IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/10.2105-ajph.2009.167833_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Global tobacco control diffusion: The case of the framework convention on tobacco control

Author

Listed:
  • Wipfli, H.L.
  • Fujimoto, K.
  • Valente, T.W.

Abstract

Objectives. We analyzed demographic and social network variables associated with the timing of ratification of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC). Methods. We compiled a 2-mode data set that recorded country participation in FCTC negotiations, as well as the number of individuals per country per year who joined an online tobacco control network. We used logistic regression analysis of these 2 data sets along with geographic location to determine whether exposure to prior FCTC adoptions was associated with a country's likelihood of adoption. Results. In the logistic regression analysis, higher income and more nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) involved in the Framework Convention Alliance (a network dedicated to the FCTC) were associated with being among the earliest adopters (for income, adjusted odds ratio [AOR]=2.41; 95% confidence interval [Cl] = 1.55; for NGOs, AOR = 1.66; 95% Cl = 1.26, 2.17) or among early adopters (for income, AOR = 1.42; 95% Cl = 1.09, 1.84; for NGOs, AOR = 1.23; 95% Cl = 1.03, 1.45). Network exposure and event history analysis showed that in addition to income, the likelihood of adoption increased with increasing affiliation exposure to FCTC adopters through GLOBALink (an online network facilitating communication between tobacco control advocates). Conclusions. Public health programs should include a plan for creating opportunities for network interaction; otherwise, adoption and diffusion will be delayed and the investments in public health policy greatly diminished.

Suggested Citation

  • Wipfli, H.L. & Fujimoto, K. & Valente, T.W., 2010. "Global tobacco control diffusion: The case of the framework convention on tobacco control," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 100(7), pages 1260-1266.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2009.167833_6
    DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.167833
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2105/AJPH.2009.167833
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2105/AJPH.2009.167833?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. José Ignacio Nazif-Munoz & Amélie Quesnel-Vallée & Axel Berg, 2021. "Global diffusion of three road safety policies, 1964–2015," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Naowarut Charoenca & Jeremiah Mock & Nipapun Kungskulniti & Sunida Preechawong & Nicholas Kojetin & Stephen L. Hamann, 2012. "Success Counteracting Tobacco Company Interference in Thailand: An Example of FCTC Implementation for Low- and Middle-income Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-24, March.
    3. Hiilamo, Heikki & Glantz, Stanton A., 2015. "Implementation of effective cigarette health warning labels among low and middle income countries: State capacity, path-dependency and tobacco industry activity," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 241-245.
    4. Valente, Thomas W. & Pitts, Stephanie & Wipfli, Heather & Vega Yon, George G., 2019. "Network influences on policy implementation: Evidence from a global health treaty," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 188-197.
    5. Valente, Thomas W. & Dyal, Stephanie R. & Chu, Kar-Hai & Wipfli, Heather & Fujimoto, Kayo, 2015. "Diffusion of innovations theory applied to global tobacco control treaty ratification," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 89-97.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2009.167833_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.