IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i16p10150-d889630.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Top 50 Most Cited Articles on Special Olympics: A Bibliometric Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Selina Khoo

    (Centre for Sport and Exercice Sciences, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
    Disability Sport Research Centre, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia)

  • Payam Ansari

    (DCU Business School, Dublin City University, D09Y5NO Dublin, Ireland)

  • Jacob John

    (Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia)

  • Mark Brooke

    (Centre for English Language Communication, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117511, Singapore)

Abstract

The Special Olympics was established in 1968 to “provide year-round sports training and athletic competition in a variety of Olympic-type sports for children and adults with intellectual disabilities”. It has gained recognition in the field of sports and healthcare of persons with intellectual disability, with a large number of dedicated researchers and institutions all over the world. However, there is an urgent need to analyze the progress and current status of this research field to identify knowledge gaps and develop this discipline. The aim of this study was to analyze the scientific production of the Special Olympics and report the bibliometric characteristics of the top 50 most cited Special Olympics publications. A systematic search was conducted on the Scopus database and bibliometric data were extracted and analyzed. The top 50 publications received 1632 citations. A total of 138 authors (63 female and 75 male) contributed to these publications. The two main areas of study were the physical health of Special Olympics athletes ( n = 27) and the psycho-social health of athletes ( n = 12).

Suggested Citation

  • Selina Khoo & Payam Ansari & Jacob John & Mark Brooke, 2022. "The Top 50 Most Cited Articles on Special Olympics: A Bibliometric Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-12, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:16:p:10150-:d:889630
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/16/10150/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/16/10150/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Shilbury, 2011. "A bibliometric analysis of four sport management journals," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(4), pages 434-452, October.
    2. Tomaz Bartol & Gordana Budimir & Doris Dekleva-Smrekar & Miro Pusnik & Primoz Juznic, 2014. "Assessment of research fields in Scopus and Web of Science in the view of national research evaluation in Slovenia," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 98(2), pages 1491-1504, February.
    3. Kelly Hsieh & Thessa I. M. Hilgenkamp & Sumithra Murthy & Tamar Heller & James H. Rimmer, 2017. "Low Levels of Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in Adults with Intellectual Disabilities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-17, December.
    4. Shilbury, David, 2011. "A bibliometric analysis of four sport management journals," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 14(4), pages 434-452.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kevin K. Byon & Jingxian (Cecilia) Zhang & Wooyoung (William) Jang, 2022. "Examining the Value Co-Creation Model in Motor Racing Events: Moderating Effect of Residents and Tourists," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-29, August.
    2. Kitchin, P.J. & David Howe, P., 2013. "How can the social theory of Pierre Bourdieu assist sport management research?," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 123-134.
    3. Filo, Kevin & Lock, Daniel & Karg, Adam, 2015. "Sport and social media research: A review," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 166-181.
    4. Massimiliano M. Pellegrini & Riccardo Rialti & Giacomo Marzi & Andrea Caputo, 2020. "Sport entrepreneurship: A synthesis of existing literature and future perspectives," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 795-826, September.
    5. Olga Pilipczuk, 2022. "Building the Cognitive Enterprise in the Energy Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-13, December.
    6. Satish Kumar & Filomena Maggino & Raj V. Mahto & Riya Sureka & Leonardo Salvatore Alaimo & Weng Marc Lim, 2022. "Social Indicators Research: A Retrospective Using Bibliometric Analysis," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 162(1), pages 413-448, July.
    7. Alyt Oppewal & Thessa I. M. Hilgenkamp & Liselotte Schäfer Elinder & Ellen Freiberger & Pauli Rintala & Myriam Guerra-Balic & Maria Giné-Garriga & Antonio Cuesta-Vargas & Guillermo R. Oviedo & Oriol S, 2018. "Correlates of Sedentary Behaviour in Adults with Intellectual Disabilities—A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-14, October.
    8. Satish Kumar & Riya Sureka & Weng Marc Lim & Sachin Kumar Mangla & Nisha Goyal, 2021. "What do we know about business strategy and environmental research? Insights from Business Strategy and the Environment," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(8), pages 3454-3469, December.
    9. Andrea Mervar & Maja Jokić, 2022. "Core-periphery nexus in the EU social sciences: bibliometric perspective," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(10), pages 5793-5817, October.
    10. Romero-Silva, Rodrigo & de Leeuw, Sander, 2021. "Learning from the past to shape the future: A comprehensive text mining analysis of OR/MS reviews," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    11. Ernesto D. R. Santibanez Gonzalez & Vinay Kandpal & Marcio Machado & Mauro Luiz Martens & Sushobhan Majumdar, 2023. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Circular Economies through Sustainable Smart Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-22, November.
    12. Sánchez-Gil, Susana & Gorraiz, Juan & Melero-Fuentes, David, 2018. "Reference density trends in the major disciplines," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 42-58.
    13. Sai Bhargavi Vedula & Rakesh Kumar Agrawal, 2024. "Mapping Spiritual Leadership: A Bibliometric Analysis and Synthesis of Past Milestones and Future Research Agenda," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 189(2), pages 301-328, January.
    14. H. Kent Baker & Satish Kumar & Debidutta Pattnaik, 2020. "Twenty‐five years of Review of Financial Economics: A bibliometric overview," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(1), pages 3-23, January.
    15. Funk, Daniel C., 2017. "Introducing a Sport Experience Design (SX) framework for sport consumer behaviour research," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 145-158.
    16. Tomaz Bartol & Gordana Budimir & Primoz Juznic & Karmen Stopar, 2016. "Mapping and classification of agriculture in Web of Science: other subject categories and research fields may benefit," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 109(2), pages 979-996, November.
    17. Gordana Budimir & Sophia Rahimeh & Sameh Tamimi & Primož Južnič, 2021. "Comparison of self-citation patterns in WoS and Scopus databases based on national scientific production in Slovenia (1996–2020)," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(3), pages 2249-2267, March.
    18. Antonio Cavacini, 2015. "What is the best database for computer science journal articles?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(3), pages 2059-2071, March.
    19. Pattnaik, Debidutta & Hassan, Mohammad Kabir & Kumar, Satish & Paul, Justin, 2020. "Trade credit research before and after the global financial crisis of 2008 – A bibliometric overview," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    20. Eungi Kim & Da-Yeong Jeong, 2023. "Dominant Characteristics of Subject Categories in a Multiple-Category Hierarchical Scheme: A Case Study of Scopus," Publications, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-13, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:16:p:10150-:d:889630. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.