IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i10p2806-d231695.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A System Dynamics Model for CO 2 Mitigation Strategies at a Container Seaport

Author

Listed:
  • Yuliya Mamatok

    (Business School, Quanzhou Normal University, 398 DonghaiRoad, Quanzhou 362000, China
    Engineering Research Center on Cloud Computing & Internet of Things and E-commerce Intelligence of Fujian Universities, Quanzhou Normal University, 398 DonghaiRoad, Quanzhou 362000, China)

  • Yingyi Huang

    (Business School, Quanzhou Normal University, 398 DonghaiRoad, Quanzhou 362000, China
    Engineering Research Center on Cloud Computing & Internet of Things and E-commerce Intelligence of Fujian Universities, Quanzhou Normal University, 398 DonghaiRoad, Quanzhou 362000, China)

  • Chun Jin

    (Faculty of Management and Economics, Dalian University of Technology, 2 Linggong Road, Dalian 116024, China)

  • Xingqun Cheng

    (Faculty of Management and Economics, Dalian University of Technology, 2 Linggong Road, Dalian 116024, China)

Abstract

With the rapid development of the container shipping industry, the mitigation of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions from container seaport activities have become an urgent problem. Therefore, the purpose of this research is to investigate dynamic problems in mitigation strategies at a container seaport. As a result, a system dynamics model for CO 2 mitigation strategies at a container seaport was established. Three methods were combined to construct the system dynamics model: the activity-based method to estimate CO 2 emissions; the representation of a container seaport as a system with several sub-systems; the system dynamics modeling for strategic decision-making in CO 2 mitigation strategies. The key model component was the amount of CO 2 emissions produced by container seaport activities. The other components represented container seaport operations and the main spots of CO 2 concentration at berth, yard, gates, and region areas. Several CO 2 mitigation strategies were included in the model to be simulated. The real case of Qingdao Port in China was used to simulate the scenarios of the current situation with CO 2 emission amounts and the increasing container throughput. The other scenarios demonstrate the effects from CO 2 mitigation strategies, such as operating time optimization, spatial measures, equipment modernization, and modal shift. The obtained results enable container seaport executives to evaluate which mitigation scenario is more effective for every container seaport area. The system dynamics model serves as a useful decision-making mechanism providing flexibility and variability in strategic planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuliya Mamatok & Yingyi Huang & Chun Jin & Xingqun Cheng, 2019. "A System Dynamics Model for CO 2 Mitigation Strategies at a Container Seaport," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-19, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:10:p:2806-:d:231695
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/10/2806/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/10/2806/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Clare Linton & Susan Grant-Muller & William F. Gale, 2015. "Approaches and Techniques for Modelling CO 2 Emissions from Road Transport," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(4), pages 533-553, July.
    2. Xiaoqiao Geng & Yuanqiao Wen & Chunhui Zhou & Changshi Xiao, 2017. "Establishment of the Sustainable Ecosystem for the Regional Shipping Industry Based on System Dynamics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-18, May.
    3. van Vuuren, Detlef P. & Hoogwijk, Monique & Barker, Terry & Riahi, Keywan & Boeters, Stefan & Chateau, Jean & Scrieciu, Serban & van Vliet, Jasper & Masui, Toshihiko & Blok, Kornelis & Blomen, Eliane , 2009. "Comparison of top-down and bottom-up estimates of sectoral and regional greenhouse gas emission reduction potentials," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(12), pages 5125-5139, December.
    4. Carlo, Héctor J. & Vis, Iris F.A. & Roodbergen, Kees Jan, 2014. "Transport operations in container terminals: Literature overview, trends, research directions and classification scheme," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 236(1), pages 1-13.
    5. Jasmine Siu Lee Lam & Theo Notteboom, 2014. "The Greening of Ports: A Comparison of Port Management Tools Used by Leading Ports in Asia and Europe," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(2), pages 169-189, March.
    6. Michele Acciaro & Thierry Vanelslander & Christa Sys & Claudio Ferrari & Athena Roumboutsos & Genevieve Giuliano & Jasmine Siu Lee Lam & Seraphim Kapros, 2014. "Environmental sustainability in seaports: a framework for successful innovation," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(5), pages 480-500, September.
    7. Yuliya Mamatok & Chun Jin, 2017. "An integrated framework for carbon footprinting at container seaports: the case study of a Chinese port," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(2), pages 208-226, February.
    8. Luis Marenco & Víctor Cantillo, 2015. "A framework to evaluate particulate matter emissions in bulk material ports: case study of Colombian coal terminals," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(4), pages 335-361, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mateusz Zając, 2022. "The Analysis of Selected Factors Improving the Cargo Susceptibility to Modal Shift," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-16, November.
