IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i12p5069-d374620.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Blockchain Application for the Paris Agreement Carbon Market Mechanism—A Decision Framework and Architecture

Author

Listed:
  • Marco Schletz

    (UNEP DTU Partnership, Department of Technology, Management, and Economics, Technical University of Denmark, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark)

  • Laura A. Franke

    (Microsoft, Azure Specialist for Data, Artificial Intelligence and Blockchain, 80797 Munich, Germany)

  • Søren Salomo

    (Technology and Innovation Management, Technical University Berlin, 10623 Berlin, Germany
    DTU, Technical University of Denmark, Center for Entrepreneurship, 2400 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark)

Abstract

This paper evaluates the suitability of blockchain technology for the Article 6.2 carbon market mechanism of the Paris Agreement. The bottom-up approach of the Paris Agreement causes challenges to the robust accounting of mitigation outcomes and information asymmetry, both of which result from a high number of heterogeneous emission accounting systems. Blockchain is an innovative technology that can act as an aggregation platform for these fragmented systems while enhancing transparency and automating accounting processes. However, this new technology is not a panacea for all problems, and the trade-offs of applying blockchain technology need to be assessed case by case. We create and apply an eight-step decision framework for testing the applicability of the technology for the Paris Agreement Article 6.2 carbon market mechanism. The analysis shows that, under current mechanism specifications, a blockchain application can enhance transparency and increase automation, thereby eliminating information asymmetry. We outline a system architecture that allows the linking of the heterogeneous systems, the integration of an Article 6.2 exchange mechanism, and the progress tracking of climate targets. This blockchain architecture offers national Parties the opportunity to co-create a decentralised system in line with the bottom-up ethos of the Paris Agreement.

