IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlogis/v6y2022i1p9-d728990.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Logic of Collective Action for Rural Warehouse Condominiums

Author

Listed:
  • Amanda Cristina Gaban Filippi

    (Department of Business Administration, University of Brasília (UnB), Brasília 70910-900, Brazil
    Department of Economics, Goiás Federal University (UFG), Goiânia 74690-900, Brazil)

  • Patricia Guarnieri

    (Department of Business Administration, University of Brasília (UnB), Brasília 70910-900, Brazil)

  • Cleyzer Adrian da Cunha

    (Department of Economics, Goiás Federal University (UFG), Goiânia 74690-900, Brazil)

  • Alcido Elenor Wander

    (Department of Economics, Goiás Federal University (UFG), Goiânia 74690-900, Brazil
    EMBRAPA Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation, Brasília 70770-901, Brazil)

Abstract

Background: Given several bottlenecks in Brazil in distribution logistics, mainly in transport and warehouse activities, some new forms of collective action have appeared. The Condominiums of Rural Warehouses was conceived of to overcome these bottlenecks and provide better income and competitiveness to small producers in agribusiness. This article aims to analyse aspects of collective action with the focus of Rural Condominiums in the context of Brazilian agribusiness. Methods: We conducted exploratory, descriptive and qualitative research under the Theory of Logic of Collective Action lens for this purpose. Besides conducting a literature review, we conducted a semi-structured interview with the managers of the Rural Warehouse Condominiums. We analysed the data through a Categorial Content Analysis. Results: The main results show an approximation of the rural model of the Condominiums of Rural Warehouses with the Theory of Logic of Collective Action, mainly for small producers. Conclusions: We highlight the feasibility of the warehouse structure collectively, as it strengthens and provides greater efficiency to rural business and producers, inserts and integrates the industry into a competitive market environment, provides economic and social benefits, leads to cost reduction, and increased profit. The economic, social and logistical determinants show the product’s commercialisation, logistical gains, and the producers’ association regarding the development and growth of rural collective action. This paper can be helpful for practitioners and researchers interested in this field.

