IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlogis/v4y2020i1p3-d316141.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strategic Analysis of the Automation of Container Port Terminals through BOT (Business Observation Tool)

Author

Listed:
  • Alberto Camarero Orive

    (Department of Transport Engineering, Urban and Regional Planning; Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain)

  • José Ignacio Parra Santiago

    (Department of Transport Engineering, Urban and Regional Planning; Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain)

  • María Magdalena Esteban-Infantes Corral

    (Department of Transport Engineering, Urban and Regional Planning; Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain)

  • Nicoletta González-Cancelas

    (Department of Transport Engineering, Urban and Regional Planning; Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

The port system is immersed in a process of digital transformation towards the concept of Ports 4.0, under the new regulatory and connectivity requirements that are expected of them. As a result of the changes that the industrial revolution 4.0 is imposing, based on new information technologies and the change of energy model, the electrification of modes of transport from alternative energies and the total digitalization of the processes is occurring. This conversion to digital, intelligent, and green ports requires the implementation of the new technologies offered by the market. The inclusion of these enabling tools has allowed the development of automated terminals under a functional approach. This article aims to offer the responsible entities a new methodology (BOT) that allows them to successfully undertake the automation of terminals, taking into account the reality of the conditions of the environment in which they are developed. By quantifying the factors that facilitate or impede implementation, it will be possible to determine the strategy to be followed and the necessary measures to be adopted in the project; constituting, therefore, a novel management and planning tool.

