IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i17p7191-d408171.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Smart Farming Introduction in Wine Farms: A Systematic Review and a New Proposal

Author

Listed:
  • Daniele Sarri

    (Department of Agricultural, Food, Environment and Forestry, University of Florence, Piazzale Delle Cascine 15, 50144 Florence, Italy)

  • Stefania Lombardo

    (Department of Agricultural, Food, Environment and Forestry, University of Florence, Piazzale Delle Cascine 15, 50144 Florence, Italy)

  • Andrea Pagliai

    (Department of Agricultural, Food, Environment and Forestry, University of Florence, Piazzale Delle Cascine 15, 50144 Florence, Italy)

  • Carolina Perna

    (Department of Agricultural, Food, Environment and Forestry, University of Florence, Piazzale Delle Cascine 15, 50144 Florence, Italy)

  • Riccardo Lisci

    (Department of Agricultural, Food, Environment and Forestry, University of Florence, Piazzale Delle Cascine 15, 50144 Florence, Italy)

  • Valentina De Pascale

    (Department of Agricultural, Food, Environment and Forestry, University of Florence, Piazzale Delle Cascine 15, 50144 Florence, Italy)

  • Marco Rimediotti

    (Department of Agricultural, Food, Environment and Forestry, University of Florence, Piazzale Delle Cascine 15, 50144 Florence, Italy)

  • Guido Cencini

    (Department of Agricultural, Food, Environment and Forestry, University of Florence, Piazzale Delle Cascine 15, 50144 Florence, Italy)

  • Marco Vieri

    (Department of Agricultural, Food, Environment and Forestry, University of Florence, Piazzale Delle Cascine 15, 50144 Florence, Italy)

