IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i3p708-d201765.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Fairness Concerns on the Formation of Retailers Alliance with Consideration of Transshipment

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaohong Yu

    (School of Economics and Management, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China)

  • Sujuan Wang

    (School of Economics and Management, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China)

  • Xindong Zhang

    (School of Economics and Management, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China)

Abstract

This paper investigated the impact of fairness concerns on the formation of the inventory transshipment strategy alliance through its impact on the ordering decisions and profits of two retailers. The paper introduced reference point dependency to describe the retailer’s fairness concerns utility function, and modeled the strategic alliance system consisting of two retailers involved in transshipment. The conditions for the existence of Nash equilibrium solutions were given. The paper solved the impact of the fairness parameters on order quantities and profits by the implicit function theorem. Based on the theoretical analysis and numerical examples, this paper investigated the formation of a strategic alliance under asymmetric and symmetric fairness concerns. The results are as follows: (1) under asymmetric fairness concerns, when the transshipment price of the retailer with no fairness concerns is no more than the transshipment price of the retailer with fairness concerns, an inventory transshipment strategy alliance can be formed. Otherwise the retailer with no fairness concerns may need to pay the retailer with fairness concerns certain fees in order to form a strategic alliance; (2) under symmetric fairness concerns, two completely symmetric retailers can form strategic alliances.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaohong Yu & Sujuan Wang & Xindong Zhang, 2019. "The Impact of Fairness Concerns on the Formation of Retailers Alliance with Consideration of Transshipment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-19, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:3:p:708-:d:201765
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/3/708/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/3/708/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lawrence W. Robinson, 1990. "Optimal and Approximate Policies in Multiperiod, Multilocation Inventory Models with Transshipments," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 38(2), pages 278-295, April.
    2. Hossein Abouee-Mehrizi & Oded Berman & Shrutivandana Sharma, 2015. "Optimal Joint Replenishment and Transshipment Policies in a Multi-Period Inventory System with Lost Sales," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(2), pages 342-350, April.
    3. Jing Shao & Harish Krishnan & S. Thomas McCormick, 2011. "Incentives for Transshipment in a Supply Chain with Decentralized Retailers," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 361-372, July.
    4. Ulrich Wassmer & Sali Li & Anoop Madhok, 2017. "Resource ambidexterity through alliance portfolios and firm performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(2), pages 384-394, February.
    5. Yan, Xinghao & Zhao, Hui, 2015. "Inventory sharing and coordination among n independent retailers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(2), pages 576-587.
    6. Brenda Bos & Dries Faems & Florian Noseleit, 2017. "Alliance Concentration in Multinational Companies: Examining Alliance Portfolios, Firm Structure, and Firm Performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(11), pages 2298-2309, November.
    7. Jeffrey J. Reuer & Nandini Lahiri, 2014. "Searching for Alliance Partners: Effects of Geographic Distance on the Formation of R&D Collaborations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 283-298, February.
    8. Nils Rudi & Sandeep Kapur & David F. Pyke, 2001. "A Two-Location Inventory Model with Transshipment and Local Decision Making," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(12), pages 1668-1680, December.
    9. Ernst Fehr & Klaus M. Schmidt, 1999. "A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 114(3), pages 817-868.
    10. Uday S. Karmarkar, 1987. "The Multilocation Multiperiod Inventory Problem: Bounds and Approximations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 86-94, January.
    11. Samuel Aryee & Fred O. Walumbwa & Reuben Mondejar & Chris W. L. Chu, 2015. "Accounting for the Influence of Overall Justice on Job Performance: Integrating Self-Determination and Social Exchange Theories," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(2), pages 231-252, March.
    12. Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky, 2013. "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Leonard C MacLean & William T Ziemba (ed.), HANDBOOK OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF FINANCIAL DECISION MAKING Part I, chapter 6, pages 99-127, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    13. Africa Ariño & Peter Smith Ring, 2010. "The role of fairness in alliance formation," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(10), pages 1054-1087, October.
    14. Rong Li & Jennifer K. Ryan & Zhi Zeng, 2017. "Coordination in a Single-Supplier, Multi-Retailer Distribution System: Supplier-Facilitated Transshipments," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 26(5), pages 784-801, May.
    15. Han Jiang & Jun Xia & Albert A. Cannella & Ting Xiao, 2018. "Do ongoing networks block out new friends? Reconciling the embeddedness constraint dilemma on new alliance partner addition," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(1), pages 217-241, January.
    16. Tony Haitao Cui & Jagmohan S. Raju & Z. John Zhang, 2007. "Fairness and Channel Coordination," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(8), pages 1303-1314, August.
