IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i4p493-d781976.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Borrowing Size and Urban Green Development Efficiency in the City Network of China: Impact Measures and Size Thresholds

Author

Listed:
  • Aijun Guo

    (School of Economics, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China)

  • Peixian Liu

    (School of Economics, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China)

  • Fanglei Zhong

    (School of Economics, Minzu University of China, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Chunlin Yang

    (School of Economics, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China)

  • Xijing Luo

    (School of Economics, Minzu University of China, Beijing 100081, China)

Abstract

Cities enhance the efficiency of green development among themselves through their borrowing population, economic activities density and advanced functions, but the positive green effect of the borrowing size is affected by the city size. Using panel data of 280 prefecture-level cities in China for the period 2009–2019, this paper measures the borrowing size in three dimensions, namely the borrowing population size, borrowing economic activity density and borrowing advanced functions, and uses the super efficiency slacks-based measure (SBM) model, including non-desired outputs, to measure the urban green development efficiency. After that, this paper empirically examines the effect of the borrowing size on the urban green development efficiency in the Chinese urban network using a double-fixed-effect model. A panel threshold regression with city size as the threshold variable is conducted to evaluate the nonlinear relationship quantitatively between the borrowing size and urban green development efficiency. The results show that all three dimensions of the borrowing size have positive effects on the urban green development efficiency. There is a significant double-threshold effect between the borrowing size and urban green development efficiency; under the threshold of the city size, there is a U-shaped relationship between the borrowing population size, borrowing advanced functions and urban green development efficiency, whereas there is an inverted U-shaped relationship between the borrowing economic activity density and urban green development efficiency. Accordingly, this paper argues that government should pay attention to the role of the borrowing size in promoting urban green development efficiency and reasonably expand the city size.

