IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i9p4947-d796844.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring Risk Factors of Recall-Associated Foodborne Disease Outbreaks in the United States, 2009–2019

Author

Listed:
  • Emily Sanchez

    (Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA 02111, USA
    Army Medical Department Student Detachment, U.S. Army Medical Center of Excellence, Fort Sam Houston, San Antonio, TX 78234, USA)

  • Ryan B. Simpson

    (Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA 02111, USA)

  • Yutong Zhang

    (Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA 02111, USA)

  • Lauren E. Sallade

    (Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA 02111, USA)

  • Elena N. Naumova

    (Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA 02111, USA)

Abstract

Earlier identification and removal of contaminated food products is crucial in reducing economic burdens of foodborne outbreaks. Recalls are a safety measure that is deployed to prevent foodborne illnesses. However, few studies have examined temporal trends in recalls or compared risk factors between non-recall and recall outbreaks in the United States, due to disparate and often incomplete surveillance records in publicly reported data. We demonstrated the usability of the electronic Foodborne Outbreak Reporting System (eFORS) and National Outbreak Reporting System (NORS) for describing temporal trends and outbreak risk factors of food recalls in 1998–2019. We examined monthly trends between surveillance systems by using segmented time-series analyses. We compared the risk factors (e.g., multistate outbreak, contamination supply chain stage, pathogen etiology, and food products) of recalls and non-recalls by using logistic regression models. Out of 22,972 outbreaks, 305 (1.3%) resulted in recalls and 9378 (41%) had missing recall information. However, outbreaks with missing recall information decreased at an accelerating rate of ~25%/month in 2004–2009 and at a decelerating rate of ~13%/month after the transition from eFORS to NORS in 2009–2019. Irrespective of the contaminant etiology, multistate outbreaks according to the residence of ill persons had odds 11.00–13.50 times (7.00, 21.60) that of single-state outbreaks resulting in a recall ( p < 0.001) when controlling for all risk factors. Electronic reporting has improved the availability of food recall data, yet retrospective investigations of historical records are needed. The investigation of recalls enhances public health professionals’ understanding of their annual financial burden and improves outbreak prediction analytics to reduce the likelihood and severity of recalls.

