IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i22p6310-d285523.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fuzzy Evaluation of Change Management Processes in the Context of Enterprise Sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Tetiana Vlasenko

    (Kharkiv Petro Vasylenko National Technical University of Agriculture, Alchevskykh St. 44, 61002 Kharkiv City, Ukraine)

  • Anatolii Hatsko

    (Kharkiv Petro Vasylenko National Technical University of Agriculture, Alchevskykh St. 44, 61002 Kharkiv City, Ukraine)

  • Tetiana Larina

    (Kharkiv Petro Vasylenko National Technical University of Agriculture, Alchevskykh St. 44, 61002 Kharkiv City, Ukraine)

  • Yevhen Hryn

    (Kharkiv Petro Vasylenko National Technical University of Agriculture, Alchevskykh St. 44, 61002 Kharkiv City, Ukraine)

  • Dalia Streimikiene

    (Lithuanian Institute of Agrarian Economics, A. Vivulskio Str. 4A, 03220 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Tomas Balezentis

    (Lithuanian Institute of Agrarian Economics, A. Vivulskio Str. 4A, 03220 Vilnius, Lithuania)

Abstract

Enterprise sustainability can only be ensured by taking into account the dynamics of the environment, which requires effective implementation of changes. Organizational change management is seen as the interaction of the groups of processes: direct implementation and the processes of managerial influence on their implementation. The article seeks to develop a framework for evaluation of change management processes based on the fuzzy logics. The expert analysis was carried out to develop fuzzy rules based on the linguistic terms (high, medium, and low). The database of rules for assigning an enterprise to the appropriate level of organizational change management has been developed (243 rules). The proposed model was applied to the case of Ukrainian agricultural machinery companies. The results allowed identifying the bottlenecks for the companies under analysis in seeking sustainable change management.

