IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i12p3419-d241765.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of GHG Emission Methods Calculated by Applying Biomass Fraction at Sewage Sludge Incinerators in Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Seongmin Kang

    (Climate Chang Research Center, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Korea)

  • Sungheum Cho

    (Climate Chang Research Center, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Korea)

  • Ki-Hyun Kim

    (Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Korea)

  • Eui-chan Jeon

    (Department of Environment & Energy, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Korea)

Abstract

In this study, greenhouse gas (GHG) differences due to the application of biomass content are compared at a sewage sludge incinerator. The result of the comparison shows that the differences between the methods of GHG emission estimation based on biomass fraction analysis (sewage sludge analysis and sewage sludge flue gas analysis) were not substantial. On the other hand, the GHG emission estimated from the method in this study showed a difference of 8–9 ton CO 2 eq/day from the currently used method in Korea. This implies that the latter underestimates the GHG emissions because CO 2 emission was not taken into account upon estimating the GHG emission from sewage sludge. Therefore, it has been determined that, from now on, emissions due to CO 2 should be reflected in the estimation of GHG emission from sewage sludge.

Suggested Citation

  • Seongmin Kang & Sungheum Cho & Ki-Hyun Kim & Eui-chan Jeon, 2019. "Comparison of GHG Emission Methods Calculated by Applying Biomass Fraction at Sewage Sludge Incinerators in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-10, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:12:p:3419-:d:241765
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/12/3419/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/12/3419/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barbara Schlomann & Wolfgang Eichhammer, 2014. "Interaction between Climate, Emissions Trading and Energy Efficiency Targets," Energy & Environment, , vol. 25(3-4), pages 709-731, April.
    2. Seongmin Kang & Seungjin Kim & Jeongwoo Lee & Youngjae Jeon & Ki-Hyun Kim & Eui-chan Jeon, 2017. "A Study on Applying Biomass Fraction for Greenhouse Gases Emission Estimation of a Sewage Sludge Incinerator in Korea: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-7, April.
    3. Fatih Çipil, 2014. "Performance Analysis of Turkey's Transport Sector Greenhouse Gas Emissions," Energy & Environment, , vol. 25(2), pages 357-367, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Solaymani, Saeed, 2019. "CO2 emissions patterns in 7 top carbon emitter economies: The case of transport sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 989-1001.
    2. Fabio Zagonari, 2018. "Coherence, Causality, and Effectiveness of the EU Environmental Policy System: Results of Complementary Statistical and Econometric Analyses," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 70(1), pages 1-29, May.
    3. Karolina Wojtacha-Rychter & Piotr Kucharski & Adam Smolinski, 2021. "Conventional and Alternative Sources of Thermal Energy in the Production of Cement—An Impact on CO 2 Emission," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-15, March.
    4. Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki & Yuan, Yan & Goto, Mika, 2017. "A literature study for DEA applied to energy and environment," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 104-124.
    5. Seongmin Kang & Joonyoung Roh & Eui-chan Jeon, 2020. "Seasonal Variation Analysis Method of GHG at Municipal Solid Waste Incinerator," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-10, September.
    6. Seongmin Kang & Changsang Cho & Ki-Hyun Kim & Eui-chan Jeon, 2018. "Fossil Carbon Fraction and Measuring Cycle for Sewage Sludge Waste Incineration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-8, August.
    7. Wolfgang Eichhammer & Nele Friedrichsen & Sean Healy & Katja Schumacher, 2018. "Impacts of the Allocation Mechanism Under the Third Phase of the European Emission Trading Scheme," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-23, June.
    8. Quetzalli Aguilar-Virgen & Paul Taboada-González & Eduardo Baltierra-Trejo & Liliana Marquez-Benavides, 2017. "Cutting GHG Emissions at Student Housing in Central Mexico through Solid Waste Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-12, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:12:p:3419-:d:241765. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.