IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i9p2476-d226399.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Junior Secondary School Students’ Conceptions of and Approaches to Learning Mathematics and Their Relationships in Mainland China

Author

Listed:
  • Xinrong Yang

    (School of Mathematics and Statistics, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China)

  • Frederick Leung

    (School of Mathematics and Statistics, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
    Faculty of Education, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China)

  • Shasha Zhang

    (School of Mathematics and Statistics, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China)

Abstract

This study reports the findings of a study which investigated junior secondary school students’ conceptions of and approaches to learning mathematics and their relationships in Mainland China. Two questionnaires, conceptions of learning mathematics (COLM) and approaches to learning mathematics (ALM), were administered to 1590 students. Descriptive analysis results suggest that Chinese junior school students tend to hold (1) higher-level conceptions of learning mathematics rather than lower-level conceptions, and (2) deep approaches to learning mathematics with a rather mixed surface and deep motive in learning mathematics. Correlation and regression analysis results confirm a structural relationship between students’ conceptions of and approaches to learning in the subject of mathematics. Two factors of students’ lower-level conceptions of learning mathematics, “memorizing” and “testing”, were the strongest predictor for the surface approaches to mathematics learning, while students’ higher-level conceptions of learning mathematics, such as “applying” and “understanding and mathematical thinking”, had a noticeable effect on their deep approaches to learning mathematics. However, under the pressure of examination in Mainland China, “understanding and mathematical thinking” was also found to exert quite a strong influence on students’ “surface motive”.

Suggested Citation

  • Xinrong Yang & Frederick Leung & Shasha Zhang, 2019. "Junior Secondary School Students’ Conceptions of and Approaches to Learning Mathematics and Their Relationships in Mainland China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-13, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:9:p:2476-:d:226399
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/9/2476/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/9/2476/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephen Sterling & Ian Thomas, 2006. "Education for sustainability: the role of capabilities in guiding university curricula," International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(4), pages 349-370.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kaarina Määttä & Sanna Hyvärinen & Tanja Äärelä & Satu Uusiautti, 2020. "Five Basic Cornerstones of Sustainability Education in the Arctic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-15, February.
    2. María Majadas Matesanz & Sandra Sofia Ferreira da Silva Caeiro & Paula Bacelar Nicolau, 2023. "Anticipating Future Needs in Key Competences for Sustainability in Two Distance Learning Universities of Spain and Portugal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-20, March.
    3. Enrique Carmona-Medeiro & José María Cardeñoso Domingo, 2021. "Social Interaction: A Crucial Means to Promote Sustainability in Initial Teacher Training," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-24, August.
    4. Faham, Elham & Rezvanfar, Ahmad & Movahed Mohammadi, Seyed Hamid & Rajabi Nohooji, Meisam, 2017. "Using system dynamics to develop education for sustainable development in higher education with the emphasis on the sustainability competencies of students," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 307-326.
    5. Lavrysh Yuliana, 2017. "Transformations in Ukrainian Culture of Learning," Journal of Intercultural Management, Sciendo, vol. 9(4), pages 97-112, December.
    6. Guia Bianchi, 2020. "Sustainability competences: A systematic literature review," JRC Research Reports JRC123624, Joint Research Centre.
    7. Philip Hallinger & Chatchai Chatpinyakoop, 2019. "A Bibliometric Review of Research on Higher Education for Sustainable Development, 1998–2018," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-20, April.
    8. Mohsin Abdur Rehman & Muhammad Kashif & Michela Mingione, 2019. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability (CSRS) Initiatives among European and Asian Business Schools: A Web-based Content Analysis," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 20(5), pages 1231-1247, October.
    9. Katja Brundiers & Arnim Wiek, 2013. "Do We Teach What We Preach? An International Comparison of Problem- and Project-Based Learning Courses in Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-22, April.
    10. Rosa María Brito & Columba Rodríguez & José Luis Aparicio & Jerome Paolacci & María Laura Sampedro & Juana Beltrán, 2018. "Indicators of Sustainability in Educational Practice: Perception of Teachers and Students of UAGro-Mexico," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-18, October.
    11. Leire Guerenabarrena-Cortazar & Jon Olaskoaga-Larrauri & Ernesto Cilleruelo-Carrasco, 2021. "Integration of Sustainability in Engineering and Architectural Studies in Spanish Universities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-14, July.
    12. Norka Blanco-Portela & Luis R-Pertierra & Javier Benayas & Rodrigo Lozano, 2018. "Sustainability Leaders’ Perceptions on the Drivers for and the Barriers to the Integration of Sustainability in Latin American Higher Education Institutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, August.
    13. Jin Su Jeong & David González-Gómez & Florentina Cañada-Cañada, 2019. "Prioritizing Elements of Science Education for Sustainable Development with the MCDA-FDEMATEL Method Using the Flipped E-Learning Scheme," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-14, May.
    14. Wyness, Lynne & Dalton, Fiona, 2018. "The value of problem-based learning in learning for sustainability: Undergraduate accounting student perspectives," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 1-19.
    15. M. Isabel Sánchez-Hernández & Juan José Maldonado-Briegas, 2019. "Sustainable Entrepreneurial Culture Programs Promoting Social Responsibility: A European Regional Experience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-19, July.
    16. Katrin Muff & Anna Liechti & Thomas Dyllick, 2020. "How to apply responsible leadership theory in practice: A competency tool to collaborate on the sustainable development goals," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5), pages 2254-2274, September.
    17. César Tapia-Fonllem & Blanca Fraijo-Sing & Víctor Corral-Verdugo & Anais Ortiz Valdez, 2017. "Education for Sustainable Development in Higher Education Institutions," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(1), pages 21582440166, January.
    18. Douglas Bourn & Nese Soysal, 2021. "Transformative Learning and Pedagogical Approaches in Education for Sustainable Development: Are Initial Teacher Education Programmes in England and Turkey Ready for Creating Agents of Change for Sust," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.
    19. Sandra Wilhelm & Ruth Förster & Anne B. Zimmermann, 2019. "Implementing Competence Orientation: Towards Constructively Aligned Education for Sustainable Development in University-Level Teaching-And-Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-22, March.
    20. Sarah Holdsworth & Ian Thomas & Orana Sandri, 2018. "Assessing Graduate Sustainability Attributes Using a Vignette/Scenario Approach," Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, , vol. 12(2), pages 120-139, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:9:p:2476-:d:226399. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.