IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i8p1127-d869262.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Green and Low-Carbon Commuting Evaluation and Optimization of a Cross-Border Metropolitan Region by the Subway Network: The Case of Shenzhen and Hong Kong, China

Author

Listed:
  • Dening Chen

    (School of Tourism and Geography, Guangdong University of Finance and Economics, Guangzhou 510320, China)

  • Zuxin He

    (School of Economics, Guangdong University of Finance and Economics, Guangzhou 510320, China)

  • Xinyi Hong

    (School of Tourism and Geography, Guangdong University of Finance and Economics, Guangzhou 510320, China)

  • Xinxin Ni

    (Department of International Hotel Management at Qiandaohu, Tourism College of Zhejiang China, Hangzhou 311231, China)

  • Renfeng Ma

    (Department of Geography & Spatial Information Techniques, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China)

Abstract

In the context of the One Country–Two Systems policy, Shenzhen and Hong Kong have rapidly grown into a dual-core international metropolis. However, a huge barrier is the commuting cost incurred by the tariff policy, which blocks the road to the high-quality development of the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area (GBA). Based on traffic accessibility and kernel density analysis of the subway network and points of interest (POIs) of urban functional areas with ArcGIS, this study analyzed the commute time and convenience level of the functional areas in the two separate tariff zones. The traffic (commute) time in 75 min was taken as the turning point of the efficiency of the Shenzhen–Hong Kong connection, and it was found that both the customs clearance time and the accessible areas show the shape of a parabolic function with an upward opening. It was also found that, in Shenzhen and Hong Kong, the commute time in most of the business, commercial, residential, and industrial areas is 60–75 min. In particular, the comfortable range within 45 min was not achieved. It is necessary to further promote the effectiveness of the Shenzhen–Hong Kong customs clearance system and continuously reduce the customs clearance cost so as to promote the integration of Shenzhen and Hong Kong in order to implement the national strategy of “dual circulation” and innovation-driven development and efficiently drive the coordinated construction of the GBA.

