IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlogis/v7y2023i2p21-d1114390.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative Review of Air Drones (UAVs) and Delivery Bots (SUGVs) for Automated Last Mile Home Delivery

Author

Listed:
  • Fang Li

    (Institute for Logistics, Risk- and Resource Management (ILR), Neu-Ulm University of Applied Sciences, Wileystraße 1, 89231 Neu-Ulm, Germany)

  • Oliver Kunze

    (Institute for Logistics, Risk- and Resource Management (ILR), Neu-Ulm University of Applied Sciences, Wileystraße 1, 89231 Neu-Ulm, Germany)

Abstract

Background : UAVs (Unmanned Aerial Vehicles) and SUGVs (Sidewalk Unmanned Ground Vehicles) are two prominent options to revolutionize last mile home delivery. However, there is no literature yet addressing a comprehensive assessment of them. To bridge this research gap, this paper aimed to compare UAVs to SUGVs in the context of urban parcel delivery from a practical, conceptual, technological, commercial, and environmental perspective. Methodology : Based on structured literature and web research, this paper provided a comparative status quo review of these two delivery concepts. We introduced a parameter-based cost calculus model to estimate the costs per shipment for each technology. To detect the key cost drivers, we applied a one-way sensitivity analysis, as well as a “full factorial design of experiment” approach. Results : These key cost drivers for both operations are the “number of vehicles per operator” and the “average beeline service radius”. From today’s commercial point of view, our model indicated better profitability of SUGVs. However, technical and regulatory developments may render different results in the future. As SUGVs emit significantly less noise than UAVs, we assume that SUGVs have an additional advantage for usage in autonomous urban last mile delivery from a resident’s perspective. Conclusions : Both key cost drivers will significantly influence the commercial viability of unmanned home delivery services. Safety and security aspects will determine regulatory rules on “number of vehicles per operator”. To increase the “average beeline service radius”, UAVs could profit from mothership delivery concepts while SUGV delivery may co-use existing public transport infrastructure.

Suggested Citation

  • Fang Li & Oliver Kunze, 2023. "A Comparative Review of Air Drones (UAVs) and Delivery Bots (SUGVs) for Automated Last Mile Home Delivery," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-32, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:7:y:2023:i:2:p:21-:d:1114390
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/7/2/21/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/7/2/21/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nils Boysen & Stefan Fedtke & Stefan Schwerdfeger, 2021. "Last-mile delivery concepts: a survey from an operational research perspective," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 43(1), pages 1-58, March.
    2. Asma Troudi & Sid-Ali Addouche & Sofiene Dellagi & Abderrahman El Mhamedi, 2018. "Sizing of the Drone Delivery Fleet Considering Energy Autonomy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-17, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bahram Alidaee & Haibo Wang & Lutfu S. Sua, 2023. "The Last-Mile Delivery of Heavy, Bulky, Oversized Products: Literature Review and Research Agenda," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-16, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rave, Alexander & Fontaine, Pirmin & Kuhn, Heinrich, 2023. "Drone location and vehicle fleet planning with trucks and aerial drones," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(1), pages 113-130.
    2. Cheng, Chun & Adulyasak, Yossiri & Rousseau, Louis-Martin, 2020. "Drone routing with energy function: Formulation and exact algorithm," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 364-387.
    3. Yang Xia & Wenjia Zeng & Xinjie Xing & Yuanzhu Zhan & Kim Hua Tan & Ajay Kumar, 2023. "Joint optimisation of drone routing and battery wear for sustainable supply chain development: a mixed-integer programming model based on blockchain-enabled fleet sharing," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 327(1), pages 89-127, August.
    4. Vijoleta Vrhovac & Stana Vasić & Stevan Milisavljević & Branislav Dudić & Peter Štarchoň & Marina Žižakov, 2023. "Measuring E-Commerce User Experience in the Last-Mile Delivery," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-21, March.
    5. Liu, Dan & Kaisar, Evangelos I. & Yang, Yang & Yan, Pengyu, 2022. "Physical Internet-enabled E-grocery delivery Network:A load-dependent two-echelon vehicle routing problem with mixed vehicles," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    6. Fleckenstein, David & Klein, Robert & Steinhardt, Claudius, 2023. "Recent advances in integrating demand management and vehicle routing: A methodological review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(2), pages 499-518.
    7. Joonyup Eun & Byung Duk Song & Sangbok Lee & Dae-Eun Lim, 2019. "Mathematical Investigation on the Sustainability of UAV Logistics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-15, October.
    8. Björn Asdecker, 2021. "Building the E-Commerce Supply Chain of the Future: What Influences Consumer Acceptance of Alternative Places of Delivery on the Last-Mile," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-17, December.
    9. He, Dongdong & Ceder, Avishai (Avi) & Zhang, Wenyi & Guan, Wei & Qi, Geqi, 2023. "Optimization of a rural bus service integrated with e-commerce deliveries guided by a new sustainable policy in China," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    10. Grzegorz Radzki & Izabela Nielsen & Paulina Golińska-Dawson & Grzegorz Bocewicz & Zbigniew Banaszak, 2021. "Reactive UAV Fleet’s Mission Planning in Highly Dynamic and Unpredictable Environments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-23, May.
    11. Klein, Vienna & Steinhardt, Claudius, 2023. "Dynamic demand management and online tour planning for same-day delivery," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(2), pages 860-886.
    12. Ostermeier, Manuel & Heimfarth, Andreas & Hübner, Alexander, 2023. "The multi-vehicle truck-and-robot routing problem for last-mile delivery," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(2), pages 680-697.
    13. Meng, Shanshan & Guo, Xiuping & Li, Dong & Liu, Guoquan, 2023. "The multi-visit drone routing problem for pickup and delivery services," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    14. Wang, Haibo & Alidaee, Bahram, 2023. "White-glove service delivery: A quantitative analysis," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    15. Muriel, Juan E. & Zhang, Lele & Fransoo, Jan C. & Villegas, Juan G., 2024. "A reinforcement learning framework for improving parking decisions in last-mile delivery," Other publications TiSEM b3811dad-50fa-486b-8255-3, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    16. Juntunen, Jouni K. & Martiskainen, Mari, 2021. "Improving understanding of energy autonomy: A systematic review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    17. Sören Lauenstein & Christoph Schank, 2022. "Design of a Sustainable Last Mile in Urban Logistics—A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-14, May.
    18. Nils Boysen & Stefan Fedtke & Stefan Schwerdfeger, 2021. "Last-mile delivery concepts: a survey from an operational research perspective," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 43(1), pages 1-58, March.
    19. Liu, Zeyu & Li, Xueping & Khojandi, Anahita, 2022. "The flying sidekick traveling salesman problem with stochastic travel time: A reinforcement learning approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    20. Sergio Maria Patella & Gianluca Grazieschi & Valerio Gatta & Edoardo Marcucci & Stefano Carrese, 2020. "The Adoption of Green Vehicles in Last Mile Logistics: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-29, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:7:y:2023:i:2:p:21-:d:1114390. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.