IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i19p5311-d270952.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Environmental Management System Integration and Business Performance: A Balance Assessment Approach Using Fuzzy Logic

Author

Listed:
  • Ionut Viorel Herghiligiu

    (Faculty of Industrial Design and Business Management, „Gheorghe Asachi” Technical University of Iași, 700050 Iași, Romania
    Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, „Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University of Iași, 700505 Iași, Romania)

  • Ioan-Bogdan Robu

    (Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, „Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University of Iași, 700505 Iași, Romania)

  • Marius Pislaru

    (Faculty of Industrial Design and Business Management, „Gheorghe Asachi” Technical University of Iași, 700050 Iași, Romania)

  • Adrian Vilcu

    (Faculty of Industrial Design and Business Management, „Gheorghe Asachi” Technical University of Iași, 700050 Iași, Romania)

  • Anca Laura Asandului

    (Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, „Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University of Iași, 700505 Iași, Romania)

  • Silvia Avasilcăi

    (Faculty of Industrial Design and Business Management, „Gheorghe Asachi” Technical University of Iași, 700050 Iași, Romania)

  • Catalin Balan

    (“Cristofor Simionescu” Faculty of Chemical Engineering and Environmental Protection, „Gheorghe Asachi” Technical University of Iași, 700050 Iași, Romania)

Abstract

Companies constantly thrive to enhance their performance in order to achieve their environmental, social, and economic goals. One way to achieve these goals is to integrate some effective management tools, such as an environmental management system (EMS), that can support sustainable development and value creation. Based on the literature, in this study some EMS integration dimensions were identified that can be used to assess its influence on business performance. The study was conducted on SMEs listed on the AeRO-Bucharest Stock Exchange that voluntary apply the ISO 14001 EMS, using a quantitative approach. To assess the EMS integration score, principal component analysis was used. Using logistic regression analysis, business performance probability (quantified by return on assets) was estimated for each company included in the final sample. Fuzzy logic was further used for modelling the influence of EMS integration on business performance probability. The research results showed that EMS integration has different effects on business performance probability, considering the influence of activity field and environmental management experience. This research assertion could be extended for all the listed Romanian companies or for major companies at the EU level.

