IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v10y2021i11p1118-d662073.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Expansion of Industrial Parks in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Urban Agglomeration: A Spatial Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Lei Kang

    (Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Beijing 100101, China)

  • Li Ma

    (Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Beijing 100101, China
    College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

Abstract

Today, China is witnessing large-scale expansion of industrial parks. Rapid urbanization has resulted in the planning, development, and functional transformation of large industrial parks. Some of the expansions have occurred in core areas, while others involved the establishment of new park spaces in peripheral areas. This study examines industrial parks’ spatial expansion in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei urban agglomeration and supplements the currently limited spatial expansion analyses of groups of development zones within specific regions. From the perspective of land use change, the study characterizes the spatial expansion of industrial parks in the three periods 1990–2000, 2000–2010, and 2010–2015. Results reveal the following: (1) During the three periods, the footprint of major industrial parks in Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei increased continuously, whereas the average annual growth rates diminished by 11.51%, 8.17%, and 3.38% for 1990–2000, 2000–2010, and 2010–2015, respectively. (2) In terms of spatial layout, the density of industrial parks has always been high in Beijing and Tianjin, and it increased over the three periods in Hebei, with more industrial parks established in the southeastern and fewer in the northern regions. (3) Regarding expansion modes, the period 1990–2000 witnessed several edge-expansions in core areas, such as Beijing and Tianjin, and limited expansions in peripheral cities; in 2000–2010, mainly edge- and infilling expansions occurred in core cities and characteristically outlying expansions in peripheral ones. In 2010–2015, infilling expansions took place in core cities and edge-expansions of established industrial parks occurred in small and medium-sized cities. Identifying the expansion modes is instrumental in differentiating industrial park development paths and optimizing an entire region’s spatial planning for industrial parks.

