IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v10y2022i19p3715-d938241.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Large Arcsine Exponential Dispersion Model—Properties and Applications to Count Data and Insurance Risk

Author

Listed:
  • Shaul K. Bar-Lev

    (Faculty of Industrial Engineering and Technology Management, HIT—Holon Institute of Technology, Holon 5810201, Israel)

  • Ad Ridder

    (School of Business and Economics, Vrije University, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

Abstract

The large arcsine exponential dispersion model (LAEDM) is a class of three-parameter distributions on the non-negative integers. These distributions show the specific characteristics of being leptokurtic, zero-inflated, overdispersed, and skewed to the right. Therefore, these distributions are well suited to fit count data with these properties. Furthermore, recent studies in actuarial sciences argue for the consideration of such distributions in the computation of risk factors. In this paper, we provide a thorough analysis of the LAEDM by deriving (a) the mean value parameterization of the LAEDM; (b) exact expressions for its probability mass function at n = 0 , 1 , … ; (c) a simple bound for these probabilities that is sharp for large n ; (d) a simulation algorithm for sampling from LAEDM. We have implemented the LAEDM for statistical modeling of various real count data sets. We assess its fitting performance by comparing it with the performances of traditional counting models. We use a simulation algorithm for computing tail probabilities of the aggregated claim size in an insurance risk model.

Suggested Citation

  • Shaul K. Bar-Lev & Ad Ridder, 2022. "The Large Arcsine Exponential Dispersion Model—Properties and Applications to Count Data and Insurance Risk," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(19), pages 1-25, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:19:p:3715-:d:938241
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/19/3715/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/19/3715/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bent Jørgensen & Célestin Kokonendji, 2016. "Discrete dispersion models and their Tweedie asymptotics," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 100(1), pages 43-78, January.
    2. Rahma Abid & Célestin C. Kokonendji & Afif Masmoudi, 2021. "On Poisson-exponential-Tweedie models for ultra-overdispersed count data," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 105(1), pages 1-23, March.
    3. Hilbe,Joseph M., 2014. "Modeling Count Data," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107028333.
    4. Shaul K. Bar-Lev & Ad Ridder, 2019. "Monte Carlo Methods for Insurance Risk Computation," International Journal of Statistics and Probability, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(3), pages 1-54, November.
    5. Kunreuther, Howard & Novemsky, Nathan & Kahneman, Daniel, 2001. "Making Low Probabilities Useful," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 103-120, September.
    6. Yaser Awad & Shaul K. Bar-Lev & Udi Makov, 2022. "A New Class of Counting Distributions Embedded in the Lee–Carter Model for Mortality Projections: A Bayesian Approach," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, May.
    7. M. El-Morshedy & M. S. Eliwa & H. Nagy, 2020. "A new two-parameter exponentiated discrete Lindley distribution: properties, estimation and applications," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(2), pages 354-375, January.
    8. Deepesh Bhati & Hassan S. Bakouch, 2019. "A new infinitely divisible discrete distribution with applications to count data modeling," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(6), pages 1401-1416, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luiz Paulo Fávero & Joseph F. Hair & Rafael de Freitas Souza & Matheus Albergaria & Talles V. Brugni, 2021. "Zero-Inflated Generalized Linear Mixed Models: A Better Way to Understand Data Relationships," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-28, May.
    2. Howard Kunreuther & Erwann Michel-Kerjan, 2015. "Demand for fixed-price multi-year contracts: Experimental evidence from insurance decisions," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 171-194, October.
    3. Strauss, Jason, 2007. "Return-of-Premium Endorsements for Living-Benefits Insurance Policies: Rational or Irrational?," MPRA Paper 11103, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Wu, Jiang & Ou, Guiyan & Liu, Xiaohui & Dong, Ke, 2022. "How does academic education background affect top researchers’ performance? Evidence from the field of artificial intelligence," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(2).
    5. Yan, Jubo & Kniffin, Kevin M. & Kunreuther, Howard C. & Schulze, William D., 2020. "The roles of reason and emotion in private and public responses to terrorism," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 778-796.
    6. de Lauwere, Carolien & Slegers, Monique & Meeusen, Marieke, 2022. "The influence of behavioural factors and external conditions on Dutch farmers’ decision making in the transition towards circular agriculture," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    7. de Jong, Piet & Tickle, Leonie & Xu, Jianhui, 2020. "A more meaningful parameterization of the Lee–Carter model," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 1-8.
    8. Tiziana Pagnani & Elisabetta Gotor & Enoch Kikulwe & Francesco Caracciolo, 2021. "Livelihood assets’ influence on Ugandan farmers’ control practices for Banana Xanthomonas Wilt (BXW)," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 9(1), pages 1-19, December.
    9. Mutz, Rüdiger & Daniel, Hans-Dieter, 2018. "The bibliometric quotient (BQ), or how to measure a researcher’s performance capacity: A Bayesian Poisson Rasch model," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 1282-1295.
    10. Olivier Chanel & Graciela Chichilnisky, 2009. "The influence of fear in decisions: Experimental evidence," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 39(3), pages 271-298, December.
    11. Théodora Dupont-Courtade, 2012. "Insurance demand under ambiguity and conflict for extreme risks: Evidence from a large representative survey," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 12020, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    12. Kimberly S. Weems & Paul J. Smith, 2018. "Assessing the robustness of estimators when fitting Poisson inverse Gaussian models," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 81(8), pages 985-1004, November.
    13. Erwann Michel-Kerjan & Paul A. Raschky & Howard C. Kunreuther, 2009. "Corporate Demand for Insurance: An Empirical Analysis of the U.S. Market for Catastrophe and Non-Catastrophe Risks," Working Papers hal-00372420, HAL.
    14. Manzini Paola & Mariotti Marco, 2004. "A Theory of Vague Expected Utility," The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 4(1), pages 1-17, December.
    15. Chiara Bocci & Laura Grassini & Emilia Rocco, 2021. "A multiple inflated negative binomial hurdle regression model: analysis of the Italians’ tourism behaviour during the Great Recession," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 30(4), pages 1109-1133, October.
    16. repec:cup:judgdm:v:13:y:2018:i:3:p:237-245 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Thomas Kourouxous & Thomas Bauer, 2019. "Violations of dominance in decision-making," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 12(1), pages 209-239, April.
    18. Mark Browne & Christian Knoller & Andreas Richter, 2015. "Behavioral bias and the demand for bicycle and flood insurance," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 50(2), pages 141-160, April.
    19. Howard Kunreuther & Mark Pauly, 2006. "Rules Rather Than Discretion: Lessons from Hurricane Katrina," NBER Working Papers 12503, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. Andrea Morone & Ozlem Ozdemir, 2006. "Valuing Protection against Low Probability, High Loss Risks: Experimental Evidence," Papers on Strategic Interaction 2006-34, Max Planck Institute of Economics, Strategic Interaction Group.
    21. Jaffee Dwight M., 2009. "Monoline Regulations to Control the Systemic Risk Created by Investment Banks and GSEs," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 9(3), pages 1-22, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:19:p:3715-:d:938241. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.