IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jrisks/v10y2022i6p111-d826214.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A New Class of Counting Distributions Embedded in the Lee–Carter Model for Mortality Projections: A Bayesian Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Yaser Awad

    (Sakhnin Academic College, Galilee St. 100, Sakhnin 30810, Israel)

  • Shaul K. Bar-Lev

    (Faculty of Industrial Engineering and Technology Management, HIT—Holon Institute of Technology, 52 Golomb Street, Holon 5810201, Israel)

  • Udi Makov

    (Actuarial Research Center, University of Haifa, 199 Aba Khoushy Ave. Mount Carmel, Haifa 3498838, Israel)

Abstract

The Lee–Carter model, the dominant mortality projection modeling in the literature, was criticized for its homoscedastic error assumption. This was corrected in extensions to the model based on the assumption that the number of deaths follows Poisson or negative binomial distributions. We propose a new class of families of counting distributions, namely, the ABM class, which belongs to a wider class of natural exponential families. This class is characterized by its variance functions and contains the Poisson and the negative binomial distributions as special cases, offering an infinite class of additional counting distributions to be considered. We are guided by the principle that the choice of distribution should be made from a pool of distributions as large as possible. To this end, and following a data mining approach, a training set of historical mortality data of the population could be modeled using the ABM’s rich choice of distributions, and the chosen distribution should be the one that proved to offer superior projection results on a test set of mortality data. As an alternative to parameter estimation via the singular value decomposition used in the classical Lee–Carter model, we adopted Bayesian estimation, harnessing the Markov Chain Monte Carlo methodology. A numerical study demonstrates that when fitting mortality data using this new class of distributions, while traditional distributions may provide desirable projections for some populations, for others, alternative distributions within the ABM class can potentially produce superior results for the entire population or particular age groups, such as the oldest-old.