Suggested Citation

  • Ionut Viorel Herghiligiu & Ioan-Bogdan Robu & Marius Pislaru & Adrian Vilcu & Anca Laura Asandului & Silvia Avasilcăi & Catalin Balan, 2019. "Sustainable Environmental Management System Integration and Business Performance: A Balance Assessment Approach Using Fuzzy Logic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-30, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:19:p:5311-:d:270952
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/19/5311/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/19/5311/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carlos Cândido & Luis M.S. Coelho & Ruben Peixinho, 2016. "The Financial Impact of a Withdrawn ISO 9001 Certificate," CEFAGE-UE Working Papers 2016_01, University of Evora, CEFAGE-UE (Portugal).
    2. BLOME, Constantin & PAULRAJ, Antony & DE JONG, Pieter, 2014. "The financial impact of ISO 14001 certification: top-line, bottom-line, or both?," LIDAM Reprints CORE 2709, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    3. Konstantinos Iatridis & Effie Kesidou, 2018. "What Drives Substantive Versus Symbolic Implementation of ISO 14001 in a Time of Economic Crisis? Insights from Greek Manufacturing Companies," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 148(4), pages 859-877, April.
    4. Eleonora Bottani & Maria Carmen Gentilotti & Marta Rinaldi, 2017. "A Fuzzy Logic-Based Tool for the Assessment of Corporate Sustainability: A Case Study in the Food Machinery Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-29, April.
    5. Charles J. Corbett & María J. Montes-Sancho & David A. Kirsch, 2005. "The Financial Impact of ISO 9000 Certification in the United States: An Empirical Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(7), pages 1046-1059, July.
    6. Guoyou Qi & Saixing Zeng & Xiaodong Li & Chiming Tam, 2012. "Role of Internalization Process in Defining the Relationship between ISO 14001 Certification and Corporate Environmental Performance," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3), pages 129-140, May.
    7. Petra Christmann & Glen Taylor, 2006. "Firm self-regulation through international certifiable standards: determinants of symbolic versus substantive implementation," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 37(6), pages 863-878, November.
    8. A. Syed & I. Beg & A. Khalid, 2016. "Aggregation Methods For Fuzzy Judgments," Fuzzy Economic Review, International Association for Fuzzy-set Management and Economy (SIGEF), vol. 21(1), pages 3-21, May.
    9. Matthew Potoski & Aseem Prakash, 2005. "Covenants with weak swords: ISO 14001 and facilities' environmental performance," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(4), pages 745-769.
    10. Haitao Yin & Peter J. Schmeidler, 2009. "Why do standardized ISO 14001 environmental management systems lead to heterogeneous environmental outcomes?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(7), pages 469-486, November.
    11. Huiyun Lu & Shaojun Jiang & Wenyan Song & Xinguo Ming, 2018. "A Rough Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach for Sustainable Supplier Selection under Vague Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-20, July.
    12. Mihaela Simionescu & Yuriy Bilan & Stanisław Gędek & Dalia Streimikiene, 2019. "The Effects of Greenhouse Gas Emissions on Cereal Production in the European Union," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-24, June.
    13. Pieter Jong & Antony Paulraj & Constantin Blome, 2014. "The Financial Impact of ISO 14001 Certification: Top-Line, Bottom-Line, or Both?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 119(1), pages 131-149, January.
    14. repec:dau:papers:123456789/7450 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Bill Hopwood & Mary Mellor & Geoff O'Brien, 2005. "Sustainable development: mapping different approaches," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 13(1), pages 38-52.
    16. Filip, Andrei & Raffournier, Bernard, 2010. "The value relevance of earnings in a transition economy: The case of Romania," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 77-103, March.
    17. Patrícia Tourais & Nuno Videira, 2016. "Why, How and What do Organizations Achieve with the Implementation of Environmental Management Systems?—Lessons from a Comprehensive Review on the Eco-Management and Audit Scheme," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-25, March.
    18. Taiwen Feng & Dan Wang, 2016. "The Influence of Environmental Management Systems on Financial Performance: A Moderated-Mediation Analysis," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 135(2), pages 265-278, May.
    19. Hammad Riaz & Abubakr Saeed & Muhammad Saad Baloch & Nasrullah & Zeeshan Ahmad Khan, 2019. "Valuation of Environmental Management Standard ISO 14001: Evidence from an Emerging Market," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, January.
    20. Daniel A. Levinthal & James G. March, 1993. "The myopia of learning," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(S2), pages 95-112, December.
