IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jstats/v4y2021i3p36-615d589298.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Parameter Choice, Stability and Validity for Robust Cluster Weighted Modeling

Author

Listed:
  • Andrea Cappozzo

    (MOX-Department of Mathematics, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Luis Angel García Escudero

    (Departamento de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Valladolid, 47002 Villadolid, Spain)

  • Francesca Greselin

    (Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Agustín Mayo-Iscar

    (Departamento de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Valladolid, 47002 Villadolid, Spain)

Abstract

Statistical inference based on the cluster weighted model often requires some subjective judgment from the modeler. Many features influence the final solution, such as the number of mixture components, the shape of the clusters in the explanatory variables, and the degree of heteroscedasticity of the errors around the regression lines. Moreover, to deal with outliers and contamination that may appear in the data, hyper-parameter values ensuring robust estimation are also needed. In principle, this freedom gives rise to a variety of “legitimate” solutions, each derived by a specific set of choices and their implications in modeling. Here we introduce a method for identifying a “set of good models” to cluster a dataset, considering the whole panorama of choices. In this way, we enable the practitioner, or the scientist who needs to cluster the data, to make an educated choice. They will be able to identify the most appropriate solutions for the purposes of their own analysis, in light of their stability and validity.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrea Cappozzo & Luis Angel García Escudero & Francesca Greselin & Agustín Mayo-Iscar, 2021. "Parameter Choice, Stability and Validity for Robust Cluster Weighted Modeling," Stats, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-14, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jstats:v:4:y:2021:i:3:p:36-615:d:589298
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-905X/4/3/36/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-905X/4/3/36/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert Tibshirani & Guenther Walther & Trevor Hastie, 2001. "Estimating the number of clusters in a data set via the gap statistic," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 63(2), pages 411-423.
    2. Salvatore Ingrassia & Antonio Punzo, 2020. "Cluster Validation for Mixtures of Regressions via the Total Sum of Squares Decomposition," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 37(2), pages 526-547, July.
    3. Glenn Milligan & Martha Cooper, 1985. "An examination of procedures for determining the number of clusters in a data set," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 50(2), pages 159-179, June.
    4. Andrea Cerioli & Marco Riani & Anthony C. Atkinson & Aldo Corbellini, 2018. "Rejoinder to the discussion of “The power of monitoring: how to make the most of a contaminated multivariate sample”," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 27(4), pages 661-666, December.
    5. Francesca Torti & Domenico Perrotta & Marco Riani & Andrea Cerioli, 2019. "Assessing trimming methodologies for clustering linear regression data," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 13(1), pages 227-257, March.
    6. Claeskens,Gerda & Hjort,Nils Lid, 2008. "Model Selection and Model Averaging," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521852258.
    7. Francesca Torti & Marco Riani & Gianluca Morelli, 2021. "Semiautomatic robust regression clustering of international trade data," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 30(3), pages 863-894, September.
    8. Andrea Cerioli & Marco Riani & Anthony C. Atkinson & Aldo Corbellini, 2018. "The power of monitoring: how to make the most of a contaminated multivariate sample," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 27(4), pages 559-587, December.
    9. Neykov, N. & Filzmoser, P. & Dimova, R. & Neytchev, P., 2007. "Robust fitting of mixtures using the trimmed likelihood estimator," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 299-308, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Julian Rossbroich & Jeffrey Durieux & Tom F. Wilderjans, 2022. "Model Selection Strategies for Determining the Optimal Number of Overlapping Clusters in Additive Overlapping Partitional Clustering," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 39(2), pages 264-301, July.
    2. Šárka Brodinová & Peter Filzmoser & Thomas Ortner & Christian Breiteneder & Maia Rohm, 2019. "Robust and sparse k-means clustering for high-dimensional data," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 13(4), pages 905-932, December.
    3. María Gallegos & Gunter Ritter, 2009. "Trimming algorithms for clustering contaminated grouped data and their robustness," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 3(2), pages 135-167, September.
    4. Cappozzo, Andrea & Greselin, Francesca & Murphy, Thomas Brendan, 2021. "Robust variable selection for model-based learning in presence of adulteration," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    5. Gallegos, María Teresa & Ritter, Gunter, 2010. "Using combinatorial optimization in model-based trimmed clustering with cardinality constraints," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(3), pages 637-654, March.
    6. Li, Pai-Ling & Chiou, Jeng-Min, 2011. "Identifying cluster number for subspace projected functional data clustering," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(6), pages 2090-2103, June.
    7. Pokojovy, Michael & Jobe, J. Marcus, 2022. "A robust deterministic affine-equivariant algorithm for multivariate location and scatter," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    8. Cyril Atkinson-Clement & Eléonore Pigalle, 2021. "What can we learn from Covid-19 pandemic’s impact on human behaviour? The case of France’s lockdown," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-12, December.
    9. Meng Li & Sijia Xiang & Weixin Yao, 2016. "Robust estimation of the number of components for mixtures of linear regression models," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 1539-1555, December.
    10. Öttl, Gerald & Böck, Philipp & Werpup, Nadja & Schwarze, Malte, 2013. "Derivation of representative air traffic peaks as standard input for airport related simulation," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 31-39.
    11. Kang-Ping Lu & Shao-Tung Chang, 2021. "Robust Algorithms for Change-Point Regressions Using the t -Distribution," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(19), pages 1-28, September.
    12. L. A. García-Escudero & A. Gordaliza & C. Matrán & A. Mayo-Iscar, 2018. "Comments on “The power of monitoring: how to make the most of a contaminated multivariate sample”," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 27(4), pages 605-608, December.
    13. Marco Riani & Anthony C. Atkinson & Francesca Torti & Aldo Corbellini, 2022. "Robust correspondence analysis," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(5), pages 1381-1401, November.
    14. J. Fernando Vera & Rodrigo Macías, 2021. "On the Behaviour of K-Means Clustering of a Dissimilarity Matrix by Means of Full Multidimensional Scaling," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 86(2), pages 489-513, June.
    15. Henner Gimpel & Daniel Rau & Maximilian Röglinger, 2018. "Understanding FinTech start-ups – a taxonomy of consumer-oriented service offerings," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 28(3), pages 245-264, August.
    16. Fissler Tobias & Ziegel Johanna F., 2021. "On the elicitability of range value at risk," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 38(1-2), pages 25-46, January.
    17. Peña-Malavera Andrea & Bruno Cecilia & Balzarini Monica & Fernandez Elmer, 2014. "Comparison of algorithms to infer genetic population structure from unlinked molecular markers," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 13(4), pages 1-12, August.
    18. Kojadinovic, Ivan, 2010. "Hierarchical clustering of continuous variables based on the empirical copula process and permutation linkages," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(1), pages 90-108, January.
    19. Zhiguang Huo & Li Zhu & Tianzhou Ma & Hongcheng Liu & Song Han & Daiqing Liao & Jinying Zhao & George Tseng, 2020. "Two-Way Horizontal and Vertical Omics Integration for Disease Subtype Discovery," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 12(1), pages 1-22, April.
    20. Yi Peng & Yong Zhang & Gang Kou & Yong Shi, 2012. "A Multicriteria Decision Making Approach for Estimating the Number of Clusters in a Data Set," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(7), pages 1-9, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jstats:v:4:y:2021:i:3:p:36-615:d:589298. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.