoric to reality," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P1), pages 587-595.
    19. Oludolapo Ibrahim Olanrewaju & Ahmed Farouk Kineber & Nicholas Chileshe & David John Edwards, 2021. "Modelling the Impact of Building Information Modelling (BIM) Implementation Drivers and Awareness on Project Lifecycle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-23, August.
    20. Ricardo P. F. Ferrarez & Claudia G. B. do Valle & Jeferson C. Alvarenga & Fabricio da C. Dias & Diego A. Vasco & André L. A. Guedes & Christine K. Chinelli & Assed N. Haddad & Carlos A. P. Soares, 2023. "Key Practices for Incorporating Sustainability in Project Management from the Perspective of Brazilian Professionals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-21, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:18:p:7762-:d:416280. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.