Suggested Citation

  • Amanda Cristina Gaban Filippi & Patricia Guarnieri & Cleyzer Adrian da Cunha & Alcido Elenor Wander, 2022. "The Logic of Collective Action for Rural Warehouse Condominiums," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-25, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:6:y:2022:i:1:p:9-:d:728990
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/6/1/9/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/6/1/9/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zylbersztajn, Decio, 2005. "Papel dos Contratos na Coordenação Agro-Industrial: um olhar além dos mercados," Brazilian Journal of Rural Economy and Sociology (Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural-RESR), Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural, vol. 43(3), pages 1-36, September.
    2. Bijman, Jos & Hu, Dinghuan, 2011. "The Rise of New Farmer Cooperatives in China: Evidence from Hubei Province," Journal of Rural Cooperation, Hebrew University, Center for Agricultural Economic Research, vol. 39(2), pages 1-15.
    3. Abitante, Kleber Giovelli, 2008. "Co-integração entre os mercados spot e futuro: evidências dos mercados de boi gordo e soja," Brazilian Journal of Rural Economy and Sociology (Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural-RESR), Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural, vol. 46(1), pages 1-22, March.
    4. de Lima, Daruichi Pereira & Fioriolli, José Carlos & Padula, Antonio Domingos & Pumi, Guilherme, 2018. "The impact of Chinese imports of soybean on port infrastructure in Brazil: A study based on the concept of the “Bullwhip Effect”," Journal of Commodity Markets, Elsevier, vol. 9(C), pages 55-76.
    5. Simoes, Debora da Costa & Caixeta-Filho, Jose Vicente & Palekar, Udatta S., 2018. "Fertilizer Distribution Flows and Logistics Costs in Brazil: Changes and Benefits Arising from Investments in Port Terminals," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 21(3), March.
    6. Moyano-Estrada, Eduardo & Sacco dos Anjos, Flavio, 2001. "New Forms of Economic Cooperation in Family Agriculture: The Case of Condominios in Santa Catarina, Brazil," Journal of Rural Cooperation, Hebrew University, Center for Agricultural Economic Research, vol. 29(1), pages 1-23.
    7. Bijman, Jos & Hu, Dinghuan, 2011. "The Rise of New Farmer Cooperatives in China; Evidence from Hubei Province," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland 114252, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    8. Hellin, Jon & Lundy, Mark & Meijer, Madelon, 2009. "Farmer organization, collective action and market access in Meso-America," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 16-22, February.
    9. Reis, Silvia Araújo & Leal, José Eugenio, 2015. "A deterministic mathematical model to support temporal and spatial decisions of the soybean supply chain," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 48-58.
    10. Silva, Márcio Gomes da & Dias, Marcelo Miná & Silva, Sandro Pereira, 2014. "Relações e Estratégias de (Des)envolvimento Rural: políticas públicas, agricultura familiar e dinâmicas locais no município de Espera Feliz (MG)," Brazilian Journal of Rural Economy and Sociology (Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural-RESR), Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural, vol. 52(2), pages 1-20, June.
    11. Gian Nicola Francesconi & Nico Heerink, 2011. "Ethiopian Agricultural Cooperatives in an Era of Global Commodity Exchange: Does Organisational Form Matter?," Journal of African Economies, Centre for the Study of African Economies, vol. 20(1), pages 153-177, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Filippi, Amanda Cristina Gaban & Cunha, Cleyzer Adrian da & Guarnieri, Patricia & Wander, Alcido Elenor, 2023. "Determinant factors of the Rural Warehouse Condominium collective action model," Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural (RESR), Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural, vol. 61(1), January.
    2. Liu, H. & Deng, H. & Xu, Z. & Lu, W., 2018. "Emerging Agricultural Cooperatives and The Structural Change of Crop Production in China," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277324, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    3. Kifle T. Sebhatu & Fatemeh Taheri & Tekeste Berhanu & Miet Maertens & Steven Van Passel & Marijke D'Haese, 2021. "Beyond focus: Exploring variability of service provision of agricultural cooperatives," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 92(2), pages 207-231, June.
    4. Hao, Jinghui & Heerink, Nico & Heijman, Wim & Bijman, Jos, 2017. "Cooperatives Membership And Smallholder Farmers’ Welfare - Evidence From Shaanxi And Shandong Provinces, China," 2017 International Congress, August 28-September 1, 2017, Parma, Italy 260914, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    5. Guyo Godana Dureti & Martin Paul Jr. Tabe‐Ojong & Enoch Owusu‐Sekyere, 2023. "The new normal? Cluster farming and smallholder commercialization in Ethiopia," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 54(6), pages 900-920, November.
    6. Margitta Minah, 2022. "What is the influence of government programs on farmer organizations and their impacts? Evidence from Zambia," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 93(1), pages 29-53, March.
    7. Jos Bijman & Markus Hanisch & Ger Sangen, 2014. "Shifting Control? The Change of Internal Governance in Agricultural Cooperatives in the EU," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 85(4), pages 641-661, December.
    8. Ma, Wanglin & Abdulai, Awudu, 2016. "Does cooperative membership improve household welfare? Evidence from apple farmers in China," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 94-102.
    9. Qiao Liang & Kangwei Ma & Wenhao Liu, 2023. "The role of farmer cooperatives in promoting environmentally sustainable agricultural development in China: A review," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 94(3), pages 741-759, September.
    10. Huma Neupane & Krishna P. Paudel & Mandeep Adhikari & Qinying He, 2022. "Impact of cooperative membership on production efficiency of smallholder goat farmers in Nepal," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 93(2), pages 337-356, June.
    11. Shen, Mingrui & Shen, Jianfa, 2018. "Evaluating the cooperative and family farm programs in China: A rural governance perspective," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 240-250.
    12. Kehinde, Ayodeji Damilola, 2021. "Impact of Credit Access and Cooperative Membership on Cocoa Productivity in Southwestern Nigeria," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315855, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    13. Shyhrete Muriqi & Maria Fekete-Farkas & Zsolt Baranyai, 2019. "Drivers of Cooperation Activity in Kosovo’s Agriculture," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-12, May.
    14. Sultan, Tursinbek & Wolz, Axel, 2012. "Agricultural Cooperative Development in China and Vietnam since Decollectivization: A Multi-Stakeholder Approach," Journal of Rural Cooperation, Hebrew University, Center for Agricultural Economic Research, vol. 40(2), pages 1-21.
    15. Verhofstadt, Ellen & Maertens, Miet, 2013. "Cooperative membership and agricultural performance: Evidence from Rwanda," Working Papers 157389, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Centre for Agricultural and Food Economics.
    16. Schoneveld, George C., 2022. "Transforming food systems through inclusive agribusiness," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    17. Jan Falkowski & Pavel Ciaian, 2016. "Factors Supporting the Development of Producer Organizations and their Impacts in the Light of Ongoing Changes in Food Supply Chains: A Literature Review," JRC Research Reports JRC101617, Joint Research Centre.
    18. Musa Hasen Ahmed & Hiwot Mekonnen Mesfin, 2017. "The impact of agricultural cooperatives membership on the wellbeing of smallholder farmers: empirical evidence from eastern Ethiopia," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 5(1), pages 1-20, December.
    19. Alemu, Abebe Ejigu & Adesina, Jimi, 2015. "Effects of cooperatives and contracts on rural income and production in the dairy supply chains: Evidence from Northern Ethiopia," African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, African Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 10(4), pages 1-16, December.
    20. Blekking, Jordan & Gatti, Nicolas & Waldman, Kurt & Evans, Tom & Baylis, Kathy, 2021. "The benefits and limitations of agricultural input cooperatives in Zambia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:6:y:2022:i:1:p:9-:d:728990. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.