IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2019i1p265-d302921.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inside or Outside? The Impact Factors of Zoning–Land Use Mismatch

Author

Listed:
  • Guan Li

    (Law School, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China
    Land Academy for National Development, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310029, China)

  • Zhongguo Xu

    (Land Academy for National Development, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310029, China
    Research Department of Land Science and Real Estate, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310029, China)

  • Cifang Wu

    (Land Academy for National Development, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310029, China)

  • Yuefei Zhuo

    (Research Department of Land Science and Real Estate, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310029, China)

  • Xinhua Tong

    (School of Geography and Planning, Guangxi Teachers Education University, Nanning 530001, China)

  • Yanfei Wei

    (School of Land Resources and Surveying, Guangxi Teachers Education University, Nanning 530001, China)

  • Xiaoqiang Shen

    (School of Management, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China)

Abstract

A land-use plan is a core policy tool to curb excessive non-agriculturalization of agricultural land. The effect of plan implementation can affect sustainable land use and regional development. Empirical studies have shown that land development commonly and frequently fails to conform to land-use plans. However, neither qualitative nor quantitative studies are conducted to comprehensively explore the reasons for zoning–land use mismatch. To help bridge this gap, this study explored to what extent a plan has been implemented and what factors have affected zoning–land use mismatch. A new deviation discriminant framework of planning implementation was presented. Moreover, the logistics model was applied to discuss which factors substantially affect the zoning–land use mismatch. The plan implementation results were divided into the conformed, exceeded and unused areas. The general land-use plan failed in its spatial control over rural settlements and other built-up lands, with both more than 90% of the newly added construction land beyond zoning. In addition, the newly added construction land of rural settlements, other built-up lands, and transportation lands all exceeded the quota control. Furthermore, the physical factors of distance from the river, the elevation, the slope and the level, and the social-economic factors of the gross domestic product, the fiscal revenue, the fixed assets investments, and the rank of town have prominent effects on zoning–land use mismatch. Enhancing the flexibility of the land-use plan and strengthening the relationship between planning quotas and spatial zoning in the future are necessary to promote the effect of plan implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Guan Li & Zhongguo Xu & Cifang Wu & Yuefei Zhuo & Xinhua Tong & Yanfei Wei & Xiaoqiang Shen, 2019. "Inside or Outside? The Impact Factors of Zoning–Land Use Mismatch," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-25, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2019:i:1:p:265-:d:302921
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/1/265/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/1/265/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ward Lyles & Philip Berke & Gavin Smith, 2016. "Local plan implementation: assessing conformance and influence of local plans in the United States," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 43(2), pages 381-400, March.
    2. Deng, Xiangzheng & Huang, Jikun & Rozelle, Scott & Uchida, Emi, 2008. "Growth, population and industrialization, and urban land expansion of China," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 96-115, January.
    3. Tan, Rong & Qu, Futian & Heerink, Nico & Mettepenningen, Evy, 2011. "Rural to urban land conversion in China — How large is the over-conversion and what are its welfare implications?," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 474-484.
    4. Sha Chen & Guan Li & Zhongguo Xu & Yuefei Zhuo & Cifang Wu & Yanmei Ye, 2019. "Combined Impact of Socioeconomic Forces and Policy Implications: Spatial-Temporal Dynamics of the Ecosystem Services Value in Yangtze River Delta, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-22, May.
    5. Lucie Laurian & Maxine Day & Michael Backhurst & Philip Berke & Neil Ericksen & Jan Crawford & Jenny Dixon & Sarah Chapman, 2004. "What drives plan implementation? Plans, planning agencies and developers," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(4), pages 555-577.
