IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v11y2021i1p19-d512588.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Designing the Participation on Local Development Planning: From Literature Review to Adaptive Framework for Practice

Author

Listed:
  • Michal Hrivnák

    (Department of Regional and Rural Development, Slovak University of Agriculture, 949 76 Nitra, Slovakia)

  • Peter Moritz

    (Department of Regional and Rural Development, Slovak University of Agriculture, 949 76 Nitra, Slovakia)

  • Katarína Melichová

    (Department of Regional and Rural Development, Slovak University of Agriculture, 949 76 Nitra, Slovakia)

  • Oľga Roháčiková

    (Department of Public Administration, Slovak University of Agriculture, 949 76 Nitra, Slovakia)

  • Lucia Pospišová

    (Department of Public Administration, Slovak University of Agriculture, 949 76 Nitra, Slovakia)

Abstract

This exploratory review of the literature provides a comprehensive overview of the settings that are available to the planner when managing participatory strategic planning of spatial socio-economic development on the local level. We contextualize individual potential configurations of participation in local development planning practice, documented in a number of case studies from different parts of the world, in order to reflect the multidimensionality of the participatory planning process. These reflections are used to build a participation plan model, which aimed to help local planners, especially local governments, to optimize the participation of local stakeholders, according to the specifics of the local environment. The paper evaluates the options of planners to manage the participation from perspective of the organization of participation, the determination of its scope, selection of stakeholders, methods and techniques of communication, decision-making and visualization, as well as the deployment of resources, or the possibility of promotion and dissemination of information. As a practical implication of this review, we compose a participation matrix, which is intended to be an auxiliary tool for planners to establish own locally-specific participation plans and that can serve as tool for education, or life-long learning of planners.