    21. Aravind, Deepa & Christmann, Petra, 2011. "Decoupling of Standard Implementation from Certification: Does Quality of ISO 14001 Implementation Affect Facilities’ Environmental Performance?," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(1), pages 73-102, January.
    22. Marco Pesce & Chenyi Shi & Andrea Critto & Xiaohui Wang & Antonio Marcomini, 2018. "SWOT Analysis of the Application of International Standard ISO 14001 in the Chinese Context. A Case Study of Guangdong Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-19, September.
    23. Harjeet KAUR, 2011. "Soft Ems Hard Ems And Environmental Performance Relationships A Review Of The Literature," Journal of Advanced Research in Management, ASERS Publishing, vol. 2(1), pages 34-41.
    24. Barber, Brad M. & Lyon, John D., 1996. "Detecting abnormal operating performance: The empirical power and specification of test statistics," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 359-399, July.
    25. Luis Miguel Fonseca & José Pedro Domingues, 2018. "Exploratory Research of ISO 14001:2015 Transition among Portuguese Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-16, March.
    26. Nonaka, Ikujiro & Kodama, Mitsuru & Hirose, Ayano & Kohlbacher, Florian, 2014. "Dynamic fractal organizations for promoting knowledge-based transformation – A new paradigm for organizational theory," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 137-146.
    27. Phillis, Yannis A. & Grigoroudis, Evangelos & Kouikoglou, Vassilis S., 2011. "Sustainability ranking and improvement of countries," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(3), pages 542-553, January.
    28. Olivier Boiral, 2007. "Corporate Greening Through ISO 14001: A Rational Myth?," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(1), pages 127-146, February.
    29. Boiral, Olivier & Sala, Jean-Marie, 1998. "Environmental management: Should industry adopt ISO 14001?," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 57-64.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nursyazwani Mohd Fuzi & Sabrinah Adam & Mohamad Rohieszan Ramdan & Sharon Yong Yee Ong & Juliana Osman & Subramaniam Kolandan & Siti Zubaidah Mohd Ariffin & Nor Sa’adah Jamaluddin & Karmilah Abdullah, 2022. "Sustainability Management Accounting and Organizational Performance: The Mediating Role of Environmental Management System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-17, November.
    2. Mariana Dubravská & Martina Marchevská & Petra Vašaničová & Rastislav Kotulič, 2020. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management Linkage: An Empirical Analysis of the Slovak Republic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-18, July.
    3. Jing Ma & Zhaoyun Yin & Zhengbing Guo, 2021. "Meta-Evaluation for the Evaluation of Environmental Management: Standards and Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-18, February.
    4. Helena Ranängen & Åsa Lindman, 2020. "Walk the Talk—A Sustainability Management System for Social Acceptance in Nordic Mining," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-27, April.
    5. Jose Andres-Jimenez & Jose-Amelio Medina-Merodio & Luis Fernandez-Sanz & Jose-Javier Martinez-Herraiz & Estefania Ruiz-Pardo, 2020. "An Intelligent Framework for the Evaluation of Compliance with the Requirements of ISO 9001:2015," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-23, July.
    6. Alla Kasych & Petr Suler & Zuzana Rowland, 2020. "Corporate Environmental Responsibility through the Prism of Strategic Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-29, November.
    7. Ramin Gharizadeh Beiragh & Reza Alizadeh & Saeid Shafiei Kaleibari & Fausto Cavallaro & Sarfaraz Hashemkhani Zolfani & Romualdas Bausys & Abbas Mardani, 2020. "An integrated Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model for Sustainability Performance Assessment for Insurance Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1, January.
    8. Despoina Dede & Eleni Didaskalou & Sotirios Bersimis & Dimitrios Georgakellos, 2020. "A Statistical Framework for Assessing Environmental Performance of Quality Wine Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-16, December.
    9. Agus Joko Pramono & Suwarno & Firdaus Amyar & Renny Friska, 2023. "Sustainability Management Accounting in Achieving Sustainable Development Goals: The Role of Performance Auditing in the Manufacturing Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-13, June.
    10. Joseph Obamen & Solomon Omonona & Olabanji Oni & Olamide Felix Ohunyeye, 2021. "Effect of Environmental Management Practices and Sustainability on Some Selected Manufacturing Firms in South East Nigeria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-16, September.
    11. Anrafel Souza Barbosa & Maria Cristina Basilio Crispim Silva & Luiz Bueno Silva & Sandra Naomi Morioka & Vinícius Fernandes Souza, 2023. "Integration of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) criteria: their impacts on corporate sustainability performance," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-18, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hammad Riaz & Abubakr Saeed & Muhammad Saad Baloch & Nasrullah & Zeeshan Ahmad Khan, 2019. "Valuation of Environmental Management Standard ISO 14001: Evidence from an Emerging Market," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, January.