Suggested Citation

  • Marco Schletz & Laura A. Franke & Søren Salomo, 2020. "Blockchain Application for the Paris Agreement Carbon Market Mechanism—A Decision Framework and Architecture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-17, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:12:p:5069-:d:374620
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/12/5069/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/12/5069/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. World Bank Group, 2019. "Simulation on Connecting Climate Market Systems," World Bank Publications - Reports 32747, The World Bank Group.
    2. Peter Howson, 2019. "Tackling climate change with blockchain," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 9(9), pages 644-645, September.
    3. Mr. Dong He & Mr. Ross B Leckow & Mr. V. Haksar & Mr. Tommaso Mancini-Griffoli & Nigel Jenkinson & Ms. Mikari Kashima & Mr. Tanai Khiaonarong & Ms. Celine Rochon & Hervé Tourpe, 2017. "Fintech and Financial Services: Initial Considerations," IMF Staff Discussion Notes 2017/005, International Monetary Fund.
    4. Lambert Schneider & Stephanie La Hoz Theuer & Andrew Howard & Kelley Kizzier & Martin Cames, 2020. "Outside in? Using international carbon markets for mitigation not covered by nationally determined contributions (NDCs) under the Paris Agreement," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 18-29, January.
    5. Lin William Cong & Zhiguo He, 2019. "Blockchain Disruption and Smart Contracts," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 32(5), pages 1754-1797.
    6. Benedikt Notheisen & Jacob Benjamin Cholewa & Arun Prasad Shanmugam, 2017. "Trading Real-World Assets on Blockchain," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 59(6), pages 425-440, December.
    7. Fangyuan Zhao & Wai Kin (Victor) Chan, 2020. "When Is Blockchain Worth It? A Case Study of Carbon Trading," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-28, April.
    8. Joseph E. Aldy & William A. Pizer & Keigo Akimoto, 2017. "Comparing emissions mitigation efforts across countries," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(4), pages 501-515, May.
    9. Axel Michaelowa & Lukas Hermwille & Wolfgang Obergassel & Sonja Butzengeiger, 2019. "Additionality revisited: guarding the integrity of market mechanisms under the Paris Agreement," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(10), pages 1211-1224, November.
    10. Dong He & Ross B Leckow & Vikram Haksar & Tommaso Mancini Griffoli & Nigel Jenkinson & Mikari Kashima & Tanai Khiaonarong & Celine Rochon & Hervé Tourpe, 2017. "Fintech and Financial Services; Initial Considerations," IMF Staff Discussion Notes 17/05, International Monetary Fund.
    11. Jesse Yli-Huumo & Deokyoon Ko & Sujin Choi & Sooyong Park & Kari Smolander, 2016. "Where Is Current Research on Blockchain Technology?—A Systematic Review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(10), pages 1-27, October.
    12. Zachariadis, Markos & Hileman, Garrick & Scott, Susan V., 2019. "Governance and control in distributed ledgers: understanding the challenges facing blockchain technology in financial services," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 100479, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    13. Sylvia I. Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen & Maja Groff & Peter A. Tamás & Arthur L. Dahl & Marie Harder & Graham Hassall, 2018. "Entry into force and then? The Paris agreement and state accountability," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(5), pages 593-599, May.
    14. Oecd, 2019. "Blockchain technologies as a digital enabler for sustainable infrastructure," OECD Environment Policy Papers 16, OECD Publishing.
    15. Mehling, Michael A. & Metcalf, Gilbert E. & Stavins, Robert N., 2017. "Linking Heterogeneous Climate Policies (Consistent with the Paris Agreement)," MITP: Mitigation, Innovation and Transformation Pathways 266282, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    16. World Bank Group, "undated". "State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2019," World Bank Publications - Reports 31755, The World Bank Group.
    17. Manjana Milkoreit & Kate Haapala, 2019. "The global stocktake: design lessons for a new review and ambition mechanism in the international climate regime," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 89-106, February.
    18. Justin Macinante, 2016. "Networking Carbon Markets," World Bank Publications - Reports 25750, The World Bank Group.
    19. Lambert Schneider & Stephanie La Hoz Theuer, 2019. "Environmental integrity of international carbon market mechanisms under the Paris Agreement," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(3), pages 386-400, March.
    20. Andoni, Merlinda & Robu, Valentin & Flynn, David & Abram, Simone & Geach, Dale & Jenkins, David & McCallum, Peter & Peacock, Andrew, 2019. "Blockchain technology in the energy sector: A systematic review of challenges and opportunities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 143-174.
    21. World Bank & Ecofys, "undated". "State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2018," World Bank Publications - Reports 29687, The World Bank Group.
    22. Niklas Höhne & Takeshi Kuramochi & Carsten Warnecke & Frauke Röser & Hanna Fekete & Markus Hagemann & Thomas Day & Ritika Tewari & Marie Kurdziel & Sebastian Sterl & Sofia Gonzales, 2017. "The Paris Agreement: resolving the inconsistency between global goals and national contributions," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 16-32, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Changping Zhao & Juanjuan Sun & Yu Gong & Zhi Li & Peter Zhou, 2022. "Research on the Blue Carbon Trading Market System under Blockchain Technology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-17, April.