Suggested Citation

  • Michal Hrivnák & Peter Moritz & Katarína Melichová & Oľga Roháčiková & Lucia Pospišová, 2021. "Designing the Participation on Local Development Planning: From Literature Review to Adaptive Framework for Practice," Societies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-25, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:11:y:2021:i:1:p:19-:d:512588
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/11/1/19/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/11/1/19/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kevin Ward, 2006. "‘Policies in Motion’, Urban Management and State Restructuring: The Trans‐Local Expansion of Business Improvement Districts," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 54-75, March.
    2. Karel Maier, 2001. "Citizen Participation in Planning: Climbing a Ladder?," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(6), pages 707-719, September.
    3. Enric Senabre Hidalgo & Mayo Fuster Morell, 2019. "Co-designed strategic planning and agile project management in academia: case study of an action research group," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 1-13, December.
    4. Jenny Stenberg & Lasse Fryk, 2021. "Making School Children’s Participation in Planning Processes a Routine Practice," Societies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, January.
    5. Maria Alina Rădulescu & Wim Leendertse & Jos Arts, 2020. "Conditions for Co-Creation in Infrastructure Projects: Experiences from the Overdiepse Polder Project (The Netherlands)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-21, September.
    6. Colin F. Camerer & Teck-Hua Ho & Juin Kuan Chong, 2004. "Behavioural Game Theory: Thinking, Learning and Teaching," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Steffen Huck (ed.), Advances in Understanding Strategic Behaviour, chapter 8, pages 120-180, Palgrave Macmillan.
    7. Joanna Saad-Sulonen, 2012. "The Role of the Creation and Sharing of Digital Media Content in Participatory E-Planning," International Journal of E-Planning Research (IJEPR), IGI Global, vol. 1(2), pages 1-22, April.
    8. Sisto, Roberta & Lopolito, Antonio & van Vliet, Mathijs, 2018. "Stakeholder participation in planning rural development strategies: Using backcasting to support Local Action Groups in complying with CLLD requirements," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 442-450.
    9. Andrea R. Roberts, 2020. "Preservation without Representation: Making CLG Programs Vehicles for Inclusive Leadership, Historic Preservation, and Engagement," Societies, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-17, August.
    10. Simin Davoudi & Paul Cowie, 2013. "Are English neighbourhood forums democratically legitimate?," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(4), pages 562-566, December.
    11. Mark Schneider & John Scholz & Mark Lubell & Denisa Mindruta & Matthew Edwardsen, 2003. "Building Consensual Institutions: Networks and the National Estuary Program," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 47(1), pages 143-158, January.
    12. Saku Mantere & Eero Vaara, 2008. "On the Problem of Participation in Strategy: A Critical Discursive Perspective," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(2), pages 341-358, April.
    13. Marcin Dąbrowski & Katarzyna Piskorek, 2018. "The development of strategic spatial planning in Central and Eastern Europe: between path dependence, European influence, and domestic politics," Planning Perspectives, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(4), pages 571-589, October.
    14. Eliahu Stern, 2013. "Demographic sustainability and rural development policy," Journal of Maps, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 154-160, June.
    15. Joan Marshall Wesley & Ester L. Ainsworth, 2018. "Creating Communities of Choice: Stakeholder Participation in Community Planning," Societies, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-19, August.
    16. Federica Cisilino & Alessandro Monteleone, 2020. "Designing Rural Policies for Sustainable Innovations through a Participatory Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-17, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Upham, Dr Paul & Sovacool, Prof Benjamin & Ghosh, Dr Bipashyee, 2022. "Just transitions for industrial decarbonisation: A framework for innovation, participation, and justice," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    2. Daniel Ioan Chiciudean & Rezhen Harun & Iulia Cristina Muresan & Felix Horatiu Arion & Gabriela Ofelia Chiciudean, 2021. "Rural Community-Perceived Benefits of a Music Festival," Societies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-13, June.
    3. Ashrika Sharma & Katherine Donovan & Sukanya Krishnamurthy & Maggie Creed, 2022. "Exploring the Scope of Public Participation for Risk Sensitive Land Use Planning in Nepal: A Policy Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sirén, Charlotta & Kohtamäki, Marko, 2016. "Stretching strategic learning to the limit: The interaction between strategic planning and learning," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 653-663.
    2. Kozarkiewicz Alina, 2018. "Between it and Societal Shift: Preconditions of Open Strategizing," Management Sciences. Nauki o Zarządzaniu, Sciendo, vol. 23(4), pages 3-8, December.
    3. John T. Scholz & Cheng‐Lung Wang, 2009. "Learning to Cooperate: Learning Networks and the Problem of Altruism," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(3), pages 572-587, July.
    4. Inger ROOS & Anders GUSTAFSSON & Bo EDVARDSSON & Peter LANDMARK, 2010. "Should We Differentiate Between Business And Private Customers?," Management Research and Practice, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2(3), pages 249-263, September.
    5. Vanesa Castán Broto & Harriet Bulkeley, 2013. "Maintaining Climate Change Experiments: Urban Political Ecology and the Everyday Reconfiguration of Urban Infrastructure," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(6), pages 1934-1948, November.
    6. Saskia Kuliga & Martin Berwig & Martina Roes, 2021. "Wayfinding in People with Alzheimer’s Disease: Perspective Taking and Architectural Cognition—A Vision Paper on Future Dementia Care Research Opportunities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-24, January.
    7. Domínguez-Gómez, J. Andrés & González-Gómez, Teresa, 2017. "Analysing stakeholders’ perceptions of golf-course-based tourism: A proposal for developing sustainable tourism projects," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 135-143.
    8. Evgenia Anastasiou & Stella Manika & Konstantina Ragazou & Ioannis Katsios, 2021. "Territorial and Human Geography Challenges: How Can Smart Villages Support Rural Development and Population Inclusion?," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-15, May.
    9. Michael Lounsbury & Christine M. Beckman, 2015. "Celebrating Organization Theory," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(2), pages 288-308, March.
    10. Antonio Ledda & Marta Kubacka & Giovanna Calia & Sylwia Bródka & Vittorio Serra & Andrea De Montis, 2023. "Italy vs. Poland: A Comparative Analysis of Regional Planning System Attitudes toward Adaptation to Climate Changes and Green Infrastructures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, January.
    11. Jelena Đurkin Badurina & Daniela Soldić Frleta, 2021. "Tourism Dependency and Perceived Local Tourism Governance: Perspective of Residents of Highly-Visited and Less-Visited Tourist Destinations," Societies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-13, July.
    12. Elena Igorevna Kudriavtseva, 0. "The Influence of Middle Managers on the Strategy of the Company: Dynamic Approach," Administrative Consulting, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. North-West Institute of Management., issue 5.
    13. Poul Houman Andersen & Lars Esbjerg, 2020. "Weaving a strategy for a base‐of‐the‐pyramid market: The case of Grundfos LIFELINK," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3687-3701, December.
    14. Albers, Hans-Hermann & Suwala, Lech, 2021. "Place leadership and corporate spatial responsibilities," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 108-130.
    15. Radomska Joanna & Hajdas Monika & Wołczek Przemysław & Glinka Beata, 2023. "Wide open? Creative industries and open strategizing challenges," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 59(2), pages 117-136, June.
    16. Stéphanie Dameron & Christophe Torset, 2014. "The Discursive Construction of Strategists' Subjectivities: Towards a Paradox Lens on Strategy," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(2), pages 291-319, March.
    17. Tomasz Kopczewski, 2011. "Auto-selection in an Online Experiment, p-Beauty Contest Game," Ekonomia journal, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw, vol. 26.
    18. Florence Allard-Poesi, 2015. "Dancing in the Dark: Making Sense of Managerial Roles during Strategic Conversations," Working Papers hal-01145772, HAL.
    19. Maurizio Prosperi & Roberta Sisto & Antonio Lopolito & Valentina C. Materia, 2020. "Local Entrepreneurs’ Involvement in Strategy Building to Facilitate Agro-Food Waste Valorisation within an Agro-Food Technological District: A SWOT-SOR Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-15, June.
    20. Roemer, Kelli F. & Haggerty, Julia H., 2021. "Coal communities and the U.S. energy transition: A policy corridors assessment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:11:y:2021:i:1:p:19-:d:512588. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.