    6. Li, Hongbin & Zhou, Li-An, 2005. "Political turnover and economic performance: the incentive role of personnel control in China," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(9-10), pages 1743-1762, September.
    7. Samuel D Brody & Wesley E Highfield & Sara Thornton, 2006. "Planning at the Urban Fringe: An Examination of the Factors Influencing Nonconforming Development Patterns in Southern Florida," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 33(1), pages 75-96, February.
    8. R Pendall, 1999. "Do Land-Use Controls Cause Sprawl?," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 26(4), pages 555-571, August.
    9. Shen, Xiaoqiang & Wang, Xiangdong & Zhang, Zhou & Lu, Zhangwei & Lv, Tiangui, 2019. "Evaluating the effectiveness of land use plans in containing urban expansion: An integrated view," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 205-213.
    10. Jan K. Brueckner, 2000. "Urban Sprawl: Diagnosis and Remedies," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 23(2), pages 160-171, April.
    11. Lichtenberg, Erik & Ding, Chengri, 2009. "Local officials as land developers: Urban spatial expansion in China," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 57-64, July.
    12. H W Calkins, 1979. "The Planning Monitor: An Accountability Theory of Plan Evaluation," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 11(7), pages 745-758, July.
    13. Yong Liu & Wenze Yue & Peilei Fan & Yi Peng & Zhengtao Zhang, 2016. "Financing China's Suburbanization: Capital Accumulation through Suburban Land Development in Hangzhou," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(6), pages 1112-1133, November.
    14. Xiaofei Wei & Chaofu Wei & Xiaoteng Cao & Bing Li, 2016. "The general land-use planning in China: an uncertainty perspective," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 43(2), pages 361-380, March.
    15. Carolyn Loh, 2011. "Assessing and Interpreting Non-conformance in Land-use Planning Implementation," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(3), pages 271-287.
    16. E R Alexander & A Faludi, 1989. "Planning and Plan Implementation: Notes on Evaluation Criteria," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 16(2), pages 127-140, June.
    17. E Talen, 1997. "Success, Failure, and Conformance: An Alternative Approach to Planning Evaluation," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 24(4), pages 573-587, August.
    18. Yanjing Zhang & Zhengguo Su & Guan Li & Yuefei Zhuo & Zhongguo Xu, 2018. "Spatial-Temporal Evolution of Sustainable Urbanization Development: A Perspective of the Coupling Coordination Development Based on Population, Industry, and Built-Up Land Spatial Agglomeration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-20, May.
    19. Qiuhao Huang & Yongxue Liu & Manchun Li & Kun Mao & Feixue Li & Zhenjie Chen & Chong Chen & Wei Hu, 2012. "Thematic maps for county-level land use planning in Contemporary China," Journal of Maps, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(2), pages 185-188.
    20. H Mastop, 1997. "Performance in Dutch Spatial Planning: An Introduction," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 24(6), pages 807-813, December.
    21. Timothy S Chapin & Robert E Deyle & Earl J Baker, 2008. "A Parcel-Based GIS Method for Evaluating Conformance of Local Land-Use Planning with a State Mandate to Reduce Exposure to Hurricane Flooding," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 35(2), pages 261-279, April.
    22. Rong Tan & Volker Beckmann, 2010. "Diversity of Practical Quota Systems for Farmland Preservation: A Multicountry Comparison and Analysis," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 28(2), pages 211-224, April.
    23. Fulong Wu & Anthony Gar-On Yeh, 1997. "Changing Spatial Distribution and Determinants of Land Development in Chinese Cities in the Transition from a Centrally Planned Economy to a Socialist Market Economy: A Case Study of Guangzhou," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 34(11), pages 1851-1879, November.
    24. H Mastop & A Faludi, 1997. "Evaluation of Strategic Plans: The Performance Principle," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 24(6), pages 815-832, December.
    25. Yizhou Wu & Peilei Fan & Bo Li & Zutao Ouyang & Yong Liu & Heyuan You, 2017. "The Effectiveness of Planning Control on Urban Growth: Evidence from Hangzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-24, May.
