IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i19p12676-d932980.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Negative Effects of Physical Activity Calorie Equivalent Labels on Consumers’ Food Brand Evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoke Yang

    (School of Humanities, Fujian University of Technology, Fuzhou 350002, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Meiling Hong

    (College of Management and Economics, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Dejin Shi

    (College of Management and Economics, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)

  • Qian Chen

    (College of Management and Economics, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)

Abstract

(1) Background: To prevent excessive caloric intake, a food labeling strategy is widely adopted by governments. Physical activity calorie equivalent (PACE) labels prove to be effective in reducing calorie intake. However, previous literature has mainly discussed the effect of PACE labels on consumers’ purchase intention for high-calorie foods but has not analyzed whether consumers evaluate food brands negatively after inhibiting the consumers’ purchase intention for high-calorie foods. Therefore, the aims of this study are to explore the negative effects of PACE labels on consumers’ food brand evaluation and the underlying psychological mechanism. (2) Methods: This study manipulated the two calorie-information labeling (standard calorie label and PACE labels) in two studies, involving potato chips and chocolate products. It also adopted a prevention focus and anticipated enjoyment of food consumption variables to detect the moderation effects between consumers’ promotion focus and PACE labels. (3) Results: Results show that compared with calorie labels, PACE labels have a more negative influence on consumers’ food brand evaluation. Furthermore, consumers stimulated by PACE labels develop a stronger prevention focus, thereby reducing their anticipated enjoyment of food brands, and ultimately leading to lower brand evaluations. In addition, when consumers have a promotion focus before choosing food, PACE labels cannot reduce their anticipated enjoyment and food brand evaluation for food brands. (4) Conclusions: While focusing on the negative effect of PACE labels on consumers’ purchase intention for high-calorie foods, it should also be noted that PACE labels have a negative effect on food brand evaluation. Therefore, food enterprises should try their best to activate consumers’ promotion focus through various environmental cues, so as to avoid a double negative effect on consumers’ food purchases and brand evaluations.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoke Yang & Meiling Hong & Dejin Shi & Qian Chen, 2022. "The Negative Effects of Physical Activity Calorie Equivalent Labels on Consumers’ Food Brand Evaluation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-19, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:19:p:12676-:d:932980
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/19/12676/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/19/12676/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yunhui Huang & Jaideep Sengupta & Fischer Eileen & Leonard Lee, 2020. "The Influence of Disease Cues on Preference for Typical versus Atypical Products," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 47(3), pages 393-411.
    2. J.J. Brakus & B.H. Schmitt & L. Zarantonello, 2009. "Brand Experience: What Is It? How Do We Measure It? And Does It Affect Loyalty?," Post-Print hal-00799102, HAL.
    3. Saad Shakil & Shahbaz Majeed, 2018. "“Brand Purchase Intention And Brand Purchase Behavior In Halal Meat Brand”," Journal of Marketing and Logistics (JML), Khadim Ali Shah Bukhari Institute of Technology (KASBIT), vol. 1, pages 163-182, August.
    4. Huizhen Jin & Yi‐a Li & Dongjin Li & Jun Zheng, 2020. "The effects of physical activity calorie equivalent labeling on dieters' food consumption and post‐consumption physical activity," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2), pages 723-741, June.
    5. Suresh Ramanathan & Patti Williams, 2007. "Immediate and Delayed Emotional Consequences of Indulgence: The Moderating Influence of Personality Type on Mixed Emotions," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 34(2), pages 212-223, May.
    6. George E. Newman & Margarita Gorlin & Ravi Dhar, 2014. "When Going Green Backfires: How Firm Intentions Shape the Evaluation of Socially Beneficial Product Enhancements," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 41(3), pages 823-839.
    7. Yuanhao Huang & Xiaoke Yang & Qian Chen, 2022. "The Negative Effects of Long Time Physical Activity Calorie Equivalent Labeling on Purchase Intention for Unhealthy Food," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-26, March.
    8. Min Zhao & Darren W. Dahl & Steve Hoeffler, 2014. "Optimal Visualization Aids and Temporal Framing for New Products," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 41(4), pages 1137-1151.
    9. Crowe, Ellen & Higgins, E. Tory, 1997. "Regulatory Focus and Strategic Inclinations: Promotion and Prevention in Decision-Making," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 117-132, February.
    10. repec:ksb:jourml:v:1:y:2018:p:152-171 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Trudel, Remi & Murray, Kyle B. & Cotte, June, 2012. "Beyond expectations: The effect of regulatory focus on consumer satisfaction," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 93-97.
    12. Echo Wen Wan & Jiewen Hong & Brian Sternthal, 2009. "The Effect of Regulatory Orientation and Decision Strategy on Brand Judgments," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 35(6), pages 1026-1038, April.
