IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i4p1066-d139450.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Supplier Risk Assessment Based on Best-Worst Method and K-Means Clustering: A Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Merve Er Kara

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Marmara University, 34722 Istanbul, Turkey)

  • Seniye Ümit Oktay Fırat

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Marmara University, 34722 Istanbul, Turkey)

Abstract

Supplier evaluation and selection is one of the most critical strategic decisions for developing a competitive and sustainable organization. Companies have to consider supplier related risks and threats in their purchasing decisions. In today’s competitive and risky business environment, it is very important to work with reliable suppliers. This study proposes a clustering based approach to group suppliers based on their risk profile. Suppliers of a company in the heavy-machinery sector are assessed based on 17 qualitative and quantitative risk types. The weights of the criteria are determined by using the Best-Worst method. Four factors are extracted by applying Factor Analysis to the supplier risk data. Then k-means clustering algorithm is applied to group core suppliers of the company based on the four risk factors. Three clusters are created with different risk exposure levels. The interpretation of the results provides insights for risk management actions and supplier development programs to mitigate supplier risk.

Suggested Citation

  • Merve Er Kara & Seniye Ümit Oktay Fırat, 2018. "Supplier Risk Assessment Based on Best-Worst Method and K-Means Clustering: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-25, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:4:p:1066-:d:139450
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/4/1066/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/4/1066/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sawik, Tadeusz, 2014. "Joint supplier selection and scheduling of customer orders under disruption risks: Single vs. dual sourcing," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 83-95.
    2. Anand Nair & Jayanth Jayaram & Ajay Das, 2015. "Strategic purchasing participation, supplier selection, supplier evaluation and purchasing performance," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(20), pages 6263-6278, October.
    3. Rezaei, Jafar & Ortt, Roland, 2013. "Multi-criteria supplier segmentation using a fuzzy preference relations based AHP," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 225(1), pages 75-84.
    4. Bottani, Eleonora & Rizzi, Antonio, 2008. "An adapted multi-criteria approach to suppliers and products selection--An application oriented to lead-time reduction," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 763-781, February.
    5. Ho, William & Xu, Xiaowei & Dey, Prasanta K., 2010. "Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(1), pages 16-24, April.
    6. Wu, Desheng Dash & Zhang, Yidong & Wu, Dexiang & Olson, David L., 2010. "Fuzzy multi-objective programming for supplier selection and risk modeling: A possibility approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(3), pages 774-787, February.
    7. Awasthi, Anjali & Govindan, Kannan & Gold, Stefan, 2018. "Multi-tier sustainable global supplier selection using a fuzzy AHP-VIKOR based approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 106-117.
    8. Chan, Felix T.S. & Kumar, Niraj, 2007. "Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 417-431, August.
    9. Guertler, Benjamin & Spinler, Stefan, 2015. "Supply risk interrelationships and the derivation of key supply risk indicators," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 224-236.
    10. Wu, Desheng & Olson, David L., 2008. "Supply chain risk, simulation, and vendor selection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(2), pages 646-655, August.
    11. Faiza Hamdi & Ahmed Ghorbel & Faouzi Masmoudi & Lionel Dupont, 2018. "Optimization of a supply portfolio in the context of supply chain risk management: literature review," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 29(4), pages 763-788, April.
    12. Chao Fang & Xiangxiang Liao & Min Xie, 2016. "A hybrid risks-informed approach for the selection of supplier portfolio," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(7), pages 2019-2034, April.
    13. Ting-Kwei Wang & Qian Zhang & Heap-Yih Chong & Xiangyu Wang, 2017. "Integrated Supplier Selection Framework in a Resilient Construction Supply Chain: An Approach via Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Grey Relational Analysis (GRA)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-26, February.
    14. Dong, Qingxing & Cooper, Orrin, 2016. "An orders-of-magnitude AHP supply chain risk assessment framework," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 144-156.
    15. Rezaei, Jafar, 2016. "Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method: Some properties and a linear model," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 126-130.
    16. Rezaei, Jafar, 2015. "Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 49-57.
    17. Amorim, Pedro & Curcio, Eduardo & Almada-Lobo, Bernardo & Barbosa-Póvoa, Ana P.F.D. & Grossmann, Ignacio E., 2016. "Supplier selection in the processed food industry under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(3), pages 801-814.
