IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v10y2022i17p3138-d903919.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A New Dynamic and Perspective Parsimonious AHP Model for Improving Industrial Frameworks

Author

Listed:
  • Gerarda Fattoruso

    (Department of Law, Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods, University of Sannio, 82100 Benevento, Italy)

  • Salvatore Scognamiglio

    (Department of Management and Quantitative Studies, University of Naples “Parthenope”, 80132 Naples, Italy)

  • Antonio Violi

    (Department of Law, Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods, University of Sannio, 82100 Benevento, Italy)

Abstract

Multi-criteria decision methods (MCDMs) are used as an effective tool to support decision makers (DMs) in critical decision processes. These methods are used in several fields of application by analyzing static decision-making problems in which it is assumed that the decision is made at a precise moment. By increasing the complexity of decision-making problems and operating in increasingly competitive production sectors, very often analyzing a decision-making problem in a static way is not enough. This paper deals with considering the temporal variable in the construction of a dynamic MCDM, which takes into account historical and current data in order to learn from the past; and prospective also allowing to have a forecasting perspective of future data through the use of techniques that work in this sense. Our approach was tested in a multinational company in the manufacturing sector. The results show that the use of dynamic approaches allows DMs to obtain more precise alternative rankings given the information they exploit from the past; furthermore, the use of the prospective model, integrated with the dynamic one, makes it possible to provide greater detail on the possible future rankings of the alternatives that update their positions based on the feedback received. The approach allows for drawing advantages from a management point of view as it defines a complete decision support tool for the choices related to the planning and control of production processes. Our approach can be implemented in corporate information systems. Furthermore, the involvement of the DM in the construction of the model helps to define a learning process that feeds the decision-making process by generating greater awareness of the DM on the choices to be made.