Suggested Citation

  • Tetiana Vlasenko & Anatolii Hatsko & Tetiana Larina & Yevhen Hryn & Dalia Streimikiene & Tomas Balezentis, 2019. "Fuzzy Evaluation of Change Management Processes in the Context of Enterprise Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-11, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:22:p:6310-:d:285523
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/22/6310/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/22/6310/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anton Oleinik, 2018. "EOpen Economy or Protectionism: Ukraine’s Dilemma," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 14(3), pages 109-127.
    2. Hongping Yuan & Yu Yang & Xiaolong Xue, 2019. "Promoting Owners’ BIM Adoption Behaviors to Achieve Sustainable Project Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-18, July.
    3. Michal Pohludka & Hana Stverkova & Beata Ślusarczyk, 2018. "Implementation and Unification of the ERP System in a Global Company as a Strategic Decision for Sustainable Entrepreneurship," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, August.
    4. Kwang O. Park, 2018. "The Relationship between BPR Strategy and Change Management for the Sustainable Implementation of ERP: An Information Orientation Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-17, August.
    5. Song, Malin & Fisher, Ron & Kwoh, Yusen, 2019. "Technological challenges of green innovation and sustainable resource management with large scale data," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 361-368.
    6. Stefan Schaltegger, 2011. "Sustainability as a driver for corporate economic success," Society and Economy, Akadémiai Kiadó, Hungary, vol. 33(1), pages 15-28, April.
    7. Fawad Ahmed & Yuan Jian Qin & Luis Martínez, 2019. "Sustainable Change Management through Employee Readiness: Decision Support System Adoption in Technology-Intensive British E-Businesses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-28, May.
    8. Thomas Dyllick & Kai Hockerts, 2002. "Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(2), pages 130-141, March.
    9. Serhii Kozlovskyi & Hennadii Mazur & Nataliia Vdovenko & Tetiana Shepel & Volodymyr Kozlovskyi, 2018. "Modeling and Forecasting the Level of State Stimulation of Agricultural Production in Ukraine Based on the Theory of Fuzzy Logic," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 14(3), pages 37-53.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Justyna Patalas-Maliszewska & Hanna Łosyk, 2020. "An Approach to Assessing Sustainability in the Development of a Manufacturing Company," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-18, October.
    2. María Luisa Pajuelo Moreno & Teresa Duarte-Atoche, 2019. "Relationship between Sustainable Disclosure and Performance—An Extension of Ullmann’s Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-33, August.
    3. Erik G. Hansen & Stefan Schaltegger, 2016. "The Sustainability Balanced Scorecard: A Systematic Review of Architectures," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 133(2), pages 193-221, January.
    4. Raul Oltra-Badenes & Hermenegildo Gil-Gomez & Vicente Guerola-Navarro & Pau Vicedo, 2019. "Is It Possible to Manage the Product Recovery Processes in an ERP? Analysis of Functional Needs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-16, August.
    5. Giacomo Fabietti & Francesca Trovarelli, 2016. "The role of Eco-control in the implementation of Sustainable Business Models," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(3), pages 141-172.
    6. Arthur Jin Lin & Hai-Yen Chang, 2019. "Business Sustainability Performance Evaluation for Taiwanese Banks—A Hybrid Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-26, April.
    7. Barbara Brenner, 2018. "Transformative Sustainable Business Models in the Light of the Digital Imperative—A Global Business Economics Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-25, November.
    8. Fabio Caputo & Stefania Veltri & Andrea Venturelli, 2017. "Sustainability Strategy and Management Control Systems in Family Firms. Evidence from a Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-23, June.
    9. Roger Leonard Burritt & Katherine Leanne Christ & Hussain Gulzar Rammal & Stefan Schaltegger, 2020. "Multinational Enterprise Strategies for Addressing Sustainability: the Need for Consolidation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 164(2), pages 389-410, June.
    10. Stefan Schaltegger & Roger Burritt, 2018. "Business Cases and Corporate Engagement with Sustainability: Differentiating Ethical Motivations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 147(2), pages 241-259, January.
    11. Belén Derqui, 2020. "Towards sustainable development: Evolution of corporate sustainability in multinational firms," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(6), pages 2712-2723, November.
    12. Patricio Ramírez-Correa & Elizabeth E. Grandón & Jorge Alfaro-Pérez & Giselle Painén-Aravena, 2019. "Personality Types as Moderators of the Acceptance of Information Technologies in Organizations: A Multi-Group Analysis in PLS-SEM," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-15, July.
    13. Trin Thananusak, 2019. "Science Mapping of the Knowledge Base on Sustainable Entrepreneurship, 1996–2019," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-20, June.
    14. Maria Björklund & Helena Forslund, 2019. "Challenges Addressed by Swedish Third-Party Logistics Providers Conducting Sustainable Logistics Business Cases," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-15, May.
    15. Merriam Haffar & Cory Searcy, 2018. "Target‐setting for ecological resilience: Are companies setting environmental sustainability targets in line with planetary thresholds?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(7), pages 1079-1092, November.
    16. Pishchulov, Grigory & Trautrims, Alexander & Chesney, Thomas & Gold, Stefan & Schwab, Leila, 2019. "The Voting Analytic Hierarchy Process revisited: A revised method with application to sustainable supplier selection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 166-179.
    17. Simone Carmine & Valentina De Marchi, 2023. "Reviewing Paradox Theory in Corporate Sustainability Toward a Systems Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 184(1), pages 139-158, April.
    18. Bert Scholtens & Feng‐Ching Kang, 2013. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Earnings Management: Evidence from Asian Economies," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(2), pages 95-112, March.
    19. Fabien Martinez, 2014. "Corporate strategy and the environment: towards a four-dimensional compatibility model for fostering green management decisions," Post-Print hal-02887618, HAL.
    20. Veronica Devenin & Constanza Bianchi, 2018. "Soccer fields? What for? Effectiveness of corporate social responsibility initiatives in the mining industry," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(5), pages 866-879, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:22:p:6310-:d:285523. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.