IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i8p2936-d164392.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

China-Angola Investment Model

Author

Listed:
  • Liviu Stelian Begu

    (Faculty of Economic Cybernetics, Statistics and Informatics, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010374 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Maria Denisa Vasilescu

    (Faculty of Economic Cybernetics, Statistics and Informatics, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010374 Bucharest, Romania
    The National Scientific Research Institute for Labour and Social Protection, 010643 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Larisa Stanila

    (The National Scientific Research Institute for Labour and Social Protection, 010643 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Roxana Clodnitchi

    (The Faculty for Business Administration in Foreign Languages, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010374 Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

In the aftermath of Angola’s civil war, strong economic relations developed between the country and the People’s Republic of China. Our study addresses China’s investment risks in Angola, considering an infrastructure-for-petroleum partnership between these two countries. The main working hypothesis is that the recovery of Chinese investments made in Angola is has translated into thousands of barrels of petroleum being imported daily from Angola. We analyzed the main economic, social, and political indicators that describe the situation in Angola that could impact the recovery of Chinese loans in the form of oil exports. Data processing implied involved regression-based imputation, MinMax data normalization, the use of the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), and econometric analysis, next to the construction of a composite risk indicator. The results of the econometric analysis highlighted that an increase in the composite risk indicator of 1% leads to a decrease in the quantity of petroleum exported by almost 6377 barrels per day. Because, at least in the short run, the economic diversification in Angola is weak, and the most important asset is its oil, the partnership with China will continue to exist. This cooperation model represents a source of economic growth and infrastructure development for Angola and a source of energy that fuels China—one of the most powerful economies in the world.