    18. PrasannaVenkatesan, S. & Goh, M., 2016. "Multi-objective supplier selection and order allocation under disruption risk," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 124-142.
    19. Zhaoxia Guo & Haitao Liu & Dongqing Zhang & Jing Yang, 2017. "Green Supplier Evaluation and Selection in Apparel Manufacturing Using a Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-13, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Baranauskaite Lina & Jurevicienė Daiva, 2021. "Identification of Lithuanian International Trade Risk in Beverages," Economics and Culture, Sciendo, vol. 18(1), pages 100-112, June.
    2. Naeini, Mina Alavi & Zandieh, Mostafa & Najafi, Seyyed Esmaeil & Sajadi, Seyed Mojtaba, 2020. "Analyzing the development of the third-generation biodiesel production from microalgae by a novel hybrid decision-making method: The case of Iran," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marcus V. C. Fagundes & Bernd Hellingrath & Francisco G. M. Freires, 2021. "Supplier Selection Risk: A New Computer-Based Decision-Making System with Fuzzy Extended AHP," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Faiza Hamdi & Ahmed Ghorbel & Faouzi Masmoudi & Lionel Dupont, 2018. "Optimization of a supply portfolio in the context of supply chain risk management: literature review," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 29(4), pages 763-788, April.
    3. Aly Owida & P.J. Byrne & Cathal Heavey & Paul Blake & Khaled S. El-Kilany, 2016. "A simulation based continuous improvement approach for manufacturing based field repair service contracting," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(21), pages 6458-6477, November.
    4. Marina Segura & Concepción Maroto & Baldomero Segura, 2019. "Quantifying the Sustainability of Products and Suppliers in Food Distribution Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-18, October.
    5. Hlioui, Rached & Gharbi, Ali & Hajji, Adnène, 2017. "Joint supplier selection, production and replenishment of an unreliable manufacturing-oriented supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 53-67.
    6. Chong Li & He Huang & Ya Luo, 2022. "An Integrated Two-Dimension Linguistic Intuitionistic Fuzzy Decision-Making Approach for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Supplier Selection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-24, September.
    7. Zhengmin Liu & Lin Li & Xiaolan Zhao & Linbin Sha & Di Wang & Xinya Wang & Peide Liu, 2020. "Selecting the Optimal Green Agricultural Products Supplier: A Novel Approach Based on GBWM and PROMETHEE II," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-23, August.
    8. Mohammed, Ahmed & Harris, Irina & Govindan, Kannan, 2019. "A hybrid MCDM-FMOO approach for sustainable supplier selection and order allocation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 171-184.
    9. Hosseininasab, Amin & Ahmadi, Abbas, 2015. "Selecting a supplier portfolio with value, development, and risk consideration," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(1), pages 146-156.
    10. Alikhani, Reza & Torabi, S. Ali & Altay, Nezih, 2019. "Strategic supplier selection under sustainability and risk criteria," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 69-82.
    11. Simon Li & Wei Zeng, 2016. "Risk analysis for the supplier selection problem using failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA)," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 27(6), pages 1309-1321, December.
    12. Amirmahdi Malek & Sadoullah Ebrahimnejad & Reza Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, 2017. "An Improved Hybrid Grey Relational Analysis Approach for Green Resilient Supply Chain Network Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-28, August.
    13. Felipe Barrera & Marina Segura & Concepción Maroto, 2022. "Sustainable Technology Supplier Selection in the Banking Sector," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-21, June.
    14. Fumin Deng & Yanjie Li & Huirong Lin & Jinrui Miao & Xuedong Liang, 2020. "A BWM-TOPSIS Hazardous Waste Inventory Safety Risk Evaluation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-18, August.
    15. Xiongyong Zhou & Zhiduan Xu, 2018. "An Integrated Sustainable Supplier Selection Approach Based on Hybrid Information Aggregation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-49, July.
    16. Dan-Ping Li & Li Xie & Peng-Fei Cheng & Xiang-Hong Zhou & Cheng-Xun Fu, 2021. "Green Supplier Selection Under Cloud Manufacturing Environment: A Hybrid MCDM Model," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, November.
    17. Kannan, Devika, 2021. "Sustainable procurement drivers for extended multi-tier context: A multi-theoretical perspective in the Danish supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    18. Mukherjee, Krishnendu, 2014. "Supplier selection criteria and methods: past, present and future," MPRA Paper 60079, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Morteza Yazdani & Dragan Pamucar & Prasenjit Chatterjee & Ali Ebadi Torkayesh, 2022. "“A multi-tier sustainable food supplier selection model under uncertainty”," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 116-145, June.
    20. Rabia Bovkir & Eda Ustaoglu & Arif Cagdas Aydinoglu, 2023. "Assessment of Urban Quality of Life Index at Local Scale with Different Weighting Approaches," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 165(2), pages 655-678, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:4:p:1066-:d:139450. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.