IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i20p13097-d939729.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Design and Validation of a Food Frequency Questionnaire to Evaluate the Consumption of Trans Fatty Acids in the Adult Population (FFQ-TFA)

Author

Listed:
  • Edgar Ricardo Soto-Equihua

    (Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro, Av. de las Ciencias S/N, Juriquilla, Querétaro 76320, Mexico)

  • Claudia Ivonne Ramírez-Silva

    (Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Av. Universidad 655, Santa María Ahuacatitlán, Cuernavaca 62100, Mexico)

  • Juana Elizabeth Elton-Puente

    (Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro, Av. de las Ciencias S/N, Juriquilla, Querétaro 76320, Mexico)

  • Jorge Luis Chávez-Servín

    (Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro, Av. de las Ciencias S/N, Juriquilla, Querétaro 76320, Mexico)

  • Pablo Gutiérrez-Lara

    (Facultad de Contaduría y Administración, Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro, Hidalgo S/N, Querétaro 76010, Mexico)

  • Elsa Fernanda Chávez-Alabat

    (Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro, Av. de las Ciencias S/N, Juriquilla, Querétaro 76320, Mexico)

  • María del Carmen Caamaño

    (Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro, Av. de las Ciencias S/N, Juriquilla, Querétaro 76320, Mexico)

  • Karina de la Torre-Carbot

    (Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro, Av. de las Ciencias S/N, Juriquilla, Querétaro 76320, Mexico)

Abstract

Instruments for estimating the intake of food components can be useful in the prevention and/or treatment of diseases related to improper diet. There is, at present, no scientifically validated instrument for estimating consumption of trans fatty acids (TFA) in the Mexican population. The objective of this study was to design and validate such an instrument: a questionnaire that can be used to estimate consumption of TFA from food products. The questionnaire was applied to 162 students from the Autonomous University of Querétaro (UAQ). There were two phases to the study: (1) design of a food frequency questionnaire to assess consumption of trans fatty acids (FFQ-TFA) and an eating practices questionnaire (EPQ-TFA); (2) validation of the instrument. Content validity was measured by expert review and by Aiken’s V method, obtaining an overall score of 0.895. As final tests for the FFQ-TFA analysis, criterion validity was measured using Spearman’s correlation (r = 0.717, p < 0.01) and a linear regression (B = 0.668), considering the results of the 24-h dietary recall (24 HR); and reproducibility or temporal stability was measured using Pearson’s correlation (r = 0.406, p < 0.01). Subsequently, a Pearson correlation was applied between TFA consumption estimated by the FFQ-TFA-2 and the global score from the EPQ-TFA-2 (r = 0.351, p < 0.01). A Pearson correlation was applied between the EPQ-TFA-1 and the EPQ-TFA-2 (r = 0.575, p < 0.01). TFA consumption per day was 2.49 ± 1.32 g in the participating population, which was 1.04 ± 0.51% of their total kcal consumption.

Suggested Citation

  • Edgar Ricardo Soto-Equihua & Claudia Ivonne Ramírez-Silva & Juana Elizabeth Elton-Puente & Jorge Luis Chávez-Servín & Pablo Gutiérrez-Lara & Elsa Fernanda Chávez-Alabat & María del Carmen Caamaño & Ka, 2022. "Design and Validation of a Food Frequency Questionnaire to Evaluate the Consumption of Trans Fatty Acids in the Adult Population (FFQ-TFA)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-16, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:20:p:13097-:d:939729
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/20/13097/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/20/13097/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shanteau, James & Weiss, David J. & Thomas, Rickey P. & Pounds, Julia C., 2002. "Performance-based assessment of expertise: How to decide if someone is an expert or not," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(2), pages 253-263, January.
    2. Hendry, V.L. & Almíron-Roig, E. & Monsivais, P. & Jebb, S.A. & Neelon, S.E.B. & Griffin, S.J. & Ogilvie, D.B., 2015. "Impact of regulatory interventions to reduce intake of artificial trans-fatty acids: A systematic review," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 105(3), pages 32-42.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Renaud, Jean & Levrat, Eric & Fonteix, Christian, 2008. "Weights determination of OWA operators by parametric identification," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 77(5), pages 499-511.
    2. Mitja Kovac & Rok Spruk, 2019. "Does the ban on trans-fats improve public health? In search of the optimal policy response," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 258-281, June.
    3. Celia Burgaz & Vanessa Gorasso & Wouter M. J. Achten & Carolina Batis & Luciana Castronuovo & Adama Diouf & Gershim Asiki & Boyd A. Swinburn & Mishel Unar-Munguía & Brecht Devleesschauwer & Gary Sacks, 2023. "The effectiveness of food system policies to improve nutrition, nutrition-related inequalities and environmental sustainability: a scoping review," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 15(5), pages 1313-1344, October.
    4. Spassova, Gerri & Palmeira, Mauricio & Andrade, Eduardo B., 2018. "A ratings pattern heuristic in judgments of expertise: When being right Looks wrong," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 26-47.
    5. Chakhar, Salem & Ishizaka, Alessio & Labib, Ashraf & Saad, Inès, 2016. "Dominance-based rough set approach for group decisions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(1), pages 206-224.
    6. Njoku, Jonathan C. & van der Heijden, Beatrice I.J.M. & Inanga, Eno L., 2010. "Fusion of expertise among accounting faculty: towards an expertise model for academia in accounting," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 51-62.
    7. Mauksch, Stefanie & von der Gracht, Heiko A. & Gordon, Theodore J., 2020. "Who is an expert for foresight? A review of identification methods," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    8. Padraig MacNeela & Anne Scott & Pearl Treacy & Abbey Hyde, 2010. "In the know: cognitive and social factors in mental health nursing assessment," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(9‐10), pages 1298-1306, May.
    9. Brunelli, Matteo & Fedrizzi, Michele, 2024. "Inconsistency indices for pairwise comparisons and the Pareto dominance principle," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(1), pages 273-282.
    10. Hristos Karahalios, 2017. "Evaluating the knowledge of experts in the maritime regulatory field," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(4), pages 426-441, May.
    11. Tomer Geva & Maytal Saar‐Tsechansky, 2021. "Who Is a Better Decision Maker? Data‐Driven Expert Ranking Under Unobserved Quality," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(1), pages 127-144, January.
    12. Andersson, Patric, 2004. "How well do financial experts perform? A review of empirical research on performance of analysts, day-traders, forecasters, fund managers, investors, and stockbrokers," SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Business Administration 2004:9, Stockholm School of Economics.
    13. Ellyza Karim & Jamil Ahmad & Kamisah Osman, 2017. "Fuzzy Delphi Method for Content Validation of Integrated Science Process Skills Instrument," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 7(6), pages 773-785, June.
    14. Steven M. Glover & Mark H. Taylor & Yi‐Jing Wu & Ken T. Trotman, 2019. "Mind the Gap: Why Do Experts Have Differences of Opinion Regarding the Sufficiency of Audit Evidence Supporting Complex Fair Value Measurements?†," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(3), pages 1417-1460, September.
    15. Rodgers, Waymond & Degbey, William Y. & Housel, Thomas J. & Arslan, Ahmad, 2020. "Microfoundations of collaborative networks: The impact of social capital formation and learning on investment risk assessment," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    16. von der Gracht, Heiko A. & Hommel, Ulrich & Prokesch, Tobias & Wohlenberg, Holger, 2016. "Testing weighting approaches for forecasting in a Group Wisdom Support System environment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 4081-4094.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:20:p:13097-:d:939729. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.