Suggested Citation

  • Yaser Awad & Shaul K. Bar-Lev & Udi Makov, 2022. "A New Class of Counting Distributions Embedded in the Lee–Carter Model for Mortality Projections: A Bayesian Approach," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:10:y:2022:i:6:p:111-:d:826214
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/10/6/111/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/10/6/111/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wong, Jackie S.T. & Forster, Jonathan J. & Smith, Peter W.F., 2018. "Bayesian mortality forecasting with overdispersion," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 206-221.
    2. Katrien Antonio & Anastasios Bardoutsos & Wilbert Ouburg, 2015. "Bayesian Poisson log-bilinear models for mortality projections with multiple populations," Working Papers Department of Accountancy, Finance and Insurance (AFI), Leuven 485564, KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB), Department of Accountancy, Finance and Insurance (AFI), Leuven.
    3. Renshaw, A.E. & Haberman, S., 2008. "On simulation-based approaches to risk measurement in mortality with specific reference to Poisson Lee-Carter modelling," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 797-816, April.
    4. Joanne Ellison & Erengul Dodd & Jonathan J. Forster, 2020. "Forecasting of cohort fertility under a hierarchical Bayesian approach," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 183(3), pages 829-856, June.
    5. Thomas Buettner, 2002. "Approaches and Experiences in Projecting Mortality Patterns for the Oldest-Old," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(3), pages 14-29.
    6. Duolao Wang & Pengjun Lu, 2005. "Modelling and forecasting mortality distributions in England and Wales using the Lee-Carter model," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(9), pages 873-885.
    7. Czado, Claudia & Delwarde, Antoine & Denuit, Michel, 2005. "Bayesian Poisson log-bilinear mortality projections," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 260-284, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sixian Tang & Jackie Li & Leonie Tickle, 2022. "A New Fourier Approach under the Lee-Carter Model for Incorporating Time-Varying Age Patterns of Structural Changes," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-24, July.
    2. Annamaria Olivieri, 2023. "Special Issue “Actuarial Mathematics and Risk Management”," Risks, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-3, July.
    3. Shaul K. Bar-Lev & Ad Ridder, 2022. "The Large Arcsine Exponential Dispersion Model—Properties and Applications to Count Data and Insurance Risk," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(19), pages 1-25, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Blake, David & Cairns, Andrew J.G., 2021. "Longevity risk and capital markets: The 2019-20 update," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 395-439.
    2. Barigou, Karim & Goffard, Pierre-Olivier & Loisel, Stéphane & Salhi, Yahia, 2023. "Bayesian model averaging for mortality forecasting using leave-future-out validation," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 674-690.
    3. Wang, Pengjie & Pantelous, Athanasios A. & Vahid, Farshid, 2023. "Multi-population mortality projection: The augmented common factor model with structural breaks," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 450-469.
    4. Li, Johnny Siu-Hang, 2010. "Pricing longevity risk with the parametric bootstrap: A maximum entropy approach," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 176-186, October.
    5. Selin Özen & Şule Şahin, 2021. "A Two-Population Mortality Model to Assess Longevity Basis Risk," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-19, February.
    6. Gisou Díaz-Rojo & Ana Debón & Jaime Mosquera, 2020. "Multivariate Control Chart and Lee–Carter Models to Study Mortality Changes," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-17, November.
    7. Wong, Jackie S.T. & Forster, Jonathan J. & Smith, Peter W.F., 2018. "Bayesian mortality forecasting with overdispersion," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 206-221.
    8. Yang, Bowen & Li, Jackie & Balasooriya, Uditha, 2015. "Using bootstrapping to incorporate model error for risk-neutral pricing of longevity risk," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 16-27.
    9. Hong Li & Yang Lu, 2018. "A Bayesian non-parametric model for small population mortality," Post-Print hal-02419000, HAL.
    10. Salvatore Scognamiglio & Mario Marino, 2023. "Backtesting stochastic mortality models by prediction interval-based metrics," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 3825-3847, August.
    11. Feng, Ben Mingbin & Li, Johnny Siu-Hang & Zhou, Kenneth Q., 2022. "Green nested simulation via likelihood ratio: Applications to longevity risk management," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 285-301.
    12. Karim Barigou & Stéphane Loisel & Yahia Salhi, 2020. "Parsimonious Predictive Mortality Modeling by Regularization and Cross-Validation with and without Covid-Type Effect," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-18, December.
    13. Ungolo, Francesco & Kleinow, Torsten & Macdonald, Angus S., 2020. "A hierarchical model for the joint mortality analysis of pension scheme data with missing covariates," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 68-84.
    14. Blake, David & Dowd, Kevin & Cairns, Andrew J.G., 2008. "Longevity risk and the Grim Reaper's toxic tail: The survivor fan charts," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 1062-1066, June.
    15. Katrien Antonio & Anastasios Bardoutsos & Wilbert Ouburg, 2015. "Bayesian Poisson log-bilinear models for mortality projections with multiple populations," Working Papers Department of Accountancy, Finance and Insurance (AFI), Leuven 485564, KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB), Department of Accountancy, Finance and Insurance (AFI), Leuven.
    16. Blake, David & El Karoui, Nicole & Loisel, Stéphane & MacMinn, Richard, 2018. "Longevity risk and capital markets: The 2015–16 update," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 157-173.
    17. D’Amato, Valeria & Haberman, Steven & Piscopo, Gabriella & Russolillo, Maria, 2012. "Modelling dependent data for longevity projections," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 694-701.
    18. Leung, Melvern & Li, Youwei & Pantelous, Athanasios A. & Vigne, Samuel A., 2021. "Bayesian Value-at-Risk backtesting: The case of annuity pricing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(2), pages 786-801.
    19. Koissi, Marie-Claire & Shapiro, Arnold F., 2006. "Fuzzy formulation of the Lee-Carter model for mortality forecasting," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 287-309, December.
    20. David McCarthy & David Miles, 2013. "Optimal Portfolio Allocation for Corporate Pension Funds," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 19(3), pages 599-629, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:10:y:2022:i:6:p:111-:d:826214. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.