IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v8y2019i1p28-d198793.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining the Emergence and Evolution of Blue Ocean Strategy through the Lens of Management Fashion Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Dag Øivind Madsen

    (Department of Business, Marketing and Law, School of Business, University of South-Eastern Norway, Bredalsveien 14, 3511 Hønefoss, Norway)

  • Kåre Slåtten

    (Department of Business, Marketing and Law, School of Business, University of South-Eastern Norway, Bredalsveien 14, 3511 Hønefoss, Norway)

Abstract

Blue Ocean Strategy (BOS) is a management concept which prescribes that organizations, rather than going head-to-head with competitors, try to create and exploit new market spaces, so-called blue oceans. Since its inception in the mid-2000s, BOS has become one of the most popular concepts in the field of strategy and one of the biggest buzzwords in the business world. This paper examines the emergence and evolution of BOS through the lens of management fashion theory. The analysis shows that the BOS concept exhibits several characteristics which makes it highly appealing to organizations and managers. In addition, the emergence of the concept was helped by a good fit with the zeitgeist in the field of strategy during the 2000s, which had shifted to a strong focus on theories and ideas about disruptive innovation and business model innovation. The popularization of the BOS concept can also be attributed to the backing of a powerful supply-side actors, and, in particular, the concept’s creators Kim and Mauborgne. While the attention given to BOS in public management discourse suggests that the concept can currently be considered highly fashionable, evidence about the concept’s use on the demand-side remains limited. Most surveys indicate that the adoption and diffusion is lower than would be expected based on the intensity of discourse surrounding the concept. Therefore, the current study provides some support for the view that supply-side and demand-side activity related to management fashions does not necessarily coevolve.

