IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i17p6648-d1225248.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perception Matters: Perceived vs. Objective Air Quality Measures and Asthma Diagnosis among Urban Adults

Author

Listed:
  • Jane E. Clougherty

    (Department of Environmental & Occupational Health, Drexel University Dornsife School of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA)

  • Pilar Ocampo

    (Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA)

Abstract

Urban air pollution is consistently linked to poorer respiratory health, particularly in communities of lower socioeconomic position (SEP), disproportionately located near highways and industrial areas and often with elevated exposures to chronic psychosocial stressors. Fewer studies, however, have considered air pollution itself as a psychosocial stressor and whether pollution may be impacting health through both direct physiologic and psychosocial pathways. We examined data on perceived air pollution exposures from a spatially representative survey of New York City adults through summer and winter 2012 ( n = 1183) using residence-specific ambient nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ) and fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ) exposure estimates. We used logistic regression to compare associations for perceived and objective air quality on self-reported asthma and general health, adjusting for sociodemographics and mental health. In models including all exposure metrics, we found small but significant associations for perceived air quality (OR = 1.12, 95% CI: 1.04–1.22) but not for NO 2 or PM 2.5 . Neither perceived nor objective pollution was significantly associated with self-reported general health. Results suggest that perceived air quality may be significantly associated with adult asthma, more so than objective air pollution and after adjusting for mental health—associations not observed for self-reported general health.