    17. Lingxiu Dong & Nils Rudi, 2004. "Who Benefits from Transshipment? Exogenous vs. Endogenous Wholesale Prices," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(5), pages 645-657, May.
    18. Dane P. Blevins & Roberto Ragozzino, 2018. "An examination of the effects of venture capitalists on the alliance formation activity of entrepreneurial firms," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(7), pages 2075-2091, July.
    19. Ulrich Wassmer & Sali Li & Anoop Madhok, 2017. "Resource ambidexterity through alliance portfolios and firm performance," Post-Print hal-02313356, HAL.
    20. Slikker, Marco & Fransoo, Jan & Wouters, Marc, 2005. "Cooperation between multiple news-vendors with transshipments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(2), pages 370-380, December.
    21. Teck-Hua Ho & Juanjuan Zhang, 2008. "Designing Pricing Contracts for Boundedly Rational Customers: Does the Framing of the Fixed Fee Matter?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(4), pages 686-700, April.
    22. Nie, Tengfei & Du, Shaofu, 2017. "Dual-fairness supply chain with quantity discount contracts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(2), pages 491-500.
    23. Kevin Glazebrook & Colin Paterson & Sandra Rauscher & Thomas Archibald, 2015. "Benefits of Hybrid Lateral Transshipments in Multi-Item Inventory Systems under Periodic Replenishment," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 24(2), pages 311-324, February.
    24. Fuguo Zhao & Desheng Wu & Liang Liang & Alexandre Dolgui, 2016. "Lateral inventory transshipment problem in online-to-offline supply chain," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(7), pages 1951-1963, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaohong Yu & Sujuan Wang & Xindong Zhang, 2019. "Ordering Decision and Coordination of a Dual-Channel Supply Chain with Fairness Concerns Under an Online-to-Offline Model," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 36(02), pages 1-26, April.
    2. Andrew M. Davis & Rihuan Huang & Douglas J. Thomas, 2022. "Retailer Inventory Sharing in Two-Tier Supply Chains: An Experimental Investigation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(12), pages 8773-8790, December.
    3. Ping Zhang & Hong Yan & King Wah Pang, 2019. "Inventory Sharing Strategy for Disposable Medical Items between Two Hospitals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-21, November.
    4. Ji, Xiang & Sun, Jiasen & Wang, Zebin, 2017. "Turn bad into good: Using transshipment-before-buyback for disruptions of stochastic demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 150-161.
    5. Yadong Shu & Ying Dai & Zujun Ma, 2019. "Pricing Decisions in Closed-Loop Supply Chains with Peer-Induced Fairness Concerns," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-19, September.
    6. Elena Katok & Diana Yan Wu, 2009. "Contracting in Supply Chains: A Laboratory Investigation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(12), pages 1953-1968, December.
    7. Chun-Hung Chiu & Gang Hao & Xin Dai & Hang Xie, 2020. "Inventory sharing of professional optics product supply chain with equal power agents," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 291(1), pages 169-194, August.
    8. Rong Li, 2020. "Reinvent Retail Supply Chain: Ship‐from‐Store‐to‐Store," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(8), pages 1825-1836, August.
    9. Stienstra, Miranda, 2020. "The determinants and performance implications of alliance partner acquisition," Other publications TiSEM 7fdee0c2-d4d2-4f5b-95e3-2, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    10. Özdemir, Deniz & Yücesan, Enver & Herer, Yale T., 2013. "Multi-location transshipment problem with capacitated production," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 226(3), pages 425-435.
    11. Paterson, Colin & Kiesmüller, Gudrun & Teunter, Ruud & Glazebrook, Kevin, 2011. "Inventory models with lateral transshipments: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 210(2), pages 125-136, April.
    12. Silbermayr, Lena, 2020. "A review of non-cooperative newsvendor games with horizontal inventory interactions," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    13. Suresh P. Sethi & Sushil Gupta & Vipin K. Agrawal & Vijay K. Agrawal, 2022. "Nobel laureates’ contributions to and impacts on operations management," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(12), pages 4283-4303, December.
    14. Đula, Ivan & Größler, Andreas, 2021. "Inequity aversion in dynamically complex supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(1), pages 309-322.
    15. Silbermayr, Lena & Gerchak, Yigal, 2019. "Partial pooling by independent firms with allocation according to contribution to pool," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 375-385.
    16. Cheng, Lihong & Guo, Xiaolong & Li, Xiaoxiao & Yu, Yugang, 2022. "Data-driven ordering and transshipment decisions for online retailers and logistics service providers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    17. Shan Li & Kay‐Yut Chen, 2020. "The Commitment Conundrum of Inventory Sharing," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(2), pages 353-370, February.
    18. He, Yong & Zhang, Peng & Yao, Yuliang, 2014. "Unidirectional transshipment policies in a dual-channel supply chain," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 259-268.
    19. Xin Fang & Soo-Haeng Cho, 2014. "Stability and Endogenous Formation of Inventory Transshipment Networks," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(6), pages 1316-1334, December.
    20. Linghong Zhang & Bowen Xue & Xiyu Liu, 2018. "Carbon Emission Reduction with Regard to Retailer’s Fairness Concern and Subsidies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-28, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:3:p:708-:d:201765. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.