    26. Philip Berke & Michael Backhurst & Maxine Day & Neil Ericksen & Lucie Laurian & Jan Crawford & Jennifer Dixon, 2006. "What Makes Plan Implementation Successful? An Evaluation of Local Plans and Implementation Practices in New Zealand," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 33(4), pages 581-600, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Jian & Wu, Qun & Yan, Siqi & Guo, Guancheng & Peng, Shangui, 2020. "China’s local governments breaking the land use planning quota: A strategic interaction perspective," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    2. Guan Li & Liping Wang & Cifang Wu & Zhongguo Xu & Yuefei Zhuo & Xiaoqiang Shen, 2022. "Spatial Planning Implementation Effectiveness: Review and Research Prospects," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-20, August.
    3. Li Fang & Chuanhao Tian & Xiaohong Yin & Yan Song, 2018. "Political Cycles and the Mix of Industrial and Residential Land Leasing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-24, August.
    4. Zhao, Qianyu & Zhang, Zhanlu, 2017. "Does China’s ‘increasing versus decreasing balance’ land-restructuring policy restructure rural life? Evidence from Dongfan Village, Shaanxi Province," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 649-659.
    5. Han, Li & Kung, James Kai-Sing, 2015. "Fiscal incentives and policy choices of local governments: Evidence from China," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 89-104.
    6. Li, Lixing, 2011. "The incentive role of creating "cities" in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 172-181, March.
    7. Yanjing Zhang & Zhengguo Su & Guan Li & Yuefei Zhuo & Zhongguo Xu, 2018. "Spatial-Temporal Evolution of Sustainable Urbanization Development: A Perspective of the Coupling Coordination Development Based on Population, Industry, and Built-Up Land Spatial Agglomeration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-20, May.
    8. Zhi Wang & Qinghua Zhang & Li-An Zhou, 2020. "Career Incentives of City Leaders and Urban Spatial Expansion in China," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 102(5), pages 897-911, December.
    9. Jianwei Li & Guo'ao Li & Jingang Li & Aoran Liu, 2022. "Integrating conformance and performance for the evaluation of urban planning implementation from a goal-oriented perspective," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(2), pages 737-753, February.
    10. Sidong Zhao & Xingping Wang & Xuefeng Hu & Dongxue Li, 2020. "Evaluation Research on Planning Implementation of Chinese Overseas Economic and Trade Cooperation Zones along the Belt and Road: Evidence from Longjiang Industrial Park, Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-22, October.
    11. Qiyan Wu & Jianquan Cheng, 2019. "A temporally cyclic growth model of urban spatial morphology in China: Evidence from Kunming Metropolis," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(8), pages 1533-1553, June.
    12. Feng, Juan & Lichtenberg, Erik & Ding, Chengri, 2015. "Balancing act: Economic incentives, administrative restrictions, and urban land expansion in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 184-197.
    13. Youjung Kim & Galen Newman, 2019. "Climate Change Preparedness: Comparing Future Urban Growth and Flood Risk in Amsterdam and Houston," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-24, February.
    14. Ortuño-Padilla, Armando & Fernández-Aracil, Patricia, 2013. "Impact of fuel price on the development of the urban sprawl in Spain," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 180-187.
    15. Tang, Peng & Feng, Yue & Li, Min & Zhang, Yanyan, 2021. "Can the performance evaluation change from central government suppress illegal land use in local governments? A new interpretation of Chinese decentralisation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    16. Xuanyi Nie, 2023. "The ‘medical city’ and China’s entrepreneurial state: Spatial production under rising consumerism in healthcare," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(6), pages 1102-1122, May.
    17. Wang, Yuan & Hui, Eddie Chi-man, 2017. "Are local governments maximizing land revenue? Evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 196-215.
    18. Jipeng Zhang & Jianyong Fan & Jiawei Mo, 2017. "Government Intervention, Land Market, And Urban Development: Evidence From Chinese Cities," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 55(1), pages 115-136, January.
    19. Li, Shi & Vendryes, Thomas, 2018. "Real estate activity, democracy and land rights in rural China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 54-79.
    20. De Tong & Jun Chu & Qing Han & Xuan Liu, 2022. "How Land Finance Drives Urban Expansion under Fiscal Pressure: Evidence from Chinese Cities," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-15, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2019:i:1:p:265-:d:302921. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.