Suggested Citation

  • Jane E. Clougherty & Pilar Ocampo, 2023. "Perception Matters: Perceived vs. Objective Air Quality Measures and Asthma Diagnosis among Urban Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(17), pages 1-15, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:17:p:6648-:d:1225248
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/17/6648/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/17/6648/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Susan J. Elliott & Donald C. Cole & Paul Krueger & Nancy Voorberg & Sarah Wakefield, 1999. "The Power of Perception: Health Risk Attributed to Air Pollution in anUrban Industrial Neighbourhood," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(4), pages 621-634, August.
    2. Dominic Odwa Atari & Isaac N. Luginaah & Karen Fung, 2009. "The Relationship between Odour Annoyance Scores and Modelled Ambient Air Pollution in Sarnia, “Chemical Valley”, Ontario," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 6(10), pages 1-21, October.
    3. Yulin Guo & Fengfeng Liu & Yuanan Lu & Zongfu Mao & Hanson Lu & Yanyan Wu & Yuanyuan Chu & Lichen Yu & Yisi Liu & Meng Ren & Na Li & Xi Chen & Hao Xiang, 2016. "Factors Affecting Parent’s Perception on Air Quality—From the Individual to the Community Level," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-14, May.
    4. Séverine Deguen & Claire Ségala & Gaëlle Pédrono & Mounir Mesbah, 2012. "A New Air Quality Perception Scale for Global Assessment of Air Pollution Health Effects," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(12), pages 2043-2054, December.
    5. Elliott, Susan J. & Taylor, S.Martin & Walter, Stephen & Stieb, David & Frank, John & Eyles, John, 1993. "Modelling psychosocial effects of exposure to solid waste facilities," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 791-804, September.
    6. Taylor, S.Martin & Elliott, Susan & Eyles, John & Frank, John & Haight, Murray & Streiner, David & Walter, Stephen & White, Norman & Willms, Dennis, 1991. "Psychosocial impacts in populations exposed to solid waste facilities," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 441-447, January.
    7. Jayajit Chakraborty & Timothy W. Collins & Sara E. Grineski & Alejandra Maldonado, 2017. "Racial Differences in Perceptions of Air Pollution Health Risk: Does Environmental Exposure Matter?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-16, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daxin Dong & Xiaowei Xu & Wen Xu & Junye Xie, 2019. "The Relationship Between the Actual Level of Air Pollution and Residents’ Concern about Air Pollution: Evidence from Shanghai, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-18, November.
    2. Séverine Deguen & Manon Padilla & Cindy Padilla & Wahida Kihal-Talantikite, 2017. "Do Individual and Neighborhood Characteristics Influence Perceived Air Quality?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-19, December.
    3. Thaddaeus Egondi & Catherine Kyobutungi & Nawi Ng & Kanyiva Muindi & Samuel Oti & Steven Van de Vijver & Remare Ettarh & Joacim Rocklöv, 2013. "Community Perceptions of Air Pollution and Related Health Risks in Nairobi Slums," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-18, October.
    4. Vandermoere, Frédéric, 2008. "Psychosocial health of residents exposed to soil pollution in a Flemish neighbourhood," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(7), pages 1646-1657, April.
    5. Yeonkyeong Park & Insang Song & Jeeeun Yi & Seon-Ju Yi & Sun-Young Kim, 2020. "Web-Based Visualization of Scientific Research Findings: National-Scale Distribution of Air Pollution in South Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-14, March.
    6. Li, Zhengtao & Hu, Bin, 2018. "Perceived health risk, environmental knowledge, and contingent valuation for improving air quality: New evidence from the Jinchuan mining area in China," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 54-68.
    7. Walker, Chad & Baxter, Jamie & Ouellette, Danielle, 2015. "Adding insult to injury: The development of psychosocial stress in Ontario wind turbine communities," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 358-365.
    8. Gorica Stanojević & Slavica Malinović-Milićević & Nina B. Ćurčić & Milan Radovanović & Aleksandar Radivojević & Teodora Popović & Srećko Ćurčić, 2023. "An Assessment of the Multidimensional Drivers and Determinants of Public Risk Perception of and Behaviors Related to Exposure to Air Pollution in Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-19, December.
    9. Kevin Fox Gotham & Richard Campanella & Katie Lauve‐Moon & Bradford Powers, 2018. "Hazard Experience, Geophysical Vulnerability, and Flood Risk Perceptions in a Postdisaster City, the Case of New Orleans," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(2), pages 345-356, February.
    10. Ana Fernández-Somoano & Sabrina Llop & Inmaculada Aguilera & Ibon Tamayo-Uria & María Dolores Martínez & Maria Foraster & Ferran Ballester & Adonina Tardón, 2015. "Annoyance Caused by Noise and Air Pollution during Pregnancy: Associated Factors and Correlation with Outdoor NO 2 and Benzene Estimations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-15, June.
    11. Chuanshen Qin & Jianhua Xu & Gabrielle Wong‐Parodi & Lan Xue, 2020. "Change in Public Concern and Responsive Behaviors Toward Air Pollution Under the Dome," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(10), pages 1983-2001, October.
    12. Abbas El‐Zein & Rola Nasrallah & Iman Nuwayhid & Lea Kai & Jihad Makhoul, 2006. "Why Do Neighbors Have Different Environmental Priorities? Analysis of Environmental Risk Perception in a Beirut Neighborhood," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(2), pages 423-435, April.
    13. Chia-Lee Yang & Chi-Yo Huang & Yi-Hao Hsiao, 2021. "Using Social Media Mining and PLS-SEM to Examine the Causal Relationship between Public Environmental Concerns and Adaptation Strategies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-23, May.
    14. Dalia M. Muñoz-Pizza & Mariana Villada-Canela & M. A. Reyna & José Luis Texcalac-Sangrador & Jesús Serrano-Lomelin & Álvaro Osornio-Vargas, 2020. "Assessing the Influence of Socioeconomic Status and Air Pollution Levels on the Public Perception of Local Air Quality in a Mexico-US Border City," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-22, June.
    15. Jamaludin, Husna & Patunru, Arianto & Lahiri-Dutt, Kuntala, 2020. "Role of rumours and locals’ perceptions on the level of environmental impacts of Lynas Advanced Material Plant, Kuantan, Malaysia," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    16. Nguyen, Thanh Cong & Le, Hoa Thu & Nguyen, Hang Dieu & Le, Thanh Ha & Nguyen, Hong Quang, 2021. "Estimating economic benefits associated with air quality improvements in Hanoi City: An application of a choice experiment," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 420-433.
    17. Yaling Lu & Yuan Wang & Yujie Liao & Jiantong Wang & Mei Shan & Hongqiang Jiang, 2023. "Public Concern about Haze and Ozone in the Era of Their Coordinated Control in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-13, January.
    18. Jayajit Chakraborty & Timothy W. Collins & Sara E. Grineski & Alejandra Maldonado, 2017. "Racial Differences in Perceptions of Air Pollution Health Risk: Does Environmental Exposure Matter?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-16, January.
    19. Reeko Watanabe & Tsunemi Watanabe, 2020. "Does Haze Drive Pro-Environmental and Energy Conservation Behaviors? Evidence from the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Area in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1, November.
    20. Dominic Odwa Atari & Isaac N. Luginaah & Karen Fung, 2009. "The Relationship between Odour Annoyance Scores and Modelled Ambient Air Pollution in Sarnia, “Chemical Valley”, Ontario," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 6(10), pages 1-21, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:17:p:6648-:d:1225248. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.