    13. Min Zhao & Darren W. Dahl & Steve Hoeffler, 2014. "Optimal Visualization Aids and Temporal Framing for New Products," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 41(4), pages 1137-1151.
    14. Rebecca C. A. Tobi & Francesca Harris & Ritu Rana & Kerry A. Brown & Matthew Quaife & Rosemary Green, 2019. "Sustainable Diet Dimensions. Comparing Consumer Preference for Nutrition, Environmental and Social Responsibility Food Labelling: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-22, November.
    15. Kammerlander, Nadine & Burger, Dominik & Fust, Alexander & Fueglistaller, Urs, 2015. "Exploration and exploitation in established small and medium-sized enterprises: The effect of CEOs' regulatory focus," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 582-602.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuanhao Huang & Xiaoke Yang & Qian Chen, 2022. "The Negative Effects of Long Time Physical Activity Calorie Equivalent Labeling on Purchase Intention for Unhealthy Food," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-26, March.
    2. Xiaoke Yang & Yuanhao Huang & Xiaoying Cai & Yijing Song & Hui Jiang & Qian Chen & Qiuhua Chen, 2021. "Using Imagination to Overcome Fear: How Mental Simulation Nudges Consumers’ Purchase Intentions for Upcycled Food," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-21, January.
    3. Yuanyuan Zhou & Qian Li & Shiyang Gong & Daniel P. Hampson & Zhicen Liu, 2023. "Looking back is better than looking forward: visualization, temporal frames, and new product evaluation in China," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(3), pages 829-856, July.
    4. Kim, Joonkyung & Zhao, Min & Soman, Dilip, 2023. "Converging vs diverging: The effect of visual representation of goal structure on financial decisions," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 362-377.
    5. Bhargave, Rajesh & Chakravarti, Amitav & Guha, Abhijit, 2015. "Two-stage decisions increase preference for hedonic options," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 64119, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Luo, Yong (Eddie) & Wong, Veronica & Chou, Ting-Jui, 2016. "The role of product newness in activating consumer regulatory goals," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 600-611.
    7. Ghiassaleh, Arezou & Kocher, Bruno & Czellar, Sandor, 2020. "Best seller!? Unintended negative consequences of popularity signs on consumer choice behavior," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 805-820.
    8. Stern Neill & Raghuvar Dutt Pathak & Barbara A. Ribbens & Terry W. Noel & Gurmeet Singh, 2020. "The influence of managerial optimism and self-regulation on learning and business growth expectations within an emerging economic context," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 187-204, March.
    9. Schweitzer, Fiona & Mai, Robert, 2021. "The double-edged sword of intricate idea enactment in product development," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 392-402.
    10. Ruby Saine & Alexander J. Kull & Ali Besharat & Sajeev Varki, 2021. "I See Me: The Role of Observer Imagery in Reducing Consumer Transgressions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 168(4), pages 721-732, February.
    11. Gino, Francesca & Margolis, Joshua D., 2011. "Bringing ethics into focus: How regulatory focus and risk preferences influence (Un)ethical behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 115(2), pages 145-156, July.
    12. Daniel L Gamache & François Neville & Jonathan Bundy & Cole E Short, 2020. "Serving differently: CEO regulatory focus and firm stakeholder strategy," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(7), pages 1305-1335, July.
    13. Maier, Erik & Dost, Florian, 2018. "The positive effect of contextual image backgrounds on fluency and liking," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 109-116.
    14. Chung, Tuck Siong & Low, Angie, 2022. "CEO regulatory focus and myopic marketing management," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 247-267.
    15. Sun, Jin & Keh, Hean Tat & Lee, Angela Y., 2019. "Shaping consumer preference using alignable attributes: The roles of regulatory orientation and construal level," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 151-168.
    16. Zhao, Min & Xia, Lan, 2021. "Joint or separate? The effect of visual presentation on imagery and product evaluation," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 935-952.
    17. Chien-Huang Lin & Ming Chen, 2019. "The icon matters: how design instability affects download intention of mobile apps under prevention and promotion motivations," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 211-229, March.
    18. Liu, Fu & Wei, Haiying & Wang, Xingyuan & Zhu, Zhenzhong & Chen, Haipeng Allan, 2023. "The influence of online review dispersion on consumers’ purchase intention: The moderating role of dialectical thinking," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    19. Adomako, Samuel & Opoku, Robert A. & Frimpong, Kwabena, 2017. "The Moderating Influence of Competitive Intensity on the Relationship between CEOs' Regulatory Foci and SME Internationalization," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 268-278.
    20. Gada, Viswa Prasad & Goyal, Lakshmi & Popli, Manish, 2021. "Earnouts in M&A deal structuring: The impact of CEO prevention focus," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(1).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:19:p:12676-:d:932980. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.