Abstract

This study shows a new methodological proposal for wine farm management, as a result of the progressive development of the technological innovations and their adoption. The study was carried out in Italy involving farmers, workers, or owners of wine farms who are progressively introducing or using precision agriculture technologies on their farm. The methodology proposed was divided in four stages (1. understanding the changes in action; 2. identifying the added value of Smart Farming processes; 3. verifying the reliability of new technologies; 4. adjusting production processes) that can be applied at different levels in vine farms to make the adoption of precision agriculture techniques and technologies harmonious and profitable. Data collection was carried out using a participant-observer method in brainstorming sessions, where the authors reflected on the significance of technology adoption means and how to put them in practice, and interviews, questionnaire surveys, diaries, and observations. Moreover, project activities and reports provided auxiliary data. The findings highlighted the issues of a sector which, although with broad investment and finance options, lacks a structure of human, territorial, and organizational resources for the successful adoption of technological innovations. The work represents a basis for the future development of models for strategic scenario planning and risk assessments for farmers, policymakers, and scientists.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniele Sarri & Stefania Lombardo & Andrea Pagliai & Carolina Perna & Riccardo Lisci & Valentina De Pascale & Marco Rimediotti & Guido Cencini & Marco Vieri, 2020. "Smart Farming Introduction in Wine Farms: A Systematic Review and a New Proposal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-26, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:17:p:7191-:d:408171
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/17/7191/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/17/7191/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dudin, Mikhail & Nikolaj Vasil'evich Lyasnikov & Valentina Nikolaevna Sidorenko & Lidija Sergeevna Leont'va & Konstantin Jur'evich Reshetov, 2015. "Business Model Canvas as a basis for competitive advantage of enterprise structures in agroindustrial sphere (english version)," Published Papers d151e, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.
    2. Wang, Zhen & Subramanian, Nachiappan & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Abdulrahman, Muhammad D. & Liu, Chang, 2015. "Composite sustainable manufacturing practice and performance framework: Chinese auto-parts suppliers׳ perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(PA), pages 219-233.
    3. André Aasrud & Richard Baron & Katia Karousakis, 2010. "Market Readiness: Building Blocks for Market Approaches," OECD/IEA Climate Change Expert Group Papers 2010/3, OECD Publishing.
    4. Maciejczak, Mariusz & Faltmann. Janis, 2018. "Assessing Readiness Levels Of Production Technologies For Sustainable Intensification Of Agriculture," APSTRACT: Applied Studies in Agribusiness and Commerce, AGRIMBA, vol. 12(1-2), June.
    5. Long, Thomas B. & Blok, Vincent & Poldner, Kim, 2016. "Business models for maximising the diffusion of technological innovations for climate-smart agriculture," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 20(1), September.
    6. Frits K. Van Evert & Daniel Gaitán-Cremaschi & Spyros Fountas & Corné Kempenaar, 2017. "Can Precision Agriculture Increase the Profitability and Sustainability of the Production of Potatoes and Olives?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-24, October.
    7. Olof Sivertsson & Joakim Tell, 2015. "Barriers to Business Model Innovation in Swedish Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-13, February.
    8. Andrea Chiarini, 2017. "Environmental Policies for Evaluating Suppliers' Performance Based on GRI Indicators," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(1), pages 98-111, January.
    9. Thoumy, Mira & Vachon, Stephan, 2012. "Environmental projects and financial performance: Exploring the impact of project characteristics," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 28-34.
    10. Pérez-Luño, Ana & Wiklund, Johan & Cabrera, Ramón Valle, 2011. "The dual nature of innovative activity: How entrepreneurial orientation influences innovation generation and adoption," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 26(5), pages 555-571, September.
    11. Michael MacLeod & Vera Eory & Guillaume Gruère & Jussi Lankoski, 2015. "Cost-Effectiveness of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures for Agriculture: A Literature Review," OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers 89, OECD Publishing.
    12. S. A. Montzka & E. J. Dlugokencky & J. H. Butler, 2011. "Non-CO2 greenhouse gases and climate change," Nature, Nature, vol. 476(7358), pages 43-50, August.
    13. Dudin, Mikhail & Nikolaj Vasil'evich Lyasnikov & Valentina Nikolaevna Sidorenko & Lidija Sergeevna Leont'va & Konstantin Jur'evich Reshetov, 2015. "Business Model Canvas as a basis for competitive advantage of enterprise structures in agroindustrial sphere," Published Papers d151, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.
    14. Longoni, Annachiara & Golini, Ruggero & Cagliano, Raffaella, 2014. "The role of New Forms of Work Organization in developing sustainability strategies in operations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(PA), pages 147-160.
    15. Athanasios T. Balafoutis & Stefanos Koundouras & Evangelos Anastasiou & Spyros Fountas & Konstantinos Arvanitis, 2017. "Life Cycle Assessment of Two Vineyards after the Application of Precision Viticulture Techniques: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-19, November.
    16. Lluís M Plà & Daniel L Sandars & Andrew J Higgins, 2014. "A perspective on operational research prospects for agriculture," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 65(7), pages 1078-1089, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chin-Ling Lee & Robert Strong & Kim E. Dooley, 2021. "Analyzing Precision Agriculture Adoption across the Globe: A Systematic Review of Scholarship from 1999–2020," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-15, September.
