IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i23p6722-d291465.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Characterizing Stakeholders of Aging-in-Place through Social Network Analysis: A Study of Nanjing, China

Author

Listed:
  • Shenghua Zhou

    (Department of Civil Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR 999077, China)

  • S. Thomas Ng

    (Department of Civil Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR 999077, China)

  • Dezhi Li

    (Department of Construction and Real Estate, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China
    The People’s Livelihood Research Center, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China)

  • Jiankun Zhang

    (Department of Construction and Real Estate, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China
    The People’s Livelihood Research Center, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China)

  • Jie Fan

    (Department of Construction and Real Estate, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China
    The People’s Livelihood Research Center, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China)

  • Yifan Yang

    (Department of Civil Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR 999077, China)

Abstract

China currently has an elderly population of 249 million with over 97% of them ending up aging in place. Although various regional pilot programs have been conducted, a sustainable aging-in-place system has not been established to effectively and efficiently provide aging services in many cities of China. The characteristics of stakeholder networks in the aging-in-place systems have not attracted great attention from researchers. This research applies social network analysis to characterize the interactions of stakeholders in aging-in-place systems to facilitate cooperation and coordination amongst them. Using Nanjing as a case study, 23 stakeholders in Nanjing’s aging-in-place system are identified, such as the Aging Affairs Committee, Aging-in-Place Service Association, and aging-in-place service centers; and then the relationship networks of these stakeholders in terms of communication, supervision, and trust are developed and analyzed. The results show that the aging-in-place system suffers from certain defects, including the loose connection of government departments, redundant information channels, low trustworthiness of certain aging-in-place service centers, poor credibility of third-party training and assessment institutions, and excess power of the industry association. To tackle these issues, a wide spectrum of actionable measures applicable to Nanjing’s conditions, as well as high-level policy implications for other cities of China, are proposed for augmenting the communication, supervision, and trust among stakeholder groups.

