IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2022i1p607-d1019425.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Building a New Framework for Urban Parking Facilities Research with Quality Improvement: The Case of Chongqing, China

Author

Listed:
  • Shifang Liu

    (Faculty of Architecture & Urban Planning, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China)

  • Shaohua Tan

    (Faculty of Architecture & Urban Planning, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China
    Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Construction and New Technology in Mountainous Town, Chongqing 400030, China)

Abstract

People-oriented development has become the main theme of China’s current social development, and the construction of various urban infrastructure has shifted from a focus on functionalism to a continuous pursuit of service quality. As an essential infrastructure for urban transport, urban parking facilities have an impact on pedestrian experience and landscape appearance based on the provision of parking functions. Therefore, this study is oriented to improving the quality of parking facilities, proposes a research framework of parking facilities based on meeting functional demand and service quality, and constructs a quality index to evaluate the quality of parking facilities, which includes three dimensions of evaluation indexes: pedestrian space impact, environmental space impact, and demand matching. By analyzing the current characteristics of urban parking facilities and measuring their quality index (6.5), the study finds that while satisfying the basic function of parking demand, it brings a negative impact on the pedestrian experience and the overall urban landscape appearance of the city. Motivated by this, this study proposes strategies to improve the quality of parking facilities: demand matching, spatial synergy, and environmental design to address parking difficulties, while injecting different ideas for future value orientation of parking facility planning and construction.

Suggested Citation

  • Shifang Liu & Shaohua Tan, 2022. "Building a New Framework for Urban Parking Facilities Research with Quality Improvement: The Case of Chongqing, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-24, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2022:i:1:p:607-:d:1019425
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/1/607/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/1/607/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mukhija, Vinit & Shoup, Donald, 2006. "Quantity versus Quality in Off-Street Parking Requirements," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt727788bk, University of California Transportation Center.
    2. Biruk G. Mesfin & Daniel(Jian) Sun & Bo Peng, 2022. "Impact of COVID-19 on Urban Mobility and Parking Demand Distribution: A Global Review with Case Study in Melbourne, Australia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-15, June.
    3. Changzheng Yuan & Yangbo Sun & Jun Lv & Anne C. Lusk, 2017. "Cycle Tracks and Parking Environments in China: Learning from College Students at Peking University," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-14, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gabbe, C.J. & Pierce, Gregory & Clowers, Gordon, 2020. "Parking policy: The effects of residential minimum parking requirements in Seattle," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    2. W. Bowman Cutter & Sofia F. Franco, 2012. "The uneasy case for lower Parking Standards," Nova SBE Working Paper Series wp564, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Nova School of Business and Economics.
    3. Cutter, W. Bowman & Franco, Sofia F., 2012. "Do parking requirements significantly increase the area dedicated to parking? A test of the effect of parking requirements values in Los Angeles County," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(6), pages 901-925.
    4. Jan K. Brueckner & Sofia F. Franco, 2017. "Parking and Urban Form," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 17(1), pages 95-127.
    5. Thumm, Alex Jürgen & Perl, Anthony, 2020. "Puzzling over parking: Assessing the transitional parking requirement in Vancouver, British Columbia," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 85-101.
    6. Guo, Zhan, 2013. "Home parking convenience, household car usage, and implications to residential parking policies," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 97-106.
    7. Rosenblum, Jeffrey & Hudson, Anne W. & Ben-Joseph, Eran, 2020. "Parking futures: An international review of trends and speculation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    8. McAslan, Devon & Sprei, Frances, 2023. "Minimum parking requirements and car ownership: An analysis of Swedish municipalities," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 45-58.
    9. Wang, Siqin & Liu, Yan, 2022. "Parking in inner versus outer city spaces: Spatiotemporal patterns of parking problems and their associations with built environment features in Brisbane, Australia," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    10. Yangkun Xia & Zhuo Fu & Sang-Bing Tsai & Jiangtao Wang, 2018. "A New TS Algorithm for Solving Low-Carbon Logistics Vehicle Routing Problem with Split Deliveries by Backpack—From a Green Operation Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-12, May.
    11. David Kohlrautz & Tobias Kuhnimhof, 2024. "Bicycle Parking Requirements in City Building Codes and Their Potential to Promote Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-13, March.
    12. Wang, James J. & Liu, Qian, 2014. "Understanding the parking supply mechanism in China: a case study of Shenzhen," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 77-88.
    13. Yen, Barbara T.H. & Mulley, Corinne & Burke, Matthew & Tseng, Wen-Chun, 2020. "Parking and restaurant business: Differences in business perceptions and customer travel behaviour in Brisbane, Queensland, Australia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    14. Norbert Mundorf & Colleen A. Redding & Songtao Bao, 2018. "Sustainable Transportation and Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-4, March.
    15. Yuyan Gao & David C. Schwebel & Lingling Zhang & Wangxin Xiao & Guoqing Hu, 2020. "Unsafe Bicycling Behavior in Changsha, China: A Video-Based Observational Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-10, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2022:i:1:p:607-:d:1019425. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.