IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v14y2021i9p422-d628924.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Determinants of PayTech’s Success in the Mobile Payment Market—The Case of BLIK

Author

Listed:
  • Joanna Błach

    (Department of Corporate Finance and Insurance, Faculty of Finance, University of Economics in Katowice, ul. 1 Maja 50, 40-287 Katowice, Poland)

  • Monika Klimontowicz

    (Department of Banking and Financial Markets, Faculty of Finance, University of Economics in Katowice, ul. 1 Maja 50, 40-287 Katowice, Poland)

Abstract

FinTech and its interaction with banking is widely discussed today as a new phenomenon notwithstanding the relationship between technology and financial services is not a new topic. Most of the research focuses on innovations and determinants of their adoptions including among other innovations in the payment system. The studies dedicated directly to PayTechs as a special kind of a FinTech entity and its market activity are a relatively new field of research. This paper aims to fill this gap. The multidimensional character of this exploratory research causes the necessity to apply various research methods, including both inductive and deductive methods, together with comparative analysis. The theoretical analysis conducted in the paper for defining PayTechs from the perspective of business model and market behavior was based on an in-depth literature review. In this section, the inductive method and comparative analysis were mostly applied. The empirical part of the paper includes the analysis of quantitative data published by the National Bank of Poland (NBP), Central Statistical Office (GUS), and Bank for International Settlements (BIS). The subject of the case is the Polish Payment Standard referred to as BLIK implemented in Poland in 2015 for mobile payments. The BLIK diffusion is measured by the number of entrants and acceptants as well as the scope of transactions while the adoption by the number of customers using BLIK in everyday transactions. The results present the market behavior of BLIK as an open business model and the key success factors of BLIK adoption and diffusion and the determinants for further open payment innovations’ development. The newly developed definition of PayTechs, the identification of the major components of the PayTech open business model, as well as the indication of the key success factors of adoption and diffusion of m-payments, constitute the original contribution of the paper.