    2. Iñaki Heras‐Saizarbitoria & Olivier Boiral & Alberto Díaz de Junguitu, 2020. "Environmental management certification and environmental performance: Greening or greenwashing?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2829-2841, September.
    3. Elisabet Garrido & Consuelo González & Raquel Orcos, 2020. "ISO 14001 and CO2 emissions: An analysis of the contingent role of country features," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 698-710, February.
    4. Pablo Arocena & Raquel Orcos & Fedaous Zouaghi, 2021. "The impact of ISO 14001 on firm environmental and economic performance: The moderating role of size and environmental awareness," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 955-967, February.
    5. Artitzar Erauskin‐Tolosa & Eugenio Zubeltzu‐Jaka & Iñaki Heras‐Saizarbitoria & Olivier Boiral, 2020. "ISO 14001, EMAS and environmental performance: A meta‐analysis," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 1145-1159, March.
    6. Laura Bravi & Gilberto Santos & Alessandro Pagano & Federica Murmura, 2020. "Environmental management system according to ISO 14001:2015 as a driver to sustainable development," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(6), pages 2599-2614, November.
    7. Erlantz Allur & Iñaki Heras-Saizarbitoria & Olivier Boiral & Francesco Testa, 2018. "Quality and Environmental Management Linkage: A Review of the Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, November.
    8. Alberto Díaz de Junguitu & Erlantz Allur, 2019. "The Adoption of Environmental Management Systems Based on ISO 14001, EMAS, and Alternative Models for SMEs: A Qualitative Empirical Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-17, December.
    9. Marco Pesce & Chenyi Shi & Andrea Critto & Xiaohui Wang & Antonio Marcomini, 2018. "SWOT Analysis of the Application of International Standard ISO 14001 in the Chinese Context. A Case Study of Guangdong Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-19, September.
    10. Ying Zhang & Hongfei Ruan & Guiyao Tang & Li Tong, 2021. "Power of sustainable development: Does environmental management system certification affect a firm's access to finance?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(8), pages 3772-3788, December.
    11. Luca Marrucci & Tiberio Daddi, 2022. "The contribution of the Eco‐Management and Audit Scheme to the environmental performance of manufacturing organisations," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1347-1357, May.
    12. Tiberio Daddi & Iñaki Heras‐Saizarbitoria & Luca Marrucci & Francesco Rizzi & Francesco Testa, 2021. "The effects of green supply chain management capability on the internalisation of environmental management systems and organisation performance," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(4), pages 1241-1253, July.
    13. Yanying Chen & Liang Ping & Feng Helen Liang, 2023. "Industry Reputation Crisis and Firm Certification: A Co-evolution Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 186(4), pages 761-780, September.
    14. José Álvarez-García & María De la Cruz Del RíoRama, 2016. "Sustainability and EMAS: Impact of Motivations and Barriers on the Perceived Benefits from the Adoption of Standards," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-18, October.
    15. Wenlong He & Rui Shen, 2019. "ISO 14001 Certification and Corporate Technological Innovation: Evidence from Chinese Firms," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(1), pages 97-117, August.
    16. Christian Valery Tayo Tene & Olivier Boiral & Iñaki Heras‐Saizarbitoria, 2021. "Does quality management improve the internalization of environmental practices? An empirical study in Africa," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 3053-3064, November.
    17. Iñaki Heras‐Saizarbitoria & Olivier Boiral & Erlantz Allur & María García, 2020. "Communicating environmental management certification: Signaling without signals?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 422-431, February.
    18. Hammad Riaz & Abubakr Saeed, 2020. "Impact of environmental policy on firm's market performance: The case of ISO 14001," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 681-693, March.
    19. Hernandez-Vivanco, Alfonso & Domingues, Pedro & Sampaio, Paulo & Bernardo, Merce & Cruz-Cázares, Claudio, 2019. "Do multiple certifications leverage firm performance? A dynamic approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 386-399.
    20. Neda Trifkovic, 2024. "Certifiable management standards, labor productivity, and worker wages: Evidence from the food sector in Vietnam," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(1), pages 161-184, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:19:p:5311-:d:270952. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.