IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i4p2152-d749033.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pyrolysis Behaviors and Residue Properties of Iron-Rich Rolling Sludge from Steel Smelting

Author

Listed:
  • Hengdi Ye

    (National Engineering Research Center of Sintering and Pelletizing Equipment System, Zhongye Changtian International Engineering Co., Ltd., Changsha 410205, China)

  • Qian Li

    (National Engineering Research Center of Sintering and Pelletizing Equipment System, Zhongye Changtian International Engineering Co., Ltd., Changsha 410205, China
    School of Engineering, GongQing Institute of Science and Technology, Jiujiang 332020, China)

  • Hongdi Yu

    (Tianjin Key Lab of Biomass/Wastes Utilization, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

  • Li Xiang

    (Tianjin Key Lab of Biomass/Wastes Utilization, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

  • Jinchao Wei

    (National Engineering Research Center of Sintering and Pelletizing Equipment System, Zhongye Changtian International Engineering Co., Ltd., Changsha 410205, China)

  • Fawei Lin

    (Tianjin Key Lab of Biomass/Wastes Utilization, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

Abstract

Iron-rich rolling sludge (FeRS) represents a kind of typical solid waste produced in the iron and steel industry, containing a certain amount of oil and large amounts of iron-dominant minerals. Pyrolysis under anaerobic environment can effectively eliminate organics at high temperatures without oxidation of Fe. This paper firstly investigated comprehensively the pyrolysis characteristics of FeRS. The degradation of organics in FeRS mainly occurred before 400 °C. The activation energy for pyrolysis of FeRS was extremely low, ca. 5.44 kJ/mol. The effects of pyrolytic temperature, atmosphere, heating rate, and stirring on pyrolysis characteristics were conducted. Commonly, the yield of solid residues maintained around 85 wt.%, with approximately 13 wt.% oil and 2 wt.% gas. Due to the low yield of oil and gas, their further utilization remains difficult despite CO 2 introduction which could upgrade their quality. The solid residues after pyrolysis exhibited porous properties with co-existence of micropores and mesopores. Combined with the high content of zero-valent iron, magnetic property, hydrophobic characteristic, and low density, the solid residues could be further utilized for water pollution control and soil remediation. Moreover, the solid residues were suitable for sintering to recover valuable iron resources. However, the solid residues also contained certain heavy metals, such as Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb, and Zn, which might cause secondary pollution during their utilization. In particular, the toxic Cr possessed high content, which should be treated with detoxification and removal. This paper provides fundamental information for pyrolysis of FeRS and utilization of solid residues.