Suggested Citation

  • Shenghua Zhou & S. Thomas Ng & Dezhi Li & Jiankun Zhang & Jie Fan & Yifan Yang, 2019. "Characterizing Stakeholders of Aging-in-Place through Social Network Analysis: A Study of Nanjing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-19, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:23:p:6722-:d:291465
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/23/6722/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/23/6722/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cheng, Yang & Rosenberg, Mark W. & Wang, Wuyi & Yang, Linsheng & Li, Hairong, 2011. "Aging, health and place in residential care facilities in Beijing, China," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(3), pages 365-372, February.
    2. Yang Cheng, Siyao Gao, Shuai Li, Yuchao Zhang and Mark Rosenberg, 2019. "Understanding the spatial disparities and vulnerability of population aging in China," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies 201905, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
    3. Yang Cheng & Siyao Gao & Shuai Li & Yuchao Zhang & Mark Rosenberg, 2019. "Understanding the spatial disparities and vulnerability of population aging in China," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 6(1), pages 73-89, January.
    4. Geyskens, I. & Steenkamp, J.E.B.M. & Scheer, L.K. & Kumar, N., 1996. "The effects of trust and interdependence on relationship commitment : A trans-Atlantic study," Other publications TiSEM ef7c8d6c-963d-4ee7-8576-9, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    5. Siti Nuryanah & Sardar M. N. Islam, 2015. "The Context of the Case Study," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Corporate Governance and Financial Management, chapter 5, pages 145-156, Palgrave Macmillan.
    6. Liang Wang & Justin Tan, 2019. "Social Structure of Regional Entrepreneurship: The Impacts of Collective Action of Incumbents on De Novo Entrants," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 43(5), pages 855-879, September.
    7. Chaffin, B.C. & Garmestani, A.S. & Gosnell, H. & Craig, R.K., 2016. "Institutional networks and adaptive water governance in the Klamath River Basin, USA," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 112-121.
    8. Xiaocang Xu & Linhong Chen, 2019. "Projection of Long-Term Care Costs in China, 2020–2050: Based on the Bayesian Quantile Regression Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-13, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhenjiang Song & Baoshu Wu & Yue Huang & Shubin Zhu & Lan Gao & Yi Li, 2022. "Effects of Household Resource Utilization Behaviors on Giant Panda Habitat under the Background of Aging: Evidence from Sichuan Province," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-18, November.
    2. Liping Fu & Yuhui Wang & Lanping He, 2020. "Factors Associated with the Psychological Health of Caregiving Older Parents and Support from Their Grown Children: Results from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-11, January.
    3. Changyong Yang & Jianyuan Huang & Jiahao Yu, 2023. "Inequalities in Resource Distribution and Healthcare Service Utilization of Long-Term Care in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-17, February.
    4. Hao Zhu, 2022. "Spatial Matching and Policy-Planning Evaluation of Urban Elderly Care Facilities Based on Multi-Agent Simulation: Evidence from Shanghai, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-20, December.
    5. Chengmin Zhou & Ting Huang & Xin Luo & Jake Kaner & Xiaoman Fu, 2022. "Recognition and Analysis of an Age-Friendly Intelligent Sofa Design Based on Skeletal Key-Points," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-21, September.
    6. Xiaoran Huang & Pixin Gong & Marcus White, 2022. "Study on Spatial Distribution Equilibrium of Elderly Care Facilities in Downtown Shanghai," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-17, June.
    7. Yonghe Xiao & Jingxuan Li, 2022. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: A conversational analysis of aging in China from a cross-section of the labour market: a corpus-based study," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-7, December.
    8. Jiajing Li & Yanran Huang & Stephen Nicholas & Jian Wang, 2019. "China’s New Cooperative Medical Scheme’s Impact on the Medical Expenses of Elderly Rural Migrants," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-11, December.
    9. Yuanyuan Wu & Yuxiang Song & Tingting Yu, 2019. "Spatial Differences in China’s Population Aging and Influencing Factors: The Perspectives of Spatial Dependence and Spatial Heterogeneity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-20, October.
    10. Shuo Ding, 2023. "Vulnerability to Poverty in Chinese Households with Elderly Members: 2013–2018," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-30, March.
    11. Shan Lu & Yupan Wu & Zongfu Mao & Xiaohui Liang, 2020. "Association of Formal and Informal Social Support With Health-Related Quality of Life Among Chinese Rural Elders," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-14, February.
    12. Andrea Čajková & Peter Čajka, 2021. "Challenges and Sustainability of China’s Socio-Economic Stability in the Context of Its Demographic Development," Societies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, March.
    13. Sawssen Khlifi & Ghazi Zouari, 2021. "The Impact of CEO Overconfidence on Real Earnings Management: Evidence from M&A Transactions," Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 20(3), pages 402-424, September.
    14. Boqin Xie & Chenjuan Ma & Junqiao Wang, 2020. "Independent and Combined Relationships of Perceived Neighborhood Social Cohesion and Physical Frailty on Functional Disability in Community-Dwelling Older Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-12, August.
    15. Ahmed Ibrahim Alzahrani & T. Ramayah & Nalini Suppiah & Osama Alfarraj & Nasser Alalwan, 2020. "Modeling Blog Usage From a Developing Country Perspective Using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM)," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(3), pages 21582440209, July.
    16. Vithya Leninkumar, 2017. "The Relationship between Customer Satisfaction and Customer Trust on Customer Loyalty," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 7(4), pages 450-465, April.
    17. Judit Oláh & Attila Bai & György Karmazin & Péter Balogh & József Popp, 2017. "The Role Played by Trust and Its Effect on the Competiveness of Logistics Service Providers in Hungary," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-22, December.
    18. Valentin-Marian Antohi & Monica Laura Zlati & Romeo Victor Ionescu & Mihaela Neculita & Raluca Rusu & Aurelian Constantin, 2020. "Attracting European Funds in the Romanian Economy and Leverage Points for Securing their Sustainable Management: A Critical Auditing Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-27, July.
    19. Carmenta, Rachel & Cammelli, Federico & Dressler, Wolfram & Verbicaro, Camila & Zaehringer, Julie G., 2021. "Between a rock and a hard place: The burdens of uncontrolled fire for smallholders across the tropics," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    20. Dai, Jiangyu & Wu, Shiqiang & Han, Guoyi & Weinberg, Josh & Xie, Xinghua & Wu, Xiufeng & Song, Xingqiang & Jia, Benyou & Xue, Wanyun & Yang, Qianqian, 2018. "Water-energy nexus: A review of methods and tools for macro-assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 393-408.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:23:p:6722-:d:291465. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.