IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i16p6447-d397104.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainability of the Adjustment Schemes in China’s Grain Price Support Policy—An Empirical Analysis Based on the Partial Equilibrium Model of Wheat

Author

Listed:
  • Jingdong Li

    (Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
    Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)

  • Weidong Liu

    (Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
    Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)

  • Zhouying Song

    (Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
    Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)

Abstract

The minimum purchase price policy for wheat and rice implemented by the Chinese government has achieved the fundamental goals of stabilizing grain prices, promoting production, and ensuring food security. This policy has also had negative impacts such as domestic and foreign price spreads and continuous increases in stocks and imports, which are not conducive to China’s grain security development and thus unsustainable. Therefore, this paper builds a partial equilibrium model of China’s grain market by simulating the effects of canceling or reducing the minimum purchase price on the market price, production, consumption, stock, and net import of wheat and then evaluates the sustainability of various adjustment programs. The research results show that first, lowering the minimum purchase price of wheat can reduce the domestic and foreign price spread, stock, and imports to a certain extent; however, it cannot fundamentally solve the negative impact of this policy. Second, cancellation of the minimum wheat purchase price policy can significantly reduce domestic and foreign price spread, stock, and imports; however, it will also significantly reduce wheat production and threaten China’s grain security. Third, cancellation of the minimum wheat purchase price and the increase in agricultural production subsidies can solve the negative impact of the minimum purchase price policy and reduce the impact of the cancellation of the minimum purchase price policy on grain supply security. This policy adjustment is more sustainable than China’s current policy. Finally, this paper asserts that China’s grain price policy reform will influence and have implications for stakeholders in the global grain industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Jingdong Li & Weidong Liu & Zhouying Song, 2020. "Sustainability of the Adjustment Schemes in China’s Grain Price Support Policy—An Empirical Analysis Based on the Partial Equilibrium Model of Wheat," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-22, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:16:p:6447-:d:397104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/16/6447/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/16/6447/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hualin Xie & Bohao Wang, 2017. "An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Agricultural Product Price Fluctuations on China’s Grain Yield," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-14, May.
    2. Anderson, Kym & Strutt, Anna, 2014. "Food security policy options for China: Lessons from other countries," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(P1), pages 50-58.
    3. Marc Nerlove, 1956. "Estimates of the Elasticities of Supply of Selected Agricultural Commodities," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 38(2), pages 496-509.
    4. K.S. Aditya & S.P. Subash & K.V. Praveen & M.L. Nithyashree & N. Bhuvana & Akriti Sharma, 2017. "Awareness about Minimum Support Price and Its Impact on Diversification Decision of Farmers in India," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 4(3), pages 514-526, September.
    5. Walter C. Labys, 1975. "The Problems and Challenges for International Commodity Models and Model Builders," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 57(5), pages 873-878.
    6. Yu, Wusheng & Jensen, Hans G, 2014. "Trade policy responses to food price crisis and implications for existing domestic support measures: the case of China in 2008," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(4), pages 651-683, October.
    7. Smith, Adam, 1977. "An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations," University of Chicago Press Economics Books, University of Chicago Press, number 9780226763743 edited by Cannan, Edwin, September.
    8. Yifu Lin, Justin, 1997. "Institutional reforms and dynamics of agricultural growth in China," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 201-212, June.
    9. Westcott, Paul C. & Hoffman, Linwood A., 1999. "Price Determination for Corn and Wheat: The Role of Market Factors and Government Programs," Technical Bulletins 33581, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    10. Gallagher, Paul W., 1978. "The Effectiveness of Price Support Policy--Some Evidence for U.S. Corn Acreage Response," Staff General Research Papers Archive 12561, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    11. Gallagher, Paul W., 1978. "The Effectiveness Of Price Support Policy--Some Evidence For U.S. Corn Acreage Response," Staff Papers 14140, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    12. Lord, William & Rangazas, Peter, 1991. "Savings and Wealth in Models with Altruistic Bequests," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 81(1), pages 289-296, March.
    13. Tokgoz, Simla, 2008. "The Impact of Energy Markets on the EU Agricultural Sector," 2008 International Congress, August 26-29, 2008, Ghent, Belgium 44241, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    14. Gallagher, Paul, 1978. "The Effectiveness Of Price Support Policy-Some Evidence For U.S. Corn Acreage Response," Journal of Agricultural Economics Research, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 30(4), pages 1-7, October.
    15. von Witzke, Harald & Hausner, Ulrich, 1993. "A Public Choice Analysis Of U.S. Producer Price Support In Wheat And Corn: Implications For Agricultural Trade And Policy," Staff Papers 13475, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    16. Matthew Gorton & Carmen Hubbard & Lionel Hubbard, 2009. "The Folly of European Union Policy Transfer: Why the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Does Not Fit Central and Eastern Europe," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(10), pages 1305-1317, December.
    17. Hausman, Jerry A., 1983. "Specification and estimation of simultaneous equation models," Handbook of Econometrics, in: Z. Griliches† & M. D. Intriligator (ed.), Handbook of Econometrics, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 7, pages 391-448, Elsevier.