Suggested Citation

  • Gerarda Fattoruso & Salvatore Scognamiglio & Antonio Violi, 2022. "A New Dynamic and Perspective Parsimonious AHP Model for Improving Industrial Frameworks," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(17), pages 1-13, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:17:p:3138-:d:903919
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/17/3138/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/17/3138/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Salvatore Ammirato & Gerarda Fattoruso & Antonio Violi, 2022. "Parsimonious AHP-DEA Integrated Approach for Efficiency Evaluation of Production Processes," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-15, June.
    2. Ishizaka, Alessio & Siraj, Sajid, 2018. "Are multi-criteria decision-making tools useful? An experimental comparative study of three methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(2), pages 462-471.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Petr Iakovlevitch Ekel & Matheus Pereira Libório & Laura Cozzi Ribeiro & Mateus Alberto Dorna de Oliveira Ferreira & Joel Gomes Pereira Junior, 2024. "Multi-Criteria Decision under Uncertainty as Applied to Resource Allocation and Its Computing Implementation," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-20, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pishchulov, Grigory & Trautrims, Alexander & Chesney, Thomas & Gold, Stefan & Schwab, Leila, 2019. "The Voting Analytic Hierarchy Process revisited: A revised method with application to sustainable supplier selection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 166-179.
    2. Khalifa Mohammed Al-Sobai & Shaligram Pokharel & Galal M. Abdella, 2020. "Perspectives on the Capabilities for the Selection of Strategic Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-20, October.
    3. Paweł Karczmarek & Witold Pedrycz & Adam Kiersztyn, 2021. "Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process in a Graphical Approach," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 463-481, April.
    4. Pegah Eslamieh & Mehdi Shajari & Ahmad Nickabadi, 2023. "User2Vec: A Novel Representation for the Information of the Social Networks for Stock Market Prediction Using Convolutional and Recurrent Neural Networks," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-26, July.
    5. Jane Musole Kwenye & Xiaoting Hou Jones & Alan Renwick, 2023. "Understanding Land-Use Trade-off Decision Making Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process: Insights from Agricultural Land Managers in Zambia," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, February.
    6. Snežana Tadić & Mladen Krstić & Violeta Roso & Nikolina Brnjac, 2020. "Dry Port Terminal Location Selection by Applying the Hybrid Grey MCDM Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-22, August.
    7. Wenhui Zeng & Jiayuan Fan & Zhichao Ren & Xiaoyu Liu & Shuang Lv & Yuqian Cao & Xiao Xu & Junyong Liu, 2023. "Economic Evaluation Method of Modern Power Transmission System Based on Improved Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and Best-Worst Method-Anti-Entropy Weight," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-21, October.
    8. Mariana Sedliačiková & Nikolay Neykov & Ján Dobrovič & Anna Šatanová & Mária Osvaldová & Mykola Palinchak, 2024. "Performance measuring of wood-processing microenterprises through Data Envelopment Analysis: A case study of Slovakia, Poland, and Bulgaria," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 11(3), pages 408-422, March.
    9. Benítez, Julio & Carpitella, Silvia & Certa, Antonella & Izquierdo, Joaquín, 2020. "Constrained consistency enforcement in AHP," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 380(C).
    10. Haddad, M. & Sanders, D. & Tewkesbury, G., 2020. "Selecting a discrete multiple criteria decision making method for Boeing to rank four global market regions," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 1-15.
    11. Roszkowska Ewa & Wachowicz Tomasz, 2019. "The Impact of Decision-Making Profiles on the Consistency of Rankings Obtained by Means of Selected Multiple Criteria Decision-Aiding Methods," Econometrics. Advances in Applied Data Analysis, Sciendo, vol. 23(2), pages 1-14, June.
    12. Calabrese, Armando & Costa, Roberta & Levialdi, Nathan & Menichini, Tamara, 2019. "Integrating sustainability into strategic decision-making: A fuzzy AHP method for the selection of relevant sustainability issues," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 155-168.
    13. Alan Renwick & Robyn Dynes & Paul Johnstone & Warren King & Lania Holt & Jemma Penelope, 2019. "Challenges and Opportunities for Land Use Transformation: Insights from the Central Plains Water Scheme in New Zealand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-18, September.
    14. Tsai, Pei-Hsuan & Chen, Chih-Jou & Hsiao, Wei-Hung & Lin, Chin-Tsai, 2023. "Factors influencing the consumers’ behavioural intention to use online food delivery service: Empirical evidence from Taiwan," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    15. Gabriela Reis & Francisco Assis Souza Filho & Donald Robert Nelson & Renan Vieira Rocha & Samiria Maria Oliveira Silva, 2020. "Development of a drought vulnerability index using MCDM and GIS: study case in São Paulo and Ceará, Brazil," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 104(2), pages 1781-1799, November.
    16. Vladimír Bureš & Daniela Ponce & Pavel Čech & Karel Mls, 2019. "The effect of trial repetition and problem size on the consistency of decision making," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(5), pages 1-14, May.
    17. Mejías, Ana M. & Bellas, Roberto & Pardo, Juan E. & Paz, Enrique, 2019. "Traceability management systems and capacity building as new approaches for improving sustainability in the fashion multi-tier supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 143-158.
    18. Barbosa, Ailson de Souza & Shayani, Rafael Amaral & Oliveira, Marco Aurélio Gonçalves de, 2018. "A multi-criteria decision analysis method for regulatory evaluation of electricity distribution service quality," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 38-48.
    19. Wu, Yunna & Zhang, Ting & Xu, Chuanbo & Zhang, Xiaoyu & Ke, Yiming & Chu, Han & Xu, Ruhang, 2019. "Location selection of seawater pumped hydro storage station in China based on multi-attribute decision making," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 410-425.
    20. Torkayesh, Ali Ebadi & Rajaeifar, Mohammad Ali & Rostom, Madona & Malmir, Behnam & Yazdani, Morteza & Suh, Sangwon & Heidrich, Oliver, 2022. "Integrating life cycle assessment and multi criteria decision making for sustainable waste management: Key issues and recommendations for future studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:17:p:3138-:d:903919. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.