IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i17p4767-d262850.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-Objective Cloud Manufacturing Service Selection and Scheduling with Different Objective Priorities

Author

Listed:
  • Wei He

    (School of Economics and Management, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China)

  • Guozhu Jia

    (School of Economics and Management, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China)

  • Hengshan Zong

    (Institute of systems engineering, China Aerospace Academy of Systems Science and Engineering, Beijing 100048, China)

  • Tao Huang

    (Center for Industrial Production, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Fibigerstraede 16, DK-9220 Aalborg, Denmark)

Abstract

In recent years, with the support of new information technology and national policies, cloud manufacturing (CMfg) has developed rapidly in China. About CMfg, scholars have conducted extensive and in-depth research, among which multi-objective service selection and scheduling (SSS) attracts increasing attention. Generally, the objectives of the SSS problem involve several aspects, such as time, cost, environment and quality. In order to select an optimal solution, the preference of a decision maker (DM) becomes key information. As one kind of typical preference information, objective priorities are less considered in current studies. So, in this paper, a multi-objective model is first constructed for the SSS with different objective priorities. Then, a two-phase method based on the order of priority satisfaction (TP-OPS) is designed to solve this problem. Finally, computational experiments are conducted for problems with different services and tasks/subtasks, as well as different preference information. The results show that the proposed TP-OPS method can achieve a balance between the maximum comprehensive satisfaction and satisfaction differences, which is conducive to the sustainable development of CMfg. In addition, the proposed method allows the preference information to be gradually clarified, which has the advantage of providing convenience to DM.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei He & Guozhu Jia & Hengshan Zong & Tao Huang, 2019. "Multi-Objective Cloud Manufacturing Service Selection and Scheduling with Different Objective Priorities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-24, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:17:p:4767-:d:262850
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/17/4767/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/17/4767/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jiajun Zhou & Xifan Yao, 2017. "A hybrid approach combining modified artificial bee colony and cuckoo search algorithms for multi-objective cloud manufacturing service composition," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(16), pages 4765-4784, August.
    2. Gang Liu & Lu Shi & Kevin W. Li, 2018. "Equitable Allocation of Blue and Green Water Footprints Based on Land-Use Types: A Case Study of the Yangtze River Economic Belt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-27, October.
    3. Chen, Jian & Huang, George Q. & Wang, Jun-Qiang & Yang, Chen, 2019. "A cooperative approach to service booking and scheduling in cloud manufacturing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(3), pages 861-873.
    4. Wei He & Guozhu Jia & Hengshan Zong & Jili Kong, 2019. "Multi-Objective Service Selection and Scheduling with Linguistic Preference in Cloud Manufacturing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-15, May.
    5. Tao, Fei & Zhao, Dongming & Yefa, Hu & Zhou, Zude, 2010. "Correlation-aware resource service composition and optimal-selection in manufacturing grid," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(1), pages 129-143, February.
    6. Chen, Liang-Hsuan & Tsai, Feng-Chou, 2001. "Fuzzy goal programming with different importance and priorities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(3), pages 548-556, September.
    7. Feng Xiang & Yefa Hu & Yingrong Yu & Huachun Wu, 2014. "QoS and energy consumption aware service composition and optimal-selection based on Pareto group leader algorithm in cloud manufacturing system," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 22(4), pages 663-685, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wei He & Guozhu Jia & Hengshan Zong & Jili Kong, 2019. "Multi-Objective Service Selection and Scheduling with Linguistic Preference in Cloud Manufacturing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-15, May.
    2. Haghnegahdar, Lida & Chen, Yu & Wang, Yong, 2022. "Enhancing dynamic energy network management using a multiagent cloud-fog structure," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    3. Shuangyao Zhao & Qiang Zhang & Zhanglin Peng & Xiaonong Lu, 2020. "Personalized manufacturing service composition recommendation: combining combinatorial optimization and collaborative filtering," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 40(3), pages 733-756, October.
    4. Shuangyao Zhao & Qiang Zhang & Zhanglin Peng & Xiaonong Lu, 0. "Personalized manufacturing service composition recommendation: combining combinatorial optimization and collaborative filtering," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-24.
    5. Shuai Zhang & Yangbing Xu & Wenyu Zhang & Dejian Yu, 2019. "A new fuzzy QoS-aware manufacture service composition method using extended flower pollination algorithm," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(5), pages 2069-2083, June.
    6. Jiae Zhang & Jianjun Yang, 2016. "Flexible job-shop scheduling with flexible workdays, preemption, overlapping in operations and satisfaction criteria: an industrial application," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(16), pages 4894-4918, August.
    7. Dong Yang & Qidong Liu & Jia Li & Yongji Jia, 2020. "Multi-Objective Optimization of Service Selection and Scheduling in Cloud Manufacturing Considering Environmental Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-19, September.
    8. Sharma, Dinesh K. & Jana, R.K., 2009. "A hybrid genetic algorithm model for transshipment management decisions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(2), pages 703-713, December.
    9. K. Taghizadeh & M. Bagherpour & I. Mahdavi, 2011. "An interactive fuzzy goal programming approach for multi-period multi-product production planning problem," Fuzzy Information and Engineering, Springer, vol. 3(4), pages 393-410, December.
    10. Seyed Sina Mohri & Meisam Akbarzadeh, 2019. "Locating key stations of a metro network using bi-objective programming: discrete and continuous demand mode," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 11(2), pages 321-340, August.
    11. Rifat G. Ozdemir & Ugur Cinar & Eren Kalem & Onur Ozcelik, 2016. "Sub-assembly detection and line balancing using fuzzy goal programming approach," International Journal of Data Analysis Techniques and Strategies, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(1), pages 65-86.
    12. R. Ghasemy Yaghin & S.M.T. Fatemi Ghomi & S.A. Torabi, 2015. "A hybrid credibility-based fuzzy multiple objective optimisation to differential pricing and inventory policies with arbitrage consideration," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(14), pages 2628-2639, October.
    13. Kargar, Bahareh & Pishvaee, Mir Saman & Jahani, Hamed & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing, 2020. "Organ transportation and allocation problem under medical uncertainty: A real case study of liver transplantation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    14. Fahimnia, Behnam & Jabbarzadeh, Armin, 2016. "Marrying supply chain sustainability and resilience: A match made in heaven," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 306-324.
    15. Wee, Hui-Ming & Lo, Chien-Chung & Hsu, Ping-Hui, 2009. "A multi-objective joint replenishment inventory model of deteriorated items in a fuzzy environment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(2), pages 620-631, September.
    16. Liang-chuan Wu & I-chan Tsai, 2014. "Three fuzzy goal programming models for index portfolios," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 65(8), pages 1155-1169, August.
    17. Kongar, Elif & Gupta, Surendra M., 2006. "Disassembly to order system under uncertainty," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 550-561, December.
    18. Awasthy, Prakash & Hazra, Jishnu, 2020. "Collaboration under outcome-based contracts for information technology services," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(1), pages 350-359.
    19. Chang, Ching-Ter, 2007. "Binary fuzzy goal programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 180(1), pages 29-37, July.
    20. Aouni, Belaid & Colapinto, Cinzia & La Torre, Davide, 2014. "Financial portfolio management through the goal programming model: Current state-of-the-art," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 234(2), pages 536-545.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:17:p:4767-:d:262850. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.