Suggested Citation

  • Liviu Stelian Begu & Maria Denisa Vasilescu & Larisa Stanila & Roxana Clodnitchi, 2018. "China-Angola Investment Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-17, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:8:p:2936-:d:164392
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/8/2936/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/8/2936/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Habiyaremye, Alexis, 2016. "Is Sino-African trade exacerbating resource dependence in Africa?," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 1-12.
    2. Dumitru Miron & Alina Mihaela Dima & Simona Vasilache, 2010. "Models Of The Intra-Regional Trade Influence On Economic Sustainable Development In Romania," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 12(27), pages 27-35, February.
    3. Chuxiong Deng & Zhujun Jiang & Chuanwang Sun, 2018. "Estimating the Efficiency and Impacts of Petroleum Product Pricing Reforms in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-17, April.
    4. Allan Cain, 2017. "Alternatives to African commodity-backed urbanization: the case of China in Angola," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 33(3), pages 478-495.
    5. Renato Aguilar & Andrea Goldstein, 2009. "The Chinisation of Africa: The Case of Angola," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(11), pages 1543-1562, November.
    6. Alina Mihaela Dima & Simona Vasilache, 2016. "Credit Risk modeling for Companies Default Prediction using Neural Networks," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(3), pages 127-143, September.
    7. Jian Xu & Jin-Suo Zhang & Qin Yao & Wei Zhang, 2014. "Is It Feasible for China to Optimize Oil Import Source Diversification?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(11), pages 1-13, November.
    8. Julia Bader & Ursula Daxecker, 2015. "A Chinese resource curse? The human rights effects of oil export dependence on China versus the United States," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 52(6), pages 774-790, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bridget Tawiah Badu Eshun & Albert P.C. Chan, 2021. "An Evaluation of Project Risk Dynamics in Sino-Africa Public Infrastructure Delivery; A Causal Loop and Interpretive Structural Modelling Approach (ISM-CLD)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-24, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Covrig Mihaela & Goia Agoston Simona Irina & Igreţ Ramona Ştefania & Marinaş Cristian Virgil & Olariu Ana Alexandra & Roman Monica, 2022. "Discovering the tutors’ perspective on the quality of internship programs in a pandemic context," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 17(3), pages 306-327, September.
    2. Gabriella Y. Carolini, 2021. "Aid’s urban footprint and its implications for local inequality and governance," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(2), pages 389-409, March.
    3. Hadad Shahrazad, 2017. "Strategies for developing knowledge economy in Romania," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 12(3), pages 416-430, September.
    4. Yongrok Choi & Ning Zhang, 2015. "Introduction to the Special Issue on “the Sustainable Asia Conference 2014”," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-8, February.
    5. Marson, Marta & Savin, Ivan, 2022. "Complementary or adverse? Comparing development results of official funding from China and traditional donors in Africa," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 189-206.
    6. Paraschiv Dorel Mihai & ȚIțan Emilia & Manea Daniela Ioana & Ionescu Crina Dana & Mihai Mihaela & Șerban Octavian, 2022. "The change in e-commerce in the context of the Coronavirus pandemic," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 17(2), pages 220-233, June.
    7. Jennifer Robinson & Katia Attuyer, 2021. "Extracting Value, London Style: Revisiting the Role of the State in Urban Development," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(2), pages 303-331, March.
    8. Wegenast, Tim & Strüver, Georg & Giesen, Juliane & Krauser, Mario, 2017. "At Africa's Expense? Disaggregating the Social Impact of Chinese Mining Operations," GIGA Working Papers 308, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
    9. Brueckner, Marcus & Hong, Haidi & Vespignani, Joaquin, 2023. "Regulation of petrol and diesel prices and their effects on GDP growth: evidence from China," Working Papers 2023-02, University of Tasmania, Tasmanian School of Business and Economics.
    10. Sebastian Purwins, 2023. "Same Same, but Different: Ghana’s Sinohydro Deal as Evolved ‘Angola Model’?," Insight on Africa, , vol. 15(1), pages 46-70, January.
    11. Ou, Shiqi & Lin, Zhenhong & Xu, Guoquan & Hao, Xu & Li, Hongwei & Gao, Zhiming & He, Xin & Przesmitzki, Steven & Bouchard, Jessey, 2020. "The retailed gasoline price in China: Time-series analysis and future trend projection," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    12. Wang, Yuan, 2022. "Presidential extraversion: Understanding the politics of Sino-African mega-infrastructure projects," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    13. Adrian Dumitru Tantau & Maria Alexandra Maassen & Laurentiu Fratila, 2018. "Models for Analyzing the Dependencies between Indicators for a Circular Economy in the European Union," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-13, June.
    14. Stamule Stere, 2018. "Trends in ethnocentrism of Romanian consumers and their attitudes towards the marketplace," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 13(2), pages 996-1013, June.
    15. Baumgartner Boris, 2016. "Angola - an Oil Dependant Country in Sub-Saharan Africa," Studia Commercialia Bratislavensia, Sciendo, vol. 9(35), pages 233-242, December.
    16. Păunică Mihai & Motofei Cătălina & Tănase Gabriela Lidia & Manole Alexandru, 2018. "The Globalization in the actual Context of the European Union Economy," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 739-750, May.
    17. Frauke Urban & Johan Nordensvärd & Deepika Khatri & Yu Wang, 2013. "An analysis of China’s investment in the hydropower sector in the Greater Mekong Sub-Region," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 301-324, April.
    18. Curmei Cătălin-Valeriu & Dincă Lavinia Elena & Curmei-Semenescu Ileana Andreea, 2018. "The influence of the strategic financial policies on share valuation in an unstable economic environment," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 241-250, May.
    19. Alexandra Danila & Maria-Gabriela Horga & Oana Oprisan & Tanase Stamule, 2022. "Good Practices on ESG Reporting in the Context of the European Green Deal," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 24(61), pages 847-847, August.
    20. Kinfack, Emilie & Bonga-Bonga, Lumengo, 2020. "Trade Linkages and Business Cycle Co-movement: Analysis of Trade between African Economies and their Main Trading partners," Economia Internazionale / International Economics, Camera di Commercio Industria Artigianato Agricoltura di Genova, vol. 73(2), pages 275-306.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:8:p:2936-:d:164392. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.