Suggested Citation

  • Hengdi Ye & Qian Li & Hongdi Yu & Li Xiang & Jinchao Wei & Fawei Lin, 2022. "Pyrolysis Behaviors and Residue Properties of Iron-Rich Rolling Sludge from Steel Smelting," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-17, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:4:p:2152-:d:749033
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/4/2152/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/4/2152/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tyagi, Vinay Kumar & Lo, Shang-Lien, 2013. "Microwave irradiation: A sustainable way for sludge treatment and resource recovery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 18(C), pages 288-305.
    2. Rodrigues da Silva, Rafael & Mathias, Flavio Roberto de Carvalho & Bajay, Sergio Valdir, 2018. "Potential energy efficiency improvements for the Brazilian iron and steel industry: Fuel and electricity conservation supply curves for integrated steel mills," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 816-824.
    3. Le Kang & Hui Ling Du & Hao Zhang & Wan Li Ma, 2018. "Systematic Research on the Application of Steel Slag Resources under the Background of Big Data," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-12, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ecaterina Matei & Andra Mihaela Predescu & Anca Andreea Șăulean & Maria Râpă & Mirela Gabriela Sohaciu & George Coman & Andrei-Constantin Berbecaru & Cristian Predescu & Dumitru Vâju & Grigore Vlad, 2022. "Ferrous Industrial Wastes—Valuable Resources for Water and Wastewater Decontamination," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-25, October.
    2. Rongxin Wu & Boqiang Lin, 2022. "Does Energy Efficiency Realize Energy Conservation in the Iron and Steel Industry? A Perspective of Energy Rebound Effect," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-20, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhen, Guangyin & Lu, Xueqin & Kato, Hiroyuki & Zhao, Youcai & Li, Yu-You, 2017. "Overview of pretreatment strategies for enhancing sewage sludge disintegration and subsequent anaerobic digestion: Current advances, full-scale application and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 559-577.
    2. Rodriguez, Cristina & Alaswad, A. & Benyounis, K.Y. & Olabi, A.G., 2017. "Pretreatment techniques used in biogas production from grass," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P2), pages 1193-1204.
    3. Liu, Yang & Zhang, Congrui & Xu, Xiaochuan & Ge, Yongxiang & Ren, Gaofeng, 2022. "Assessment of energy conservation potential and cost in open-pit metal mines: Bottom-up approach integrated energy conservation supply curve and ultimate pit limit," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    4. Huang, Yu-Fong & Shih, Chun-Hao & Chiueh, Pei-Te & Lo, Shang-Lien, 2015. "Microwave co-pyrolysis of sewage sludge and rice straw," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 638-644.
    5. Skoczkowski, Tadeusz & Verdolini, Elena & Bielecki, Sławomir & Kochański, Max & Korczak, Katarzyna & Węglarz, Arkadiusz, 2020. "Technology innovation system analysis of decarbonisation options in the EU steel industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    6. Luiz Moreira Coelho Junior & Edvaldo Pereira Santos Júnior, 2022. "Space-Time Conglomerates Analysis of the Forest-Based Power Plants in Brazil (2000–2019)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-12, June.
    7. Akgul, Deniz & Cella, Monica Angela & Eskicioglu, Cigdem, 2017. "Influences of low-energy input microwave and ultrasonic pretreatments on single-stage and temperature-phased anaerobic digestion (TPAD) of municipal wastewater sludge," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 271-282.
    8. Li, Yue & Chen, Yinguang & Wu, Jiang, 2019. "Enhancement of methane production in anaerobic digestion process: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C), pages 120-137.
    9. Chen, Demin & Li, Jiaqi & Wang, Zhao & Lu, Biao & Chen, Guang, 2022. "Hierarchical model to find the path reducing CO2 emissions of integrated iron and steel production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    10. Kor-Bicakci, Gokce & Ubay-Cokgor, Emine & Eskicioglu, Cigdem, 2019. "Effect of dewatered sludge microwave pretreatment temperature and duration on net energy generation and biosolids quality from anaerobic digestion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 782-795.
    11. Onumaegbu, C. & Mooney, J. & Alaswad, A. & Olabi, A.G., 2018. "Pre-treatment methods for production of biofuel from microalgae biomass," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 16-26.
    12. Kostas, Emily T. & Beneroso, Daniel & Robinson, John P., 2017. "The application of microwave heating in bioenergy: A review on the microwave pre-treatment and upgrading technologies for biomass," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 12-27.
    13. Hong-Mei Liu & Hong-Hao Sun & Rong Guo & Dong Wang & Hao Yu & Diana Do Rosario Alves & Wei-Min Hong, 2022. "Prediction of China’s Industrial Solid Waste Generation Based on the PCA-NARBP Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-15, April.
    14. Sun, Jingchao & Na, Hongming & Yan, Tianyi & Qiu, Ziyang & Yuan, Yuxing & He, Jianfei & Li, Yingnan & Wang, Yisong & Du, Tao, 2021. "A comprehensive assessment on material, exergy and emission networks for the integrated iron and steel industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    15. Lin, Kuo-Hsiung & Lai, Nina & Zeng, Jun-Yan & Chiang, Hung-Lung, 2020. "Microwave-pyrolysis treatment of biosludge from a chemical industrial wastewater treatment plant for exploring product characteristics and potential energy recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    16. Zunlong Jin & Guoping Li & Junlei Wang & Zhien Zhang, 2019. "Design, Modeling, and Experiments of the Vortex-Induced Vibration Piezoelectric Energy Harvester with Bionic Attachments," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-13, April.
    17. Kubule, Anna & Ločmelis, Kristaps & Blumberga, Dagnija, 2020. "Analysis of the results of national energy audit program in Latvia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    18. Berghout, Niels & Meerman, Hans & van den Broek, Machteld & Faaij, André, 2019. "Assessing deployment pathways for greenhouse gas emissions reductions in an industrial plant – A case study for a complex oil refinery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 354-378.
    19. Kor-Bicakci, Gokce & Eskicioglu, Cigdem, 2019. "Recent developments on thermal municipal sludge pretreatment technologies for enhanced anaerobic digestion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 423-443.
    20. Falciglia, Pietro P. & Roccaro, Paolo & Bonanno, Lorenzo & De Guidi, Guido & Vagliasindi, Federico G.A. & Romano, Stefano, 2018. "A review on the microwave heating as a sustainable technique for environmental remediation/detoxification applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 147-170.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:4:p:2152-:d:749033. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.