    18. Kim, Kwansoo & Chavas, Jean-Paul, 2002. "A Dynamic Analysis Of The Effects Of A Price Support Program On Price Dynamics And Price Volatility," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 27(2), pages 1-20, December.
    19. Quintos, Carmela E, 1995. "Sustainability of the Deficit Process with Structural Shifts," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 13(4), pages 409-417, October.
    20. Wusheng Yu & Hans G. Jensen, 2010. "China’s Agricultural Policy Transition: Impacts of Recent Reforms and Future Scenarios," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(2), pages 343-368, June.
    21. Coleman, William D. & Skogstad, Grace D. & Atkinson, Michael M., 1996. "Paradigm Shifts and Policy Networks: Cumulative Change in Agriculture," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(3), pages 273-301, September.
    22. Labys, Walter C., 1975. "The Problems and Challenges For International Commodity Models and Model Studies," 1975 Annual Meeting, August 10-13, Columbus, Ohio 284098, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    23. Chen, Xiu & Kaiser, Harry M. & Rickard, Bradley J., 2015. "The impacts of inclusive and exclusive taxes on healthy eating: An experimental study," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 13-24.
    24. Aragie, Emerta A. & Balie, Jean, 2016. "Supporting farmers and consumers under food price uncertainty: the role of price support policies," 2016 Fifth International Conference, September 23-26, 2016, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia 246387, African Association of Agricultural Economists (AAAE).
    25. Huang, Yingying & Tian, Xu, 2019. "Food accessibility, diversity of agricultural production and dietary pattern in rural China," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 92-102.
    26. Abedullah & Mubarak Ali, 2001. "Wheat Self-sufficiency in Different Policy Scenarios and Their Likely Impacts on Producers, Consumers, and the Public Exchequer," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 40(3), pages 203-223.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Min Su & Nico Heerink & Peter Oosterveer & Tao Tan & Shuyi Feng, 2021. "Impacts of China’s Minimum Grain Procurement Price Program on Agrochemical Use: A Household-Level Analysis," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-20, September.
    2. Tserenpurev Chuluunsaikhan & Ga-Ae Ryu & Kwan-Hee Yoo & HyungChul Rah & Aziz Nasridinov, 2020. "Incorporating Deep Learning and News Topic Modeling for Forecasting Pork Prices: The Case of South Korea," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-22, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Langley, James A., 1983. "Regional acreage response functions for major US field crops: estimation and policy implications," ISU General Staff Papers 198301010800008678, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    2. Jean-Paul Chavas & Matthew T. Holt, 1990. "Acreage Decisions Under Risk: The Case of Corn and Soybeans," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 72(3), pages 529-538.
    3. Bailey, Kenneth W. & Womack, Abner W., 1985. "Wheat Acreage Response: A Regional Econometric Investigation," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 17(2), pages 1-10, December.
    4. John C. Quiggin, 1983. "Underwriting Agricultural Commodity Prices," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 27(3), pages 200-211, December.
    5. Holt, Matthew T., 1989. "Risk, Rational Expectations, and Price Stabilization in the U.S. Corn Market," Staff Papers 200480, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    6. Fraser, Rob W., 1988. "A Method For Evaluating Supply Response To Price Underwriting," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 32(1), pages 1-15, April.
    7. R.W. Fraser, 1991. "Price‐Support Effects On Ec Producers," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(1), pages 1-10, January.
    8. Holt, Matthew T., 1991. "A Multi-Market Bounded Prices Model Under Rational Expectations: The Case of Corn and Soybeans in the U.S," 1991 Annual Meeting, August 4-7, Manhattan, Kansas 271199, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    9. Holt, Matthew T., 1989. "A Multi-Market Rational Expectation Model with Bounded Prices: The Case of Corn and Soybeans in the U.S," Staff Papers 200485, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    10. Denbaly, Massoud Said Mark, 1984. "U. S. monetary policy and the exchange rate: effects on the world coarse grain market," ISU General Staff Papers 198401010800008753, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    11. Liu, Hsiang-Hsi, 1983. "An annual simultaneous equation econometric model of U.S. corn and soybean cash and futures markets," ISU General Staff Papers 198301010800009935, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    12. Chavas, Jean-Paul & Holt, Matthew T., 1989. "An Analysis of Acreage Decisions Under Risk: The Case of Corn and Soybeans," Staff Papers 200476, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    13. Holt, Matthew T., 1991. "A Multi-Market Bounded Prices Model Under Rational Expectations: The Case of Corn and Soybeans," Staff Papers 200537, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    14. Peng Peng & Zhigang Xu, 2022. "Price expectations, risk aversion, and choice of sales methods for large‐scale farmers under incomplete market conditions," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38(4), pages 1012-1031, October.
    15. Bailey, Kenneth W. & Womack, Abner W., 1985. "Wheat Acreage Response: A Regional Econometric Approach," CNFAP Staff Reports 244132, Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI).
    16. Gallagher, Paul & Green, Robert C., 1984. "A Cropland Use Model: Theory And Suggestions For Estimating Planted Acreage Response," Staff Reports 277586, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    17. Salassi, Michael E., 1995. "The Responsiveness Of U.S. Rice Acreage To Price And Production Costs," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 27(2), pages 1-14, December.
    18. Min Su & Nico Heerink & Peter Oosterveer & Tao Tan & Shuyi Feng, 2021. "Impacts of China’s Minimum Grain Procurement Price Program on Agrochemical Use: A Household-Level Analysis," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-20, September.
    19. Shideed, Kamil H. & White, Fred C. & Brannen, Stephen J., 1987. "The Responsiveness Of U.S. Corn And Soybean Acreages To Conditional Price Expectations: An Application To The 1985 Farm Bill," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 19(2), pages 1-9, December.
    20. Chavas, Jean-Paul & Pope, Rulon D. & Kao, Robert S., 1983. "An Analysis Of The Role Of Futures Prices, Cash Prices And Government Programs In Acreage Response," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 8(1), pages 1-7, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:16:p:6447-:d:397104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.