Suggested Citation

  • Alberto Camarero Orive & José Ignacio Parra Santiago & María Magdalena Esteban-Infantes Corral & Nicoletta González-Cancelas, 2020. "Strategic Analysis of the Automation of Container Port Terminals through BOT (Business Observation Tool)," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-14, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:4:y:2020:i:1:p:3-:d:316141
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/4/1/3/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/4/1/3/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vis, Iris F. A. & de Koster, Rene, 2003. "Transshipment of containers at a container terminal: An overview," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(1), pages 1-16, May.
    2. Iris, Çağatay & Christensen, Jonas & Pacino, Dario & Ropke, Stefan, 2018. "Flexible ship loading problem with transfer vehicle assignment and scheduling," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 113-134.
    3. Iris, Çağatay & Lam, Jasmine Siu Lee, 2019. "A review of energy efficiency in ports: Operational strategies, technologies and energy management systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 170-182.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Geraldine Knatz & Theo Notteboom & Athanasios A. Pallis, 2022. "Container terminal automation: revealing distinctive terminal characteristics and operating parameters," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 24(3), pages 537-565, September.
    2. Domenico Gattuso & Domenica Savia Pellicanò, 2023. "HUs Fleet Management in an Automated Container Port: Assessment by a Simulation Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-19, July.
    3. Rachid Oucheikh & Tuwe Löfström & Ernst Ahlberg & Lars Carlsson, 2021. "Rolling Cargo Management Using a Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-18, February.
    4. Bokyung Kim & Geunsub Kim & Moohong Kang, 2022. "Study on Comparing the Performance of Fully Automated Container Terminals during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-13, August.
    5. Wang, Nanxi & Wu, Min & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2023. "Assessment of port resilience using Bayesian network: A study of strategies to enhance readiness and response capacities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    6. Li, Kevin X. & Li, Mengchi & Zhu, Yuhan & Yuen, Kum Fai & Tong, Hao & Zhou, Haoqing, 2023. "Smart port: A bibliometric review and future research directions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    7. Alberto Rodrigo González & Nicoletta González-Cancelas & Beatriz Molina Serrano & Alberto Camarero Orive, 2020. "Preparation of a Smart Port Indicator and Calculation of a Ranking for the Spanish Port System," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-22, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Raeesi, Ramin & Sahebjamnia, Navid & Mansouri, S. Afshin, 2023. "The synergistic effect of operational research and big data analytics in greening container terminal operations: A review and future directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(3), pages 943-973.
    2. Domenico Gattuso & Domenica Savia Pellicanò, 2023. "HUs Fleet Management in an Automated Container Port: Assessment by a Simulation Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-19, July.
    3. Yang, Lingyi & Ng, Tsan Sheng & Lee, Loo Hay, 2022. "A robust approximation for yard template optimization under uncertainty," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 21-53.
    4. Charalampos Platias & Dimitris Spyrou, 2023. "EU-Funded Energy-Related Projects for Sustainable Ports: Evidence from the Port of Piraeus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-27, February.
    5. Zhou, Chenhao & Wang, Wencheng & Li, Haobin, 2020. "Container reshuffling considered space allocation problem in container terminals," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    6. Iris, Çağatay & Lam, Jasmine Siu Lee, 2021. "Optimal energy management and operations planning in seaports with smart grid while harnessing renewable energy under uncertainty," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    7. Ursavas, Evrim & Zhu, Stuart X., 2016. "Optimal policies for the berth allocation problem under stochastic nature," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 255(2), pages 380-387.
    8. Briskorn, Dirk & Drexl, Andreas & Hartmann, Sönke, 2005. "Inventory based dispatching of automated guided vehicles on container terminals," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 596, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    9. Bortfeldt, Andreas & Forster, Florian, 2012. "A tree search procedure for the container pre-marshalling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 217(3), pages 531-540.
    10. Mao, Anjia & Yu, Tiantian & Ding, Zhaohao & Fang, Sidun & Guo, Jinran & Sheng, Qianqian, 2022. "Optimal scheduling for seaport integrated energy system considering flexible berth allocation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
    11. Maloni, Michael J. & Jackson, Eric C., 2007. "Stakeholder Contributions to Container Port Capacity: A Survey of Port Authorities," Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, Transportation Research Forum, vol. 46(1).
    12. Jone R. Hansen & Kjetil Fagerholt & Magnus Stålhane & Jørgen G. Rakke, 2020. "An adaptive large neighborhood search heuristic for the planar storage location assignment problem: application to stowage planning for Roll-on Roll-off ships," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 26(6), pages 885-912, December.
    13. Yingyi Huang & Yuliya Mamatok & Chun Jin, 2021. "Decision-making instruments for container seaport sustainable development: management platform and system dynamics model," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 41(2), pages 212-226, June.
    14. Minjeong Sim & Dongjun Suh & Marc-Oliver Otto, 2021. "Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization-Based Decision Support Model for Integrating Renewable Energy Systems in a Korean Campus Building," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-18, August.
    15. J Blazewicz & T C E Cheng & M Machowiak & C Oguz, 2011. "Berth and quay crane allocation: a moldable task scheduling model," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(7), pages 1189-1197, July.
    16. Kumawat, Govind Lal & Roy, Debjit & De Koster, René & Adan, Ivo, 2021. "Stochastic modeling of parallel process flows in intra-logistics systems: Applications in container terminals and compact storage systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(1), pages 159-176.
    17. Hani Alyami & Paul Tae-Woo Lee & Zaili Yang & Ramin Riahi & Stephen Bonsall & Jin Wang, 2014. "An advanced risk analysis approach for container port safety evaluation," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(7), pages 634-650, December.
    18. Tierney, Kevin & Voß, Stefan & Stahlbock, Robert, 2014. "A mathematical model of inter-terminal transportation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 448-460.
    19. Zhongbin Zhao & Xifu Wang & Suxin Cheng & Wei Liu & Lijun Jiang, 2022. "A New Synchronous Handling Technology of Double Stack Container Trains in Sea-Rail Intermodal Terminals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1, September.
    20. Lennart Zey & Dirk Briskorn & Nils Boysen, 2022. "Twin-crane scheduling during seaside workload peaks with a dedicated handshake area," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 3-34, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:4:y:2020:i:1:p:3-:d:316141. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.