Suggested Citation

  • Aijun Guo & Peixian Liu & Fanglei Zhong & Chunlin Yang & Xijing Luo, 2022. "Borrowing Size and Urban Green Development Efficiency in the City Network of China: Impact Measures and Size Thresholds," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-19, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:4:p:493-:d:781976
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/4/493/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/4/493/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lewis Dijkstra & Enrique Garcilazo & Philip McCann, 2013. "The Economic Performance of European Cities and City Regions: Myths and Realities," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(3), pages 334-354, March.
    2. Pierre-Philippe Combes & Gilles Duranton & Laurent Gobillon & Sébastien Roux, 2010. "Estimating Agglomeration Economies with History, Geology, and Worker Effects," NBER Chapters, in: Agglomeration Economics, pages 15-66, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Giulia Faggio & Olmo Silva & William C. Strange, 2017. "Heterogeneous Agglomeration," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 99(1), pages 80-94, March.
    4. Xiaoxia Gong & Fanglei Zhong, 2021. "The Impact of Borrowing Size on the Economic Development of Small and Medium-Sized Cities in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-18, January.
    5. Elisa Giuliani, 2007. "The selective nature of knowledge networks in clusters: evidence from the wine industry," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 7(2), pages 139-168, March.
    6. Evert Meijers & Martijn Burger & Evert J. Meijers & Martijn J. Burger & Marloes M. Hoogerbrugge, 2016. "Borrowing size in networks of cities: City size, network connectivity and metropolitan functions in Europe," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 95(1), pages 181-198, March.
    7. Banerjee, Abhijit & Duflo, Esther & Qian, Nancy, 2020. "On the road: Access to transportation infrastructure and economic growth in China," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    8. Yu, Binbin, 2021. "Ecological effects of new-type urbanization in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    9. Börje Johansson & John M. Quigley, 2004. "Agglomeration and networks in spatial economies," Advances in Spatial Science, in: Raymond J. G. M. Florax & David A. Plane (ed.), Fifty Years of Regional Science, pages 165-176, Springer.
    10. Roberto Camagni & Roberta Capello & Andrea Caragliu, 2015. "The Rise of Second-Rank Cities: What Role for Agglomeration Economies?," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(6), pages 1069-1089, June.
    11. Hansen, Bruce E., 1999. "Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: Estimation, testing, and inference," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 93(2), pages 345-368, December.
    12. Henderson, Vernon & Becker, Randy, 2000. "Political Economy of City Sizes and Formation," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 453-484, November.
    13. Katz, Michael L & Shapiro, Carl, 1985. "Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 75(3), pages 424-440, June.
    14. Roberta Capello, 2000. "The City Network Paradigm: Measuring Urban Network Externalities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 37(11), pages 1925-1945, October.
    15. Martijn J. Burger & Evert J. Meijers & Marloes M. Hoogerbrugge & Jaume Masip Tresserra, 2015. "Borrowed Size, Agglomeration Shadows and Cultural Amenities in North-West Europe," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(6), pages 1090-1109, June.
    16. Rafael Boix & Joan Trullén, 2007. "Knowledge, networks of cities and growth in regional urban systems," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 86(4), pages 551-574, November.
    17. Hu, Wei & Fan, Yuemin, 2020. "City size and energy conservation: Do large cities in China consume more energy?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    18. Evert Meijers & Martijn Burger & Martijn J. Burger & Evert J. Meijers, 2016. "Agglomerations and the rise of urban network externalities," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 95(1), pages 5-15, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kangwen Zhu & Dan Song & Lanxin Zhang & Yong He & Sheng Zhang & Yaqun Liu & Xiaosong Tian, 2023. "Evolving Trends and Influencing Factors of the Rural Green Development Level in Chongqing," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-17, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaoxia Gong & Fanglei Zhong, 2021. "The Impact of Borrowing Size on the Economic Development of Small and Medium-Sized Cities in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-18, January.
    2. Wenfang Fu & Chuanjian Luo & Modan Yan, 2023. "Does Urban Agglomeration Promote the Development of Cities? Evidence from the Urban Network Externalities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-20, June.
    3. Tian, Meng & Wang, Yiwei & Wang, Yiran, 2023. "High-speed rail network and urban agglomeration economies: Research from the perspective of urban network externalities," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    4. Evert Meijers & Martijn Burger & Martijn J. Burger & Evert J. Meijers, 2016. "Agglomerations and the rise of urban network externalities," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 95(1), pages 5-15, March.
    5. Jinliang Jiang & Zhensheng Xu & Jiayi Lu & Dongqi Sun, 2022. "Does Network Externality of Urban Agglomeration Benefit Urban Economic Growth—A Case Study of the Yangtze River Delta," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-19, April.
    6. Evert Meijers & Martijn Burger & Roberto Camagni & Roberta Capello & Andrea Caragliu, 2016. "Static vs. dynamic agglomeration economies. Spatial context and structural evolution behind urban growth," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 95(1), pages 133-158, March.
    7. Yang, Xiaolan & Wang, Rui & Guo, Dongmei & Sun, Weizeng, 2020. "The reconfiguration effect of China's high-speed railway on intercity connection ——A study based on media attention index," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 47-56.
    8. Christophe Sohn & Julien Licheron & Evert Meijers, 2022. "Border cities: Out of the shadow," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 101(2), pages 417-438, April.
    9. Akihiro Otsuka, 2021. "A new approach to inter‐regional network externalities in Japan," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(3), pages 1051-1067, June.
    10. Wenfang Fu & Chuanjian Luo & Shan He, 2022. "Does Urban Agglomeration Promote the Development of Cities? An Empirical Analysis Based on Spatial Econometrics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-23, November.
    11. Evert Meijers & Martijn Burger & Evert J. Meijers & Martijn J. Burger & Marloes M. Hoogerbrugge, 2016. "Borrowing size in networks of cities: City size, network connectivity and metropolitan functions in Europe," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 95(1), pages 181-198, March.
    12. Shuai Shi & Kathy Pain, 2020. "Investigating China’s Mid-Yangtze River economic growth region using a spatial network growth model," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(14), pages 2973-2993, November.
    13. Peixin Li & Chen Wang & Xueliang Zhang, 2017. "Did city cluster development help improve labor productivity in China?," Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 122-135, January.
    14. Evert Meijers & Martijn Burger & Edward L. Glaeser & Giacomo A. M. Ponzetto & Yimei Zou, 2016. "Urban networks: Connecting markets, people, and ideas," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 95(1), pages 17-59, March.
    15. Liang Wang & Fangfang Zhang & Yuzhu Zang & Jian Duan, 2022. "Understanding the Regional Integration Process from the Perspective of Agglomeration and Urban Networks: Case Study in Central China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-15, October.
    16. Evert Meijers & Martijn Burger & Michiel Meeteren & Zachary Neal & Ben Derudder, 2016. "Disentangling agglomeration and network externalities: A conceptual typology," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 95(1), pages 61-80, March.
    17. Yunlong Gong & Jan de Haan & Peter Boelhouwer, 2020. "Cross‐city spillovers in Chinese housing markets: From a city network perspective," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 99(4), pages 1065-1085, August.
    18. Qin, Xionghe & Wang, Xueli & Kwan, Mei-Po, 2023. "The contrasting effects of interregional networks and local agglomeration on R&D productivity in Chinese provinces: Insights from an empirical spatial Durbin model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    19. Hongming Zhang & Tieshan Sun & Yuanxi Li, 2022. "Network capital and economic growth of major urban agglomeration regions in China," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(S2), pages 60-75, November.
    20. Jorge Díaz-Lanchas & Peter Mulder, 2021. "Does decentralization of governance promote urban diversity? Evidence from Spain," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(6), pages 1111-1128, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:4:p:493-:d:781976. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.