Suggested Citation

  • Joanna Błach & Monika Klimontowicz, 2021. "The Determinants of PayTech’s Success in the Mobile Payment Market—The Case of BLIK," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-23, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:14:y:2021:i:9:p:422-:d:628924
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/14/9/422/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/14/9/422/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Benjamin C. Esty, 2001. "Structuring Loan Syndicates: A Case Study Of The Hong Kong Disneyland Project Loan," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 14(3), pages 80-95, September.
    2. Mario La Torre & Annarita Trotta & Helen Chiappini & Alessandro Rizzello, 2019. "Business Models for Sustainable Finance: The Case Study of Social Impact Bonds," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-23, March.
    3. Marvello Yang & Abdullah Al Mamun & Muhammad Mohiuddin & Noorshella Che Nawi & Noor Raihani Zainol, 2021. "Cashless Transactions: A Study on Intention and Adoption of e-Wallets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-18, January.
    4. Peter Gomber & Jascha-Alexander Koch & Michael Siering, 2017. "Digital Finance and FinTech: current research and future research directions," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 87(5), pages 537-580, July.
    5. Vives, Xavier, 2019. "Competition and stability in modern banking: A post-crisis perspective," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 55-69.
    6. Polasik, Michał & Huterska, Agnieszka & Iftikhar, Rehan & Mikula, Štěpán, 2020. "The impact of Payment Services Directive 2 on the PayTech sector development in Europe," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 385-401.
    7. Lee, In & Shin, Yong Jae, 2018. "Fintech: Ecosystem, business models, investment decisions, and challenges," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 61(1), pages 35-46.
    8. Ion MICU & Alexandra MICU, 2016. "Financial Technology (Fintech) And Its Implementation On The Romanian Non-Banking Capital Market," SEA - Practical Application of Science, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 11, pages 379-384, July.
    9. Agata Kliber & Barbara Będowska-Sójka & Aleksandra Rutkowska & Katarzyna Świerczyńska, 2021. "Triggers and Obstacles to the Development of the FinTech Sector in Poland," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-27, February.
    10. Maarten H. Batterink & Emiel F.M. Wubben & Laurens Klerkx & S.W.F. (Onno) Omta, 2010. "Orchestrating innovation networks: The case of innovation brokers in the agri-food sector," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 47-76, January.
    11. Svetlana Saksonova & Irina Kuzmina-Merlino, 2017. "Fintech as Financial Innovation - The Possibilities and Problems of Implementation," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3A), pages 961-973.
    12. Abhipsa Pal & Tejaswini Herath & Rahul De’ & H. Raghav Rao, 2021. "Is the Convenience Worth the Risk? An Investigation of Mobile Payment Usage," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 941-961, August.
    13. Drasch, Benedict J. & Schweizer, André & Urbach, Nils, 2018. "Integrating the ‘Troublemakers’: A taxonomy for cooperation between banks and fintechs," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 26-42.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daniel Mider & Przemyslaw Potocki & Robert Staniszewski, 2023. "Cryptocurrencies and Other Forms of Payment in the Awareness of Poles: Declared Trust, Perceived Risk and Actual Victimization," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 480-491.
    2. Mirosława Kaczmarek, 2023. "Przynależność do kohorty pokoleniowej jako determinanta korzystania z BLIK-a," Bank i Kredyt, Narodowy Bank Polski, vol. 54(2), pages 221-238.
    3. Yuying Gao & Shanyue Jin, 2022. "Corporate Nature, Financial Technology, and Corporate Innovation in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-22, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Polasik, Michał & Huterska, Agnieszka & Iftikhar, Rehan & Mikula, Štěpán, 2020. "The impact of Payment Services Directive 2 on the PayTech sector development in Europe," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 385-401.
    2. Mustafa Raza Rabbani & Shahnawaz Khan & Eleftherios I. Thalassinos, 2020. "FinTech, Blockchain and Islamic Finance: An Extensive Literature Review," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(2), pages 65-86.
    3. Lai, Xiaobing & Yue, Shujing & Guo, Chong & Zhang, Xinhe, 2023. "Does FinTech reduce corporate excess leverage? Evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 281-299.
    4. Fasano, Francesco & Cappa, Francesco, 2022. "How do banking fintech services affect SME debt?," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    5. Massimo Preziuso & Franziska Koefer & Michel Ehrenhard, 2023. "Open banking and inclusive finance in the European Union: perspectives from the Dutch stakeholder ecosystem," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 9(1), pages 1-27, December.
    6. Sánchez, Marisa A., 2022. "A multi-level perspective on financial technology transitions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    7. Ishtiaq Ahmad Bajwa & Shafiq Ur Rehman & Abid Iqbal & Zaheer Anwer & Murtaza Ashiq & Muhammad Ajmal Khan, 2022. "Past, Present and Future of FinTech Research: A Bibliometric Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, October.
    8. Merello, Paloma & Barberá, Antonio & la Poza, Elena De, 2022. "Is the sustainability profile of FinTech companies a key driver of their value?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    9. Xia, Yanchun & Qiao, Zhilin & Xie, Guanghua, 2022. "Corporate resilience to the COVID-19 pandemic: The role of digital finance," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    10. Wang, Xiaoting & Hou, Siyuan & Kyaw, Khine & Xue, Xupeng & Liu, Xueqin, 2023. "Exploring the determinants of Fintech Credit: A comprehensive analysis," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    11. Salma Rhanoui, 2022. "Banking Goes Digital: The Main Determinants of the Clients Satisfaction and Trust toward Fintech-Based Services," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 12(5), pages 10-20, September.
    12. Hiranya Dissanayake & Catalin Popescu & Anuradha Iddagoda, 2023. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Financial Technology: Unveiling the Research Landscape," FinTech, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-16, August.
    13. Małgorzata Hałasik-Kozajda & Martyna Olbryś, 2020. "Analiza ewolucji i struktury sektora fintech," Bank i Kredyt, Narodowy Bank Polski, vol. 51(5), pages 549-586.
    14. Cao, Ting & Cook, Wade D. & Kristal, M. Murat, 2022. "Has the technological investment been worth it? Assessing the aggregate efficiency of non-homogeneous bank holding companies in the digital age," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    15. Santiago Carbó Valverde & Pedro J. Cuadros Solas & Francisco Rodríguez Fernández, 2020. "Taxonomy of the Spanish FinTech ecosystem and the drivers of FinTechs’ performance," Financial Stability Review, Banco de España, issue Spring.
    16. Kimani, Danson & Adams, Kweku & Attah-Boakye, Rexford & Ullah, Subhan & Frecknall-Hughes, Jane & Kim, Ja, 2020. "Blockchain, business and the fourth industrial revolution: Whence, whither, wherefore and how?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    17. Khan, Muhammad Zubair & Khan, Zafir Ullah & Hameed, Affan & Zada, Shehnaz Sahib, 2021. "On the upside or flipside: Where is venture capital positioned in the era of digital disruptions?," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    18. Yingying Zhang-Zhang & Sylvia Rohlfer & Jay Rajasekera, 2020. "An Eco-Systematic View of Cross-Sector Fintech: The Case of Alibaba and Tencent," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-25, October.
    19. Santiago Carbó Valverde & Pedro J. Cuadros Solas & Francisco Rodríguez Fernández, 2020. "Taxonomy of the Spanish FinTech ecosystem and the drivers of FinTechs’ performance," Revista de Estabilidad Financiera, Banco de España, issue MAY.
    20. Salerno, Dario & Sampagnaro, Gabriele & Verdoliva, Vincenzo, 2022. "Fintech and IPO underpricing: An explorative study," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:14:y:2021:i:9:p:422-:d:628924. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.