Suggested Citation

  • Emily Sanchez & Ryan B. Simpson & Yutong Zhang & Lauren E. Sallade & Elena N. Naumova, 2022. "Exploring Risk Factors of Recall-Associated Foodborne Disease Outbreaks in the United States, 2009–2019," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-20, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:9:p:4947-:d:796844
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/9/4947/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/9/4947/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Siobhan M Mor & Alfred DeMaria Jr. & Elena N Naumova, 2014. "Hospitalization Records as a Tool for Evaluating Performance of Food- and Water-Borne Disease Surveillance Systems: A Massachusetts Case Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(4), pages 1-8, April.
    2. Chuanhui Liao & Yu Luo & Weiwei Zhu, 2020. "Food Safety Trust, Risk Perception, and Consumers’ Response to Company Trust Repair Actions in Food Recall Crises," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-16, February.
    3. Hoffmann, Sandra A., 2011. "U.S. Food Safety Policy Enters a New Era," Amber Waves:The Economics of Food, Farming, Natural Resources, and Rural America, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, pages 1-6.
    4. Hoffmann, Sandra & Ahn, Jae-Wan, 2021. "Economic Cost of Major Foodborne Illnesses Increased $2 Billion From 2013 to 2018," Amber Waves:The Economics of Food, Farming, Natural Resources, and Rural America, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 2021(04), April.
    5. Hoffman, Sandra & Maculloch, Bryan & Batz, Michael, 2015. "Economic Burden of Major Foodborne Illnesses Acquired in the United States," Economic Information Bulletin 205081, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Evans, Keith S. & Teisl, Mario F. & Lando, Amy. M. & Liu, Sherry T., 2020. "Risk perceptions and food-handling practices in the home," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    2. Makofske, Matthew Philip, 2021. "Spoiled food and spoiled surprises: Inspection anticipation and regulatory compliance," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 348-365.
    3. Hoffmann, Sandra & Ahn, Jae-Wan, 2021. "Updating Economic Burden of Foodborne Diseases Estimates for Inflation and Income Growth," USDA Miscellaneous 316343, United States Department of Agriculture.
    4. Ray Huffaker & Monika Hartmann, 2021. "Reconstructing dynamics of foodborne disease outbreaks in the US cattle market from monitoring data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(1), pages 1-15, January.
    5. Yutong Zhang & Ryan B. Simpson & Lauren E. Sallade & Emily Sanchez & Kyle M. Monahan & Elena N. Naumova, 2022. "Evaluating Completeness of Foodborne Outbreak Reporting in the United States, 1998–2019," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-19, March.
    6. Tselepidakis, Elina, 2015. "Food Safety and the Demand for Leafy Greens," 2015 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 26-28, San Francisco, California 205583, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    7. Ollinger, Michael & Houser, Matthew, 2020. "Ground beef recalls and subsequent food safety performance," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    8. Hoffmann, Sandra & Ashton, Lydia & Todd, Jessica E. & Ahn, Jae-Wan & Berck, Peter, 2021. "Attributing U.S. Campylobacteriosis Cases to Food Sources, Season, and Temperature," USDA Miscellaneous 309617, United States Department of Agriculture.
    9. Bovay, John, 2021. "Moral hazard under discrete information disclosure: Evidence from food-safety inspections," 2021 Allied Social Sciences Association (ASSA) Annual Meeting (Virtual), January 3-5, 2021, San Diego, California 307948, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    10. Page, Elina Tselepidakis, 2018. "Trends in Food Recalls: 2004-13," Economic Information Bulletin 276244, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    11. Edwards, Matthew & Velandia, Margarita & Clark, Christopher D. & Lambert, Dayton M. & Pepper, Wendell H. & Jensen, Kimberly, 2016. "Product Liability Insurance Use Among Tennessee Fruit and Vegetable Farmers," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 47(2), pages 1-11, July.
    12. Lumka S. Dastile & Joseph Francis & Voster Muchenje, 2017. "Consumers’ Social Representations of Meat Safety in Two Selected Restaurants of Raymond Mhlaba Municipality in the Eastern Cape, South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-9, September.
    13. Rämme, Ulf & Daunfeldt, Sven-Olov & Rudholm, Niklas, 2012. "Market reform and food prices: Did the 1912 Slaughterhouse Reform affect meat prices in Stockholm?," HUI Working Papers 79, HUI Research.
    14. Hoffman, Sandra & Ahn, Jae-Wan, 2021. "Updating Economic Burden of Foodborne Diseases Estimates for Inflation and Income Growth," Economic Research Report 327181, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    15. Yangjunna Zhang & Annette M. O'Connor & Chong Wang & James S. Dickson & H. Scott Hurd & Bing Wang, 2019. "Interventions Targeting Deep Tissue Lymph Nodes May Not Effectively Reduce the Risk of Salmonellosis from Ground Pork Consumption: A Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(10), pages 2237-2258, October.
    16. Hoffmann, Sandra & Ashton, Lydia & Todd, Jessica E. & Ahn, Jae-wan & Berck, Peter, 2021. "Attributing U.S. Campylobacteriosis Cases to Food Sources, Season, and Temperature," USDA Miscellaneous 309620, United States Department of Agriculture.
    17. Nina Zhang & Emily Liu & Alexander Tang & Martin Cheng Ye & Kevin Wang & Qian Jia & Zuyi Huang, 2019. "Data-Driven Analysis of Antimicrobial Resistance in Foodborne Pathogens from Six States within the US," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-14, May.
    18. Hoffman, Sandra & Ashton, Lydia & Todd, Jessica E & Ahn, Jae-Wan & Berck, Peter, 2021. "Attributing U.S. Campylobacteriosis Cases to Food Sources, Season, and Temperature," Economic Research Report 327200, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    19. Sandra Hoffmann & Lydia Ashton & Jae‐Wan Ahn, 2021. "Food safety: A policy history and introduction to avenues for economic research," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(2), pages 680-700, June.
    20. Aishwarya Venkat & Tania M. Alarcon Falconi & Melissa Cruz & Meghan A. Hartwick & Shalini Anandan & Naveen Kumar & Honorine Ward & Balaji Veeraraghavan & Elena N. Naumova, 2019. "Spatiotemporal Patterns of Cholera Hospitalization in Vellore, India," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-14, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:9:p:4947-:d:796844. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.