IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i16p4291-d255865.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Production in a Circular Economy: A Business Model for Re-Distributed Manufacturing

Author

Listed:
  • Chris Turner

    (Surrey Business School, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK)

  • Mariale Moreno

    (The Manufacturing Department, Cranfield University, Bedford MK43 0AL, UK)

  • Luigi Mondini

    (The Manufacturing Department, Cranfield University, Bedford MK43 0AL, UK)

  • Konstantinos Salonitis

    (The Manufacturing Department, Cranfield University, Bedford MK43 0AL, UK)

  • Fiona Charnley

    (Business School, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4PU, UK)

  • Ashutosh Tiwari

    (Department of Automatic Control & Systems Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK)

  • Windo Hutabarat

    (Department of Automatic Control & Systems Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK)

Abstract

The emergence of new technologies such as the Internet of Things, big data, and advanced robotics, together with risks such as climate change, rising labour costs, and a fluctuating economy, are challenging the current UK manufacturing model. In this paper, business models for re-distributed manufacture (RdM) are developed using anIDEF (Icam DEFinition for Function Modelling) description to serve as a guide for the implementation of the RdM concept in the consumer goods industry. This paper explores the viability of a re-distributed business model for manufacturers employing new manufacturing technologies such as additive manufacturing or three-dimensional (3D) printing, as part of a sustainable and circular production and consumption system. An As-Is value chain model is presented alongside the proposed new business model for a sustainable re-distributed manufacturing system. Both are illustrated via a case study drawn from the shoe manufacturing industry. The case study shows that there is a need for robust facilities in close proximity to the customer. These facilities are store fronts which can also manufacture, remanufacture, and provide services. The reduction in transportation and increase in customer involvement throughout the process are the main benefits that would accrue if a re-distributed model is implemented in the given industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Chris Turner & Mariale Moreno & Luigi Mondini & Konstantinos Salonitis & Fiona Charnley & Ashutosh Tiwari & Windo Hutabarat, 2019. "Sustainable Production in a Circular Economy: A Business Model for Re-Distributed Manufacturing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-19, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:16:p:4291-:d:255865
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/16/4291/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/16/4291/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vandermerwe, Sandra & Rada, Juan, 1988. "Servitization of business: Adding value by adding services," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 6(4), pages 314-324, December.
    2. Walter R. Stahel, 2016. "The circular economy," Nature, Nature, vol. 531(7595), pages 435-438, March.
    3. Colin Elman & John Gerring & James Mahoney, 2016. "Case Study Research," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 45(3), pages 375-391, August.
    4. N/A, 2015. "The UK economy," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 231(1), pages 3-3, February.
    5. N/A, 2015. "The UK Economy," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 233(1), pages 3-3, August.
    6. Vandermerwe, Sandra, 1990. "The market power is in the services: Because the value is in the results," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 8(4), pages 464-473, December.
    7. N/A, 2015. "The UK Economy," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 234(1), pages 3-3, November.
    8. Peter Lacy & Jakob Rutqvist, 2015. "Waste to Wealth," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-137-53070-7.
    9. N/A, 2015. "The UK economy," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 232(1), pages 3-3, May.
    10. Rayna, Thierry & Striukova, Ludmila, 2016. "From rapid prototyping to home fabrication: How 3D printing is changing business model innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 214-224.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dennis Fixler & Marina Gindelsky & David S. Johnson, 2020. "Distributing Personal Income: Trends over Time," NBER Chapters, in: Measuring Distribution and Mobility of Income and Wealth, pages 589-603, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Steve Harris & Jan Weinzettel & Gregor Levin, 2020. "Implications of Low Carbon City Sustainability Strategies for 2050," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-23, July.
    3. Swati Sharma, 2021. "Towards an Understanding of the Indian Tourist Buying Airbnb Services," International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management (IJABIM), IGI Global, vol. 12(3), pages 1-14, July.
    4. Olga Porro & Francesc Pardo-Bosch & Núria Agell & Mónica Sánchez, 2020. "Understanding Location Decisions of Energy Multinational Enterprises within the European Smart Cities’ Context: An Integrated AHP and Extended Fuzzy Linguistic TOPSIS Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-29, May.
    5. Lijuan Wang & Songbai Liu, 2020. "Study on the Influencing Factors and Consumer Behaviors of Bicycle Sharing in Beijing," International Journal of Marketing Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(1), pages 1-40, March.
    6. Mustapha Ziky & Raja Daouah, 2019. "Exploring Small and Medium Enterprises¡¯ Perceptions Towards Islamic Banking Products in Morocco," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(10), pages 106-117, October.
    7. Stefan Ćetković & Aron Buzogány & Miranda Schreurs, 2016. "Varieties of clean energy transitions in Europe: Political-economic foundations of onshore and offshore wind development," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2016-18, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    8. Magali Duque & Abigail McKnight, 2019. "Understanding the relationship between inequalities and poverty: mechanisms associated with crime, the legal system and punitive sanctions," CASE Papers /215, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    9. Mohammed A. Al Yousif, 2020. "Renewable Energy Challenges and Opportunities in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(9), pages 1-1, September.
    10. Arye L. Hillman & Heinrich W. Ursprung, 2016. "Academic exclusion: some experiences," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 167(1), pages 1-20, April.
    11. Anđelković Aleksandra & Milovanović Goran, 2021. "Supplier Selection Process Based on Green Approach," Economic Themes, Sciendo, vol. 59(3), pages 391-407, September.
    12. Gkogkidis, Vasilis & Dacre, Nicholas, 2020. "Exploratory Learning Environments for Responsible Management Education Using Lego Serious Play," SocArXiv ek7th, Center for Open Science.
    13. István Kunos & Somayeh Kariman & Aigul Meirmanova, 2020. "Green Economy Sustainability in the UAE and Agrarian Leadership," Theory Methodology Practice (TMP), Faculty of Economics, University of Miskolc, vol. 16(02), pages 51-60.
    14. Massimo Peri, 2017. "Climate variability and the volatility of global maize and soybean prices," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 9(4), pages 673-683, August.
    15. Anelí Bongers & Carmen Díaz-Roldán, 2019. "Stabilization Policies and Technological Shocks: Towards a Sustainable Economic Growth Path," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, January.
    16. Jaakko J. Jääskeläinen & Sakari Höysniemi & Sanna Syri & Veli-Pekka Tynkkynen, 2018. "Finland’s Dependence on Russian Energy—Mutually Beneficial Trade Relations or an Energy Security Threat?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-25, September.
    17. repec:prg:jnlpep:v:preprint:id:686:p:1-19 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Renato Ritter, 2022. "Banking Sector Exposures to Climate Risks - Overview of Transition Risks in the Hungarian Corporate Loan Portfolio," Financial and Economic Review, Magyar Nemzeti Bank (Central Bank of Hungary), vol. 21(1), pages 32-55.
    19. Hee‐Chan Song, 2020. "Sufficiency economy philosophy: Buddhism‐based sustainability framework in Thailand," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 2995-3005, December.
    20. Duque, Magali & Mcknight, Abigail, 2019. "Understanding the relationship between inequalities and poverty: mechanisms associated with crime, the legal system and punitive sanctions," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 103459, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    21. Kolcava, Dennis & Bernauer, Thomas, 2020. "Greening the Economy Through Voluntary Private Sector Initiatives or Government Regulation? A Public Opinion Perspective," OSF Preprints zsk43, Center for Open Science.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:16:p:4291-:d:255865. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.