    2. Álvaro Ibáñez-Jiménez & Yolanda Jiménez-Olivencia & Ángela Mesa-Pedrazas & Laura Porcel-Rodríguez & Karl Zimmerer, 2022. "A Systematic Review of EU-Funded Innovative Agri-Food Projects: Potential for Transfer between Territories," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-26, April.
    3. Valda Rondelli & Enrico Capacci & Bruno Franceschetti, 2022. "Evaluation of the Stability Behavior of an Agricultural Unmanned Ground Vehicle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-13, November.
    4. António Abreu, 2021. "Innovation Ecosystems: A Sustainability Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-3, February.
    5. Eirini Aivazidou & Naoum Tsolakis, 2023. "Transitioning towards human–robot synergy in agriculture: A systems thinking perspective," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(3), pages 536-551, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna Vatsanidou & Spyros Fountas & Vasileios Liakos & George Nanos & Nikolaos Katsoulas & Theofanis Gemtos, 2020. "Life Cycle Assessment of Variable Rate Fertilizer Application in a Pear Orchard," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-25, August.
    2. Athanasios Balafoutis & Bert Beck & Spyros Fountas & Jurgen Vangeyte & Tamme Van der Wal & Iria Soto & Manuel Gómez-Barbero & Andrew Barnes & Vera Eory, 2017. "Precision Agriculture Technologies Positively Contributing to GHG Emissions Mitigation, Farm Productivity and Economics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-28, July.
    3. Liu, Yang & Zhu, Qinghua & Seuring, Stefan, 2017. "Linking capabilities to green operations strategies: The moderating role of corporate environmental proactivity," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 182-195.
    4. Athanasios T. Balafoutis & Stefanos Koundouras & Evangelos Anastasiou & Spyros Fountas & Konstantinos Arvanitis, 2017. "Life Cycle Assessment of Two Vineyards after the Application of Precision Viticulture Techniques: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-19, November.
    5. Qorri Aina* & Wardah Naili Ulfah & Sri Herliana & Sri Hartati, 2018. "Model of Value Proposition: Customer Interview and Development Process for Startup Business Product," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, pages 320-326:2.
    6. Simona Alfiero & Laura Broccardo & Massimo Cane, 2023. "Sustainable Business Model and the Firm Age Variable Impact: Evidence from wine industry," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2023(3), pages 165-191.
    7. Mihail Nikolaevich Dudin & Konstantin Yurievich Reshetov & Victor Ivanovich Mysachenko & Natalia Nikolaevna Mironova & Olga Vladimirovna Divnenko, 2017. "Green Technology and Renewable Energy in the System of the Steel Industry in Europe," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 7(2), pages 310-315.
    8. Theodora Karanisa & Alexandre Amato & Renee Richer & Sara Abdul Majid & Cynthia Skelhorn & Sami Sayadi, 2021. "Agricultural Production in Qatar’s Hot Arid Climate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-25, April.
    9. FeCheng Ma & Farhan Khan & Kashif Ullah Khan & Si XiangYun, 2021. "Investigating the Impact of Information Technology, Absorptive Capacity, and Dynamic Capabilities on Firm Performance: An Empirical Study," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, November.
    10. Michael Stuetzer & David B. Audretsch & Martin Obschonka & Samuel D. Gosling & Peter J. Rentfrow & Jeff Potter, 2018. "Entrepreneurship culture, knowledge spillovers and the growth of regions," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(5), pages 608-618, May.
    11. Skarmeas, Dionysis & Lisboa, Ana & Saridakis, Charalampos, 2016. "Export performance as a function of market learning capabilities and intrapreneurship: SEM and FsQCA findings," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 5342-5347.
    12. Fathi Alarabi Yosef & Luay Jum’a & Muntasir Alatoom, 2023. "Identifying and Categorizing Sustainable Supply Chain Practices Based on Triple Bottom Line Dimensions: Evaluation of Practice Implementation in the Cement Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-22, April.
    13. Michael MacLeod & Vera Eory & William Wint & Alexandra Shaw & Pierre J. Gerber & Giuliano Cecchi & Raffaele Mattioli & Alasdair Sykes & Timothy Robinson, 2018. "Assessing the Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Effect of Removing Bovine Trypanosomiasis in Eastern Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-15, May.
    14. Zheng, Leven J. & Fan, Youqing & Wang, Huan & Liu, Wei, 2021. "Born innovator? How founder birth order influences product innovation generation and adoption in entrepreneurial firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 414-430.
    15. Martín-Rojas, Rodrigo & Garrido-Moreno, Aurora & García-Morales, Víctor J., 2023. "Social media use, corporate entrepreneurship and organizational resilience: A recipe for SMEs success in a post-Covid scenario," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    16. Esteve Nadal-Roig & Lluís Miquel Plà-Aragonès & Víctor Manuel Albornoz, 2023. "Supply Chains: Planning the Transportation of Animals among Facilities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-14, January.
    17. Junqueira, Rogerio de Ávila Ribeiro & Morabito, Reinaldo, 2019. "Modeling and solving a sugarcane harvest front scheduling problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 150-160.
    18. Emmanouil Tziolas & Eleftherios Karapatzak & Ioannis Kalathas & Chris Lytridis & Spyridon Mamalis & Stefanos Koundouras & Theodore Pachidis & Vassilis G. Kaburlasos, 2023. "Comparative Assessment of Environmental/Energy Performance under Conventional Labor and Collaborative Robot Scenarios in Greek Viticulture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, February.
    19. Schaeffer, Michiel & Gohar, Laila & Kriegler, Elmar & Lowe, Jason & Riahi, Keywan & van Vuuren, Detlef, 2015. "Mid- and long-term climate projections for fragmented and delayed-action scenarios," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 90(PA), pages 257-268.
    20. Dost Mir & Arshad Muhammad & Afsar Bilal, 2018. "The Influence of Entrepreneurial Orientation on Types of Process Innovation Capabilities and Moderating Role of Social Capital," Entrepreneurship Research Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 8(4), pages 1-15, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:17:p:7191-:d:408171. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.