    2. Yan Li & Xiaohan Zhang & Kaiyue Lin & Qingbo Huang, 2019. "The Analysis of a Simulation of a Port–City Green Cooperative Development, Based on System Dynamics: A Case Study of Shanghai Port, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-20, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Iris, Çağatay & Lam, Jasmine Siu Lee, 2019. "A review of energy efficiency in ports: Operational strategies, technologies and energy management systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 170-182.
    2. Chun-Yu Lin & Gui-Lin Dai & Su Wang & Xiu-Mei Fu, 2022. "The Evolution of Green Port Research: A Knowledge Mapping Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-25, September.
    3. Eric Tamatey Lawer & Johannes Herbeck & Michael Flitner, 2019. "Selective Adoption: How Port Authorities in Europe and West Africa Engage with the Globalizing ‘Green Port’ Idea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-22, September.
    4. Bob Castelein & Ron van Duin & Harry Geerlings, 2019. "Identifying Dominant Stakeholder Perspectives on Sustainability Issues in Reefer Transportation. A Q-Method Study in the Port of Rotterdam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-21, June.
    5. Chin-Shan Lu & Kuo-Chung Shang & Chi-Chang Lin, 2016. "Examining sustainability performance at ports: port managers’ perspectives on developing sustainable supply chains," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(8), pages 909-927, November.
    6. Quintano, Claudio & Mazzocchi, Paolo & Rocca, Antonella, 2021. "Evaluation of the eco-efficiency of territorial districts with seaport economic activities," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    7. Laima Gerlitz & Christopher Meyer, 2021. "Small and Medium-Sized Ports in the TEN-T Network and Nexus of Europe’s Twin Transition: The Way towards Sustainable and Digital Port Service Ecosystems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-24, April.
    8. Di Vaio, Assunta & Varriale, Luisa & Alvino, Federico, 2018. "Key performance indicators for developing environmentally sustainable and energy efficient ports: Evidence from Italy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 229-240.
    9. Assunta Di Vaio & Luisa Varriale, 2018. "Management Innovation for Environmental Sustainability in Seaports: Managerial Accounting Instruments and Training for Competitive Green Ports beyond the Regulations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-35, March.
    10. Theo Notteboom & Jasmine Siu Lee Lam, 2018. "The Greening of Terminal Concessions in Seaports," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-17, September.
    11. Yunesky Masip Macía & Pablo Rodríguez Machuca & Angel Alexander Rodríguez Soto & Roberto Carmona Campos, 2021. "Green Hydrogen Value Chain in the Sustainability for Port Operations: Case Study in the Region of Valparaiso, Chile," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-17, December.
    12. Clemente, D. & Rosa-Santos, P. & Taveira-Pinto, F., 2021. "On the potential synergies and applications of wave energy converters: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    13. Anas S. Alamoush & Dimitrios Dalaklis & Fabio Ballini & Aykut I. Ölcer, 2023. "Consolidating Port Decarbonisation Implementation: Concept, Pathways, Barriers, Solutions, and Opportunities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-28, September.
    14. Theo Notteboom & Larissa van der Lugt & Niels van Saase & Steve Sel & Kris Neyens, 2020. "The Role of Seaports in Green Supply Chain Management: Initiatives, Attitudes, and Perspectives in Rotterdam, Antwerp, North Sea Port, and Zeebrugge," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-23, February.
    15. Sofia Agostinelli & Fabrizio Cumo & Meysam Majidi Nezhad & Giuseppe Orsini & Giuseppe Piras, 2022. "Renewable Energy System Controlled by Open-Source Tools and Digital Twin Model: Zero Energy Port Area in Italy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-24, March.
    16. Heilig, Leonard & Lalla-Ruiz, Eduardo & Voß, Stefan, 2017. "Multi-objective inter-terminal truck routing," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 178-202.
    17. Theo E. Notteboom & Hercules E. Haralambides, 2020. "Port management and governance in a post-COVID-19 era: quo vadis?," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(3), pages 329-352, September.
    18. Gaodan Deng & Jingxiao Chen & Quanlong Liu, 2022. "Influence Mechanism and Evolutionary Game of Environmental Regulation on Green Port Construction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-14, March.
    19. Izabela Kotowska & Marta Mańkowska & Michał Pluciński, 2018. "Inland Shipping to Serve the Hinterland: The Challenge for Seaport Authorities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, September.
    20. Lorenzo Franchi & Thierry Vanelslander, 2021. "Port Greening: Discrete Choice Analysis Investigation on Environmental Parameters Affecting Container Shipping Companies’ Behaviors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-19, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:10:p:2806-:d:231695. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.