Suggested Citation

  • Lei Kang & Li Ma, 2021. "Expansion of Industrial Parks in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Urban Agglomeration: A Spatial Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-18, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:11:p:1118-:d:662073
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/11/1118/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/11/1118/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Angang Hu & Shenglong Liu, 2010. "Transportation, economic growth and spillover effects: The conclusion based on the spatial econometric model," Frontiers of Economics in China, Springer;Higher Education Press, vol. 5(2), pages 169-186, June.
    2. Zhu, Xinhua & Li, Yan & Zhang, Peifeng & Wei, Yigang & Zheng, Xuyang & Xie, Lingling, 2019. "Temporal–spatial characteristics of urban land use efficiency of China’s 35mega cities based on DEA: Decomposing technology and scale efficiency," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    3. Zhuang, Liang & Ye, Chao, 2020. "Changing imbalance: Spatial production of national high-tech industrial development zones in China (1988-2018)," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    4. Angang Hu & Shenglong Liu, 2010. "Transportation, Economic Growth and Spillover Effects: The Conclusion Based on the Spatial Econometric Model," Frontiers of Economics in China-Selected Publications from Chinese Universities, Higher Education Press, vol. 5(2), pages 169-186, June.
    5. Jenkins, Mauricio, 2006. "Sourcing patterns of firms in Export Processing Zones (EPZs): An empirical analysis of firm-level determinants," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(3), pages 331-334, March.
    6. Zeng,Zhihua, 2015. "Global experiences with special economic zones : focus on China and Africa," Policy Research Working Paper Series 7240, The World Bank.
    7. Ray Thomas, 1994. "Book Review: New Town, Home Town," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 31(1), pages 167-168, February.
    8. Liu, Yansui, 2018. "Introduction to land use and rural sustainability in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 1-4.
    9. Wei-Ju Huang & Ana María Fernández-Maldonado, 2016. "High-tech development and spatial planning: comparing the Netherlands and Taiwan from an institutional perspective," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(9), pages 1662-1683, September.
    10. Simon Alder & Lin Shao & Fabrizio Zilibotti, 2016. "Economic reforms and industrial policy in a panel of Chinese cities," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 305-349, December.
    11. Glen Weisbrod, 2008. "Models to predict the economic development impact of transportation projects: historical experience and new applications," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 42(3), pages 519-543, September.
    12. Cling, Jean-Pierre & Razafindrakoto, Mireille & Roubaud, Francois, 2005. "Export processing zones in Madagascar: a success story under threat?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 785-803, May.
    13. Sargent, John & Matthews, Linda, 2004. "What Happens When Relative Costs Increase in Export Processing Zones? Technology, Regional Production Networks, and Mexico's Maquiladoras," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 32(12), pages 2015-2030, December.
    14. Zhigao Liu & Jiayi Zhang & Oleg Golubchikov, 2019. "Edge-Urbanization: Land Policy, Development Zones, and Urban Expansion in Tianjin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-16, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liangen Zeng & Haitao Li & Xiao Wang & Zhao Yu & Haoyu Hu & Xinyue Yuan & Xuhai Zhao & Chengming Li & Dandan Yuan & Yukun Gao & Yang Nie & Liangzhen Huang, 2022. "China’s Transport Land: Spatiotemporal Expansion Characteristics and Driving Mechanism," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, July.
    2. Yao Shen & Xu Zhang & Hongfei Zhu & Zicheng Yin & Riela Provi Drianda, 2023. "Living in a Chinese Industrial New Town: A Case Study of Chenglingji New Port Area," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-19, March.
    3. Lu Zhang & Xuehan Lin & Bingkui Qiu & Maomao Zhang & Qingsong He, 2022. "The Industrial Sprawl in China from 2010 to 2019: A Multi-Level Spatial Analysis Based on Urban Scaling Law," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-14, December.
    4. Zhenshan Yang & Shuying Zhang & Jiaming Liu & Huijuan Sun, 2022. "Network of Tourism–Industrial Complex in Cities: Typologies and Implications through a Critical Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-16, April.
    5. Soniya Falahatdoost & Xingping Wang, 2022. "Industrial Park Role as a Catalyst for Regional Development: Zooming on Middle East Countries," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sun, Yifan & Ma, Anbing & Su, Haorui & Su, Shiliang & Chen, Fei & Wang, Wen & Weng, Min, 2020. "Does the establishment of development zones really improve industrial land use efficiency? Implications for China’s high-quality development policy," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    2. Zhang, Pengyan & Yang, Dan & Qin, Mingzhou & Jing, Wenlong, 2020. "Spatial heterogeneity analysis and driving forces exploring of built-up land development intensity in Chinese prefecture-level cities and implications for future Urban Land intensive use," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    3. Sargent, John & Matthews, Linda, 2009. "China versus Mexico in the Global EPZ Industry: Maquiladoras, FDI Quality, and Plant Mortality," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 1069-1082, June.
    4. Malin Song & Weiliang Tao, 2022. "Coupling and coordination analysis of China's regional urban‐rural integration and land‐use efficiency," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(3), pages 1384-1413, September.
    5. Marta Castilho & Marta Menéndez & Aude A. Sztulman, 2015. "Poverty and Inequality Dynamics in Manaus: Legacy of a Free Trade Zone?," Working Papers halshs-01245394, HAL.
    6. Ronald B. Davies, T. Huw Edwards, and Arman Mazhikeyev, 2018. "The Impact of Special Economic Zones on Electricity Intensity of Firms," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Special I).
    7. Ya Lin & Quanwu Zhao & Peisen Liu & Qinhong Zhang, 2020. "Do Transportation Infrastructure Investments Reduce Inventory Levels in the Manufacturing Sector in China?," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 43(4), pages 397-420, July.
    8. Olga A. Sinenko, 2016. "Methods of assessing of tax incentives effectiveness in special economic zones: An analytical overview," Journal of Tax Reform, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University, vol. 2(3), pages 168-178.
    9. Tong, Tingting & Yu, T. Edward, 2018. "Transportation and economic growth in China: A heterogeneous panel cointegration and causality analysis," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 120-130.
    10. Konno, Akio & Kato, Hironori & Takeuchi, Wataru & Kiguchi, Riku, 2021. "Global evidence on productivity effects of road infrastructure incorporating spatial spillover effects," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 167-182.
    11. Elena Cigu & Daniela Tatiana Agheorghiesei & Anca Florentina Gavriluță (Vatamanu) & Elena Toader, 2018. "Transport Infrastructure Development, Public Performance and Long-Run Economic Growth: A Case Study for the Eu-28 Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-22, December.
    12. Nawaz, Saima & Mangla, Inayat Ullah, 2021. "The economic geography of infrastructure in Asia: The role of institutions and regional integration," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    13. Mengchao Yao & Yihua Zhang, 2021. "Evaluation and Optimization of Urban Land-Use Efficiency: A Case Study in Sichuan Province of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-22, February.
    14. Zhuang, Liang & Ye, Chao, 2020. "Changing imbalance: Spatial production of national high-tech industrial development zones in China (1988-2018)," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    15. Qixuan Wang & Jie Ren & Simin Yan & Zhan Cao & Yao Cheng, 2023. "Do the High-Tech Industrial Development Zones Foster Urban Innovation? A Case Study of China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-18, April.
    16. Sinem Kilic Celik & M. Ayhan Kose & Franziska Ohnsorge, 2023. "Potential Growth Prospects: Risks, Rewards and Policies," CAMA Working Papers 2023-19, Centre for Applied Macroeconomic Analysis, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
    17. Ming Ma & Yuge Liu & Bingyi Wang & Xinyu Yan & Haotian Li, 2023. "Spatial-Temporal Evolution and Driving Mechanism of Urban Land Use Efficiency Based on T-DEA Model: A Case Study of Anhui Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-21, June.
    18. Jieping Chen & Xianpeng Long & Shanlang Lin, 2022. "Special Economic Zone, Carbon Emissions and the Mechanism Role of Green Technology Vertical Spillover: Evidence from Chinese Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-22, September.
    19. Ştefan Cristian Gherghina & Mihaela Onofrei & Georgeta Vintilă & Daniel Ştefan Armeanu, 2018. "Empirical Evidence from EU-28 Countries on Resilient Transport Infrastructure Systems and Sustainable Economic Growth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-34, August.
    20. Hosein Mohammadi & Samira Shayanmehr & Juan D. Borrero, 2022. "Does Freedom Matter for Sustainable Economic Development? New Evidence from Spatial Econometric Analysis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:11:p:1118-:d:662073. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.