Suggested Citation

  • Dening Chen & Zuxin He & Xinyi Hong & Xinxin Ni & Renfeng Ma, 2022. "Green and Low-Carbon Commuting Evaluation and Optimization of a Cross-Border Metropolitan Region by the Subway Network: The Case of Shenzhen and Hong Kong, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-17, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:8:p:1127-:d:869262
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/8/1127/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/8/1127/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. REITEL Bernard & SOHN Christophe & WALTHER Olivier, 2009. "Cross-border metropolitan integration in Europe (Luxembourg, Basel and Geneva)," IRISS Working Paper Series 2009-02, IRISS at CEPS/INSTEAD.
    2. Mark Wiering & Joris Verwijmeren & Kris Lulofs & Christian Feld, 2010. "Experiences in Regional Cross Border Co-operation in River Management. Comparing Three Cases at the Dutch–German Border," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 24(11), pages 2647-2672, September.
    3. Stoffelen, Arie & Ioannides, Dimitri & Vanneste, Dominique, 2017. "Obstacles to achieving cross-border tourism governance: A multi-scalar approach focusing on the German-Czech borderlands," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 126-138.
    4. Simon Duindam & Lisa Waddington, 2012. "Erratum to: Cross-Border cooperation in the Rhine-Meuse region: Aachen (D) and Heerlen (NLs)," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 705-705, June.
    5. Markus Perkmann, 2007. "Construction of New Territorial Scales: A Framework and Case Study of the EUREGIO Cross-border Region," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(2), pages 253-266.
    6. Andrea Noferini & Matteo Berzi & Francesco Camonita & Antoni Durà, 2020. "Cross-border cooperation in the EU: Euroregions amid multilevel governance and re-territorialization," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 35-56, January.
    7. Christophe Sohn & Bernard Reitel & Olivier Walther, 2009. "Cross-Border Metropolitan Integration in Europe: The Case of Luxembourg, Basel, and Geneva," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 27(5), pages 922-939, October.
    8. Antoine Decoville & Frédéric Durand & Christophe Sohn & Olivier Walther, 2013. "Comparing Cross-border Metropolitan Integration in Europe: Towards a Functional Typology," Journal of Borderlands Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(2), pages 221-237, August.
    9. Simon Duindam & Lisa Waddington, 2012. "Cross-Border cooperation in the Rhine-Meuse region: Aachen (D) and Heerlen (NLs)," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 307-320, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fricke, Carola, 2014. "Grenzüberschreitende Governance in der Raumplanung: Organisations- und Kooperationsformen in Basel und Lille," Arbeitsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Grotheer, Swantje & Schwöbel, Arne & Stepper, Martina (ed.), Nimm's sportlich - Planung als Hindernislauf, volume 10, pages 62-78, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    2. SOHN Christophe & REITEL Bernard, 2012. "Le rôle des Etats dans la construction des régions métropolitaines transfrontalières en Europe. Une approche scalaire," LISER Working Paper Series 2012-42, Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER).
    3. Frédéric Durand & Jen Nelles, 2014. "Dossier: Institutions and skilled mobility. Guest Editors: Gery Nijenhuis & Maggi W.H. Leung," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 105(5), pages 573-590, December.
    4. Zhang, Xianchun & Sun, Yi, 2019. "Investigating institutional integration in the contexts of Chinese city-regionalization: Evidence from Shenzhen–Dongguan–Huizhou," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    5. Cavallaro, Federico & Dianin, Alberto, 2019. "Cross-border commuting in Central Europe: features, trends and policies," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 86-104.
    6. Tamara Gutfleisch & Robin Samuel, 2022. "Hiring in border regions: experimental and qualitative evidence from a recruiter survey in Luxembourg," Journal for Labour Market Research, Springer;Institute for Employment Research/ Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), vol. 56(1), pages 1-13, December.
    7. Francis E. Hutchinson, 2021. "In the gateway's shadow: Interactions between Singapore's Hinterlands," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(1), pages 71-87, March.
    8. Sabine Dörry & Olivier J Walther, 2015. "Contested ‘Relational Policy Spaces’ in Two European Border Regions," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 47(2), pages 338-355, February.
    9. DECOVILLE Antoine & DURAND Frédéric & SOHN Christophe & WALTHER Olivier, 2010. "Spatial integration in European cross-border metropolitan regions: A comparative approach," LISER Working Paper Series 2010-40, Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER).
    10. WALTHER Olivier & REITEL Bernard, 2012. "Cross-border policy networks in the trinational region of Basel," LISER Working Paper Series 2012-26, Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER).
    11. John Harrison & Darren P Smith & Chloe Kinton, 2016. "New institutional geographies of higher education: The rise of transregional university alliances," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(5), pages 910-936, May.
    12. Philippe Van Kerm, 2013. "Generalized measures of wage differentials," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 465-482, August.
    13. Amir Hefetz & Mildred E Warner & Eran Vigoda-Gadot, 2012. "Privatization and Intermunicipal Contracting: The US Local Government Experience 1992–2007," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 30(4), pages 675-692, August.
    14. DURAND Frédéric & NELLES Jennifer, 2012. "Cross-border governance within the Eurometropolis Lille-Kortrijk-Tournai (ELKT) through the example of cross-border public transportation," LISER Working Paper Series 2012-16, Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER).
    15. Kristina Zumbusch & Roland Scherer, 2015. "Cross-Border Governance: Balancing Formalized and Less Formalized Co-Operations," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-21, July.
    16. OMRANI Hichem & CHARIF Omar & GERBER Philippe & BÓDIS Katalin & BASSE Reine Maria, 2012. "Simulation of land use changes using cellular automata and artificial neural network," LISER Working Paper Series 2012-01, Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER).
    17. Anna Growe & Mark Baker & Abbas Ziafati Bafarasat, 2020. "The Legitimation of Planning Processes as a Challenge to Metropolitan Governance," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-24, June.
    18. repec:irs:cepswp:12-25 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. John Harrison & Michael Hoyler, 2014. "Governing the new metropolis," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(11), pages 2249-2266, August.
    20. SOHN Christophe, 2012. "La frontière comme ressource dans l'espace urbain globalisé. Une contribution à l'hypothèse de la métropole transfrontalière," LISER Working Paper Series 2012-25, Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER).
    21. Krisztina Varró, 2014. "Spatial Imaginaries of the Dutch–German–Belgian Borderlands: A Multidimensional Analysis of Cross-Border Regional Governance," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(6), pages 2235-2255, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:8:p:1127-:d:869262. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.