    2. Rahel Mandaroux & Chuanwen Dong & Guodong Li, 2021. "A European Emissions Trading System Powered by Distributed Ledger Technology: An Evaluation Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-21, February.
    3. Arsenii Vilkov & Gang Tian, 2023. "Blockchain’s Scope and Purpose in Carbon Markets: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-27, May.
    4. Campbell-Verduyn, Malcolm, 2021. "Conjuring a cooler world? Blockchains, imaginaries and the legitimacy of climate governance," Global Cooperation Research Papers 28, University of Duisburg-Essen, Käte Hamburger Kolleg / Centre for Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21).
    5. Marco Schletz & Ana Cardoso & Gabriela Prata Dias & Søren Salomo, 2020. "How Can Blockchain Technology Accelerate Energy Efficiency Interventions? A Use Case Comparison," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-23, November.
    6. Lei Su & Wenjiao Yu & Zhongxuan Zhou, 2023. "Global Trends of Carbon Finance: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-21, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marco Schletz & Ana Cardoso & Gabriela Prata Dias & Søren Salomo, 2020. "How Can Blockchain Technology Accelerate Energy Efficiency Interventions? A Use Case Comparison," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-23, November.
    2. Dorfleitner, Gregor & Muck, Franziska & Scheckenbach, Isabel, 2021. "Blockchain applications for climate protection: A global empirical investigation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    3. Croutzet, Alexandre & Dabbous, Amal, 2021. "Do FinTech trigger renewable energy use? Evidence from OECD countries," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 1608-1617.
    4. Kimani, Danson & Adams, Kweku & Attah-Boakye, Rexford & Ullah, Subhan & Frecknall-Hughes, Jane & Kim, Ja, 2020. "Blockchain, business and the fourth industrial revolution: Whence, whither, wherefore and how?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    5. N'dri, Lasme Mathieu & Kakinaka, Makoto, 2020. "Financial inclusion, mobile money, and individual welfare: The case of Burkina Faso," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(3).
    6. Ongo Nkoa, Bruno Emmanuel & Song, Jacques Simon, 2020. "Does institutional quality affect financial inclusion in Africa? A panel data analysis," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 44(4).
    7. Ari, Izzet & Yikmaz, Riza Fikret, 2019. "The role of renewable energy in achieving Turkey's INDC," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 244-251.
    8. Agur, Itai & Ari, Anil & Dell’Ariccia, Giovanni, 2022. "Designing central bank digital currencies," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 62-79.
    9. Gajendra Liyanaarachchi & Giampaolo Viglia & Fidan Kurtaliqi, 2024. "Addressing challenges of digital transformation with modified blockchain," Post-Print hal-04440365, HAL.
    10. Uddin, Md Hamid & Mollah, Sabur & Islam, Nazrul & Ali, Md Hakim, 2023. "Does digital transformation matter for operational risk exposure?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    11. Julia Bersch & Jean François Clevy & Naseem Muhammad & Mrs. Esther Perez Ruiz & Mr. Yorbol Yakhshilikov, 2021. "Fintech Potential for Remittance Transfers: A Central America Perspective," IMF Working Papers 2021/175, International Monetary Fund.
    12. Anna Borkovcová & Miloslava Černá & Marcela Sokolová, 2022. "Blockchain in the Energy Sector—Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-12, November.
    13. Xiwen Fu & Shuxin Wang, 2022. "How to Promote Low-Carbon Cities with Blockchain Technology? A Blockchain-Based Low-Carbon Development Model for Chinese Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-17, October.
    14. Fred Huibers, 2021. "Regulatory Response to the Rise of Fintech Credit in The Netherlands," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-12, August.
    15. Guo, Qiaozhen & He, Qiao-Chu & Chen, Ying-Ju & Huang, Wei, 2021. "Poverty mitigation via solar panel adoption: Smart contracts and targeted subsidy design," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    16. Sun, Yi & Jiang, Shiqing & Jia, Wanjiao & Wang, Yu, 2022. "Blockchain as a cutting-edge technology impacting business: A systematic literature review perspective," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(10).
    17. Ye, Wang & Wong, Wing-Keung & Arnone, Gioia & Nassani, Abdelmohsen A. & Haffar, Mohamed & Faiz, Muhammad Fauzinudin, 2023. "Crypto currency and green investment impact on global environment: A time series analysis," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 155-169.
    18. Friedman, Nicola & Ormiston, Jarrod, 2022. "Blockchain as a sustainability-oriented innovation?: Opportunities for and resistance to Blockchain technology as a driver of sustainability in global food supply chains," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    19. Weichu Deng & Teng Huang & Haiyang Wang, 2022. "A Review of the Key Technology in a Blockchain Building Decentralized Trust Platform," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-29, December.
    20. Ms. Inutu Lukonga, 2018. "Fintech, Inclusive Growth and Cyber Risks: Focus on the MENAP and CCA Regions," IMF Working Papers 2018/201, International Monetary Fund.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:12:p:5069-:d:374620. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.