Suggested Citation

  • Dag Øivind Madsen & Kåre Slåtten, 2019. "Examining the Emergence and Evolution of Blue Ocean Strategy through the Lens of Management Fashion Theory," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-23, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:8:y:2019:i:1:p:28-:d:198793
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/8/1/28/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/8/1/28/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Hilb & Tomas Casas, 2015. "Towards a construct of entrepreneurial strategising: the case of private equity," International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(1), pages 84-101.
    2. Paula Jarzabkowski & Sarah Kaplan, 2015. "Strategy tools-in-use: A framework for understanding “technologies of rationality” in practice," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(4), pages 537-558, April.
    3. Burke, A.E. & van Stel, A.J. & Thurik, A.R., 2009. "Blue Ocean versus Competitive Strategy: Theory and Evidence," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2009-030-ORG, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    4. Mohammad Taghi Amini & Nahid Saravi-Moghadam, 2017. "Development of blue ocean strategy in dairy industry in Iran (evidence from Kalleh Company)," International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(3), pages 301-319.
    5. Aithal, Sreeramana, 2016. "The concept of Ideal Strategy and its realization using White Ocean Mixed Strategy," MPRA Paper 71770, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Arun Kumaraswamy & Raghu Garud & Shahzad (Shaz) Ansari, 2018. "Perspectives on Disruptive Innovations," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(7), pages 1025-1042, November.
    7. Jerzy Kociatkiewicz & Monika Kostera, 2016. "Grand plots of management bestsellers : learning from narrative and thematic coherence," Post-Print hal-02400981, HAL.
    8. Colwyn Jones, T. & Dugdale, David, 2002. "The ABC bandwagon and the juggernaut of modernity," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 27(1-2), pages 121-163.
    9. C. K. Prahalad & Gary Hamel, 1994. "Strategy as a field of study: Why search for a new paradigm?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(S2), pages 5-16, June.
    10. Avinash Dixit, 2014. "Strategy in History and (versus?) in Economics: A Review of Lawrence Freedman's Strategy: A History," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 52(4), pages 1119-1134, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dag Øivind Madsen & Kåre Slåtten, 2022. "The Possibilities and Limitations of Using Google Books Ngram Viewer in Research on Management Fashions," Societies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-12, November.
    2. Donnelly, Shannon & Gee, Liz & Silva, Emmanuel Sirimal, 2020. "UK mid-market department stores: Is fashion product assortment one key to regaining competitive advantage?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cannavale, Chiara & Esempio, Anna & Ferretti, Marco, 2021. "Up- and down- alliances: A systematic literature review," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(5).
    2. Rajdeep Grewal & Murali Chandrashekaran & F. Robert Dwyer, 2008. "Navigating Local Environments with Global Strategies: A Contingency Model of Multinational Subsidiary Performance," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(5), pages 886-902, 09-10.
    3. A. George Assaf & Alexander Josiassen & Haemoon Oh, 2016. "Internationalization and hotel performance," Tourism Economics, , vol. 22(3), pages 572-592, June.
    4. M Ashraf Al Haq & Norazlina Abd Wahab & Md. Mahmudul Alam, 2021. "Understanding The Impact Of Institutional Factors On Asnaf Sustainability: A Pls-Sem Approach," Journal of Islamic Monetary Economics and Finance, Bank Indonesia, vol. 7(4), pages 759-790, November.
    5. Patrick Spieth & Tobias Röth & Thomas Clauss & Christoph Klos, 2021. "Technological Frames in the Digital Age: Theory, Measurement Instrument, and Future Research Areas," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(7), pages 1962-1993, November.
    6. Quattrone, Paolo, 2009. "Books to be practiced: Memory, the power of the visual, and the success of accounting," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 85-118, January.
    7. Nicolas Berland & Yves Levant & Vassili Joannides, 2009. "Institutionalisation and deinstitutionalisation of budget. Symmetrical analysis of rhetoric associated to the introduction of budget and “beyond budgeting”," Post-Print hal-01661710, HAL.
    8. Simon Alcouffe & Pierre Mévellec, 2012. "Analyse de la littérature sur l'ABC et proposition d'une taxinomie," Post-Print hal-00936600, HAL.
    9. Papazov Emil & Mihaylova Lyudmila, 2016. "Using Key “Blue Ocean” Tools for Strategy Rethinking of a SME: A Case from the Bulgarian Knitwear Industry," Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 29(1), pages 104-110, August.
    10. Shapiro, Jeremy F., 1999. "On the connections among activity-based costing, mathematical programming models for analyzing strategic decisions, and the resource-based view of the firm," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 118(2), pages 295-314, October.
    11. Luoma, Jukka, 2016. "Model-based organizational decision making: A behavioral lens," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(3), pages 816-826.
    12. Stefan N. Groesser & Niklas Jovy, 2016. "Business model analysis using computational modeling: a strategy tool for exploration and decision-making," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 61-88, February.
    13. Shveta Kapoor & H.S. Sandhu, 2010. "Does it Pay to be Socially Responsible? An Empirical Examination of Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Financial Performance," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 11(2), pages 185-208, June.
    14. Rina Sandhu & Jane Baxter & David Emsley, 2008. "The Balanced Scorecard and its Possibilities: The Initial Experiences of a Singaporean Firm," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 18(1), pages 16-24, March.
    15. Adilson Carlos Yoshikuni & José Eduardo R. Favaretto & Alberto Luiz Albertin & Fernando de Souza Meirelles, 2018. "The Influences of Strategic Information Systems on the Relationship between Innovation and Organizational Performance," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 15(5), pages 444-459, September.
    16. Kristina Stoiber & Kurt Matzler & Julia Hautz, 2023. "Ambidextrous structures paving the way for disruptive business models: a conceptual framework," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 1439-1485, May.
    17. Uzunca, Bilgehan & Sharapov, Dmitry & Tee, Richard, 2022. "Governance rigidity, industry evolution, and value capture in platform ecosystems," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(7).
    18. Aithal, Sreeramana & Kumar, Suresh, 2016. "Comparative Analysis of Theory X, Theory Y, Theory Z, and Theory A for Managing People and Performance," MPRA Paper 72974, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Paula Andrea López López, 2013. "Una aproximación al campo de estudio del pensamiento estratégico desde las publicaciones académicas: de lo predecible a lo emergente," Revista Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Universidad Militar Nueva Granada, June.
    20. Rodney Coyte & Martin Messner & Shan Zhou, 2022. "The revival of zero‐based budgeting: drivers and consequences of firm‐level adoptions," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(3), pages 3147-3188, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:8:y:2019:i:1:p:28-:d:198793. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.