IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v9y2012i4p1111-1134d16904.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Success Counteracting Tobacco Company Interference in Thailand: An Example of FCTC Implementation for Low- and Middle-income Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Naowarut Charoenca

    (Faculty of Public Health, Mahidol University, 420/1 Rajvithi Road, Ratchathewi, Bangkok 10400, Thailand)

  • Jeremiah Mock

    (Center for the Study of Communication-Design, Osaka University, 2-1 Yamada Oka, Osaka 565-0871, Japan)

  • Nipapun Kungskulniti

    (Faculty of Public Health, Mahidol University, 420/1 Rajvithi Road, Ratchathewi, Bangkok 10400, Thailand)

  • Sunida Preechawong

    (Faculty of Nursing, Chulalongkorn University, Boromarajonani Srisatapat Building, Floor 11, Rama 1 Road, Pathumwan, Bangkok 10330, Thailand)

  • Nicholas Kojetin

    (Human Development and Family Studies, Indiana University, 107 South Indianan Avenue, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA)

  • Stephen L. Hamann

    (Tobacco Control Research and Knowledge Management Center, Mahidol University, 420/1 Rajvithi Road, Ratchathewi, Bangkok 10400, Thailand)

Abstract

Transnational tobacco companies (TTCs) interfere regularly in policymaking in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The WHO Framework Convention for Tobacco Control provides mechanisms and guidance for dealing with TTC interference, but many countries still face ‘how to’ challenges of implementation. For more than two decades, Thailand’s public health community has been developing a system for identifying and counteracting strategies TTCs use to derail, delay and undermine tobacco control policymaking. Consequently, Thailand has already implemented most of the FCTC guidelines for counteracting TTC interference. In this study, our aims are to describe strategies TTCs have used in Thailand to interfere in policymaking, and to examine how the public health community in Thailand has counteracted TTC interference. We analyzed information reported by three groups with a stake in tobacco control policies: Thai tobacco control advocates, TTCs, and international tobacco control experts. To identify TTC viewpoints and strategies, we also extracted information from internal tobacco industry documents. We synthesized these data and identified six core strategies TTCs use to interfere in tobacco control policymaking: (1) doing business with ‘two faces’, (2) seeking to influence people in high places, (3) ‘buying’ advocates in grassroots organizations, (4) putting up a deceptive front, (5) intimidation, and (6) undermining controls on tobacco advertising, promotion and sponsorship. We present three case examples showing where TTCs have employed multiple interference strategies simultaneously, and showing how Thai tobacco control advocates have successfully counteracted those strategies by: (1) conducting vigilant surveillance, (2) excluding tobacco companies from policymaking, (3) restricting tobacco company sales, (4) sustaining pressure, and (5) dedicating resources to the effective enforcement of regulations. Policy implications from this study are that tobacco control advocates in LMICs may be able to develop countermeasures similar to those we identified in Thailand based on FCTC guidelines to limit TTC interference.

Suggested Citation

  • Naowarut Charoenca & Jeremiah Mock & Nipapun Kungskulniti & Sunida Preechawong & Nicholas Kojetin & Stephen L. Hamann, 2012. "Success Counteracting Tobacco Company Interference in Thailand: An Example of FCTC Implementation for Low- and Middle-income Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-24, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:9:y:2012:i:4:p:1111-1134:d:16904
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/9/4/1111/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/9/4/1111/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roemer, R. & Taylor, A. & Lariviere, J., 2005. "Origins of the WHO framework convention on tobacco control," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 95(6), pages 936-938.
    2. Stebbins, Kenyon Rainier, 1990. "Transnational tobacco companies and health in underdeveloped countries: Recommendations for avoiding a smoking epidemic," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 227-235, January.
    3. Mamudu, H.M. & Gonzalez, M.E. & Glantz, S., 2011. "The nature, scope, and development of the global tobacco control epistemic community," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 101(11), pages 2044-2054.
    4. Landman, A. & Glantz, S.A., 2009. "Tobacco industry efforts to undermine policy-relevant research," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 99(1), pages 45-58.
    5. Tsoukalas, T H & Glantz, Stanton A. Ph.D., 2003. "Development and destruction of the first state funded anti-smoking campaign in the USA," University of California at San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education qt9zm5s3n6, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco.
    6. Wipfli, H.L. & Fujimoto, K. & Valente, T.W., 2010. "Global tobacco control diffusion: The case of the framework convention on tobacco control," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 100(7), pages 1260-1266.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Judith McCool & Jeanie McKenzie & Annabel Lyman & Matthew Allen, 2013. "Supporting Pacific Island Countries to Strengthen Their Resistance to Tobacco Industry Interference in Tobacco Control: A Case Study of Papua New Guinea and Solomon Islands," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-11, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Valente, Thomas W. & Pitts, Stephanie & Wipfli, Heather & Vega Yon, George G., 2019. "Network influences on policy implementation: Evidence from a global health treaty," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 188-197.
    2. Mamudu, Hadii M. & Hammond, Ross & Glantz, Stanton, 2008. "Tobacco industry attempts to counter the World Bank report curbing the epidemic and obstruct the WHO framework convention on tobacco control," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(11), pages 1690-1699, December.
    3. Hermann Pythagore Pierre Donfouet & Shukri F. Mohamed & Eric Malin, 2021. "Socioeconomic inequality in tobacco use in Kenya: a concentration analysis," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 247-269, June.
    4. Valente, Thomas W. & Dyal, Stephanie R. & Chu, Kar-Hai & Wipfli, Heather & Fujimoto, Kayo, 2015. "Diffusion of innovations theory applied to global tobacco control treaty ratification," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 89-97.
    5. Emily Savell & Anna B Gilmore & Gary Fooks, 2014. "How Does the Tobacco Industry Attempt to Influence Marketing Regulations? A Systematic Review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(2), pages 1-10, February.
    6. Hadii M. Mamudu & Pooja Subedi & Ali E. Alamin & Sreenivas P. Veeranki & Daniel Owusu & Amy Poole & Lazarous Mbulo & A.E. Ogwell Ouma & Adekunle Oke, 2018. "The Progress of Tobacco Control Research in Sub-Saharan Africa in the Past 50 Years: A Systematic Review of the Design and Methods of the Studies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-15, December.
    7. Amira Osman & Sarah D. Kowitt & Paschal Sheeran & Kristen L. Jarman & Leah M. Ranney & Adam O. Goldstein, 2018. "Information to Improve Public Perceptions of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA’s) Tobacco Regulatory Role," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-13, April.
    8. Hiilamo, Heikki & Glantz, Stanton A., 2015. "Implementation of effective cigarette health warning labels among low and middle income countries: State capacity, path-dependency and tobacco industry activity," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 241-245.
    9. José Ignacio Nazif-Munoz & Amélie Quesnel-Vallée & Axel Berg, 2021. "Global diffusion of three road safety policies, 1964–2015," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-11, December.
    10. Abigail B. Brown & Jacob Alex Klerman, 2012. "Independent Evaluation," Evaluation Review, , vol. 36(3), pages 186-219, June.
    11. George Weisz & Etienne Vignola-Gagné, 2015. "The World Health Organization and the Globalization of Chronic Noncommunicable Disease," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 41(3), pages 507-532, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:9:y:2012